Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit Update: Injuries, Warning Status, and Legal Options

Next Review: August 29, 2026

CPSC warned consumers to stop using BLONGKY FCC 390 Pro portable electric car kettles because they can unexpectedly spew hot steam or liquid.

The warning involves taupe and white portable electric car kettles sold online for vehicle use. CPSC said the hazard can occur when the lid mechanism fails and the top opens unexpectedly.

This review did not identify a verified public class action, multidistrict litigation proceeding, or settlement program specifically involving BLONGKY portable electric car kettles. Consumers who suffered burns or other losses may still request an individual legal review.

Consumers should stop using the kettles immediately and dispose of them according to local hazardous-waste disposal procedures. Burned consumers may want to preserve the kettle, packaging, order records, photos, medical records, and communications with sellers.

Quick Facts

• CPSC issued the BLONGKY portable electric car kettle warning on November 20, 2025.
• The affected model is FCC 390 Pro, sold in taupe and white versions.
• The kettles can spew hot steam or liquid, creating a serious burn hazard.
• CPSC reported at least 11 incidents, including nine burn reports and one second-degree burn report.

Latest News & Updates on the Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit

July 2026

July 29, 2026 – This page was reviewed for current warning and publicly reported litigation developments. No verified public class action, multidistrict litigation proceeding, or settlement program specifically involving BLONGKY portable electric car kettles was identified during this review. The November 2025 CPSC warning remains the principal verified public safety action discussed on this page.

November 2025

November 20, 2025 – CPSC warned consumers to immediately stop using BLONGKY portable electric car kettles because they can spew hot steam or liquid, creating a risk of serious burn injury. The agency said Maoming Huazhou Zibailong Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as BLONGKY, had been unresponsive to CPSC requests for a recall or product information [1].

November 20, 2025 – CPSC reported at least 11 incidents involving hot steam or liquid escaping from the kettles, including nine burn reports and one report of second-degree burns. CPSC also instructed consumers to stop using the kettles and dispose of them according to local hazardous-waste disposal procedures [1].

Burn Safety Background

July 2026 – Medical guidance recognizes that burns can range from minor skin injuries to serious wounds requiring urgent care, depending on severity, location, and symptoms. Consumers with serious burns, blistering, worsening pain, signs of infection, or burns involving sensitive areas should seek medical advice [2, 3].

What Is the Portable Electric Car Kettle?

The affected products are BLONGKY portable electric car kettles with model number FCC 390 Pro. They were sold in taupe, identified as K-Taupe, and white, identified as K-White.

The model number is printed on the front of the kettle above the digital temperature display. Consumers should compare the model number, product color, packaging, order records, and product photos against the CPSC warning before assuming a kettle is included.

The kettles were manufactured in China and sold online for about $17 to $40. CPSC identified Amazon.com, Walmart.com, eBay.com, and other websites as sales channels.

This event is a CPSC product safety warning rather than a cooperative recall. CPSC stated that BLONGKY was unresponsive to the agency’s requests for a recall or product information.

Which BLONGKY Car Kettles Are Affected?

The CPSC warning applies to the following portable electric car kettle products:

• BLONGKY portable electric car kettle, model FCC 390 Pro, taupe version K-Taupe.
• BLONGKY portable electric car kettle, model FCC 390 Pro, white version K-White.

Consumers should check the front of the kettle above the digital temperature display for the model number. If the model number is difficult to read, order confirmations, marketplace records, product photos, packaging, or seller communications may help confirm product identity.

Because the firm did not agree to a recall, consumers should not expect a standard recall remedy unless new information becomes available. CPSC’s instruction is to stop using and dispose of the kettles according to local hazardous-waste disposal procedures.

Reported Risks or Injuries

The reported hazard involves hot steam or liquid unexpectedly escaping from the kettle. CPSC also warned that consumers can be burned when the lid mechanism fails and the top opens unexpectedly.

CPSC reported at least 11 incidents involving hot steam or liquid escaping from the kettles. Those reports included nine burn reports and one report of second-degree burns.

The CPSC warning confirms burn reports but does not identify every body location or long-term outcome. Depending on the incident, hot liquid or steam burns may require first aid, medical evaluation, wound care, follow-up treatment, or documentation for later review.

The vehicle setting may make the hazard more difficult to avoid because a consumer may have limited space to move away from hot liquid or steam. That is a reasonable injury-mechanism concern, but the individual facts should be documented rather than assumed.

How Does the Problem Occur, and Who May Be Liable?

The problem can occur when a consumer opens the kettle and hot steam or water suddenly escapes. CPSC also identified lid-mechanism failure as a hazard because the top can open unexpectedly and expose consumers to burns.

A legal investigation may examine the lid mechanism, pressure control, steam release, heating element, temperature controls, instructions, warnings, testing records, complaint history, online listings, seller communications, and CPSC’s request history. These records may help determine whether the design, manufacturing, warnings, sale practices, or post-sale response were adequate.

Potentially responsible parties may include Maoming Huazhou Zibailong Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as BLONGKY, manufacturers, component suppliers, importers, distributors, online sellers, marketplaces, or other entities involved in designing, manufacturing, importing, selling, or warning about the kettles. Liability depends on product identity, incident facts, causation, injury evidence, damages, available defendants, and applicable state law.

A CPSC warning does not automatically prove that any company is legally responsible for a specific burn injury. An individual review may focus on whether the kettle was the affected model, whether steam or liquid escaped, whether the lid failed, and what evidence connects the product to the injury.

Who May Be Affected?

Consumers may be affected if they purchased or used a BLONGKY FCC 390 Pro portable electric car kettle in taupe or white. Vehicle drivers, passengers, household members, or bystanders may also be affected if they were exposed to sudden hot steam or liquid discharge.

People who experienced a burn should consider preserving photos, videos, the kettle, packaging, order records, seller communications, medical records, prescription records, and any messages with online marketplaces. Evidence may be important because legal claims depend on product identity, causation, injury severity, and damages.

Consumers who still have the affected kettle should stop using it immediately. CPSC instructs consumers to dispose of the product according to local hazardous-waste disposal procedures.

Do I Qualify?

• Did you purchase or use a BLONGKY portable electric car kettle?
• Does the kettle show model number FCC 390 Pro?
• Did hot steam or liquid unexpectedly escape from the kettle?
• Did the lid mechanism fail or open unexpectedly?
• Did you suffer burns, medical expenses, missed work, scarring, or other documented losses?
• Do you have the kettle, order record, packaging, photos, medical records, or communications with the seller?

A legal review can help determine eligibility by evaluating product identity, incident facts, burn severity, medical treatment, evidence, damages, potentially responsible parties, marketplace issues, and filing deadlines.

Do I Have a Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit?

If you suffered burns or other losses involving a BLONGKY FCC 390 Pro portable electric car kettle, you may have legal options. Contact Schmidt & Clark for a free case review.

Start My Free Case Review

Important Legal Actions or Warnings

Potential Compensation

Potential compensation may include emergency care, urgent care, burn treatment, wound care, prescription medication, follow-up appointments, scar treatment, and future medical expenses.

Additional damages may include pain and suffering, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, scarring, disfigurement, out-of-pocket expenses, travel costs, and related household expenses. The specific damages available depend on the injury, documentation, state law, causation evidence, and the facts of the claim.

Compensation amounts vary by case. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Legal Process Overview

Step 1: Free case review. The review begins with the kettle model, purchase date, seller, incident description, burn location, treatment history, and any losses. Photos, order records, packaging, medical records, prescription records, seller communications, and product images may help establish the basic facts.

Step 2: Investigation. The investigation may examine product identity, lid performance, steam or liquid discharge, CPSC warning materials, marketplace records, medical documentation, and communications with BLONGKY or online sellers. Attorneys may also review whether the incident matches the steam, liquid, or lid-mechanism hazard described by CPSC.

Step 3: Filing. A supported claim may allege defective design, manufacturing defects, inadequate warnings, negligence, breach of warranty, marketplace liability, or other product liability theories. Filing occurs only when the evidence and applicable law support a claim against one or more responsible parties.

Step 4: Discovery/negotiation. The parties may exchange product-design materials, testing records, complaint data, online sales records, warning materials, medical records, expert opinions, and testimony. Negotiations may focus on product identity, causation, burn severity, medical treatment, scarring, lost income, and available defendants.

Step 5: Resolution. A claim may resolve through settlement, dismissal, court ruling, or trial. The outcome depends on proof of product involvement, defect evidence, medical documentation, damages, defenses, available defendants, marketplace issues, and applicable law.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit

What is the Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit?

The phrase refers to potential individual legal claims involving burn injuries from BLONGKY FCC 390 Pro portable electric car kettles. This review did not identify a verified public class action, MDL, or settlement program specifically involving these kettles.

Which portable electric car kettle is affected?

The CPSC warning involves BLONGKY portable electric car kettles with model number FCC 390 Pro. The affected versions were sold in taupe and white.

Why did CPSC warn consumers about BLONGKY car kettles?

CPSC warned that the kettles can unexpectedly spew hot steam or liquid. The agency also warned that consumers can be burned when the lid mechanism fails and the top opens unexpectedly.

Were burn injuries reported in the Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit investigation?

CPSC reported at least 11 incidents involving hot steam or liquid escaping from the kettles. Those reports included nine burn reports and one report of second-degree burns.

Where were the BLONGKY kettles sold?

The kettles were sold online, including on Amazon.com, Walmart.com, eBay.com, and other websites. CPSC says they sold for about $17 to $40.

What should consumers do now?

Consumers should stop using the kettles immediately. CPSC instructs consumers to dispose of the product according to local hazardous-waste disposal procedures.

Can I file a Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit after a burn?

Possibly. A legal review may consider whether the kettle was the affected model, whether hot steam or liquid escaped, whether the lid failed, and whether a documented burn injury occurred. Eligibility depends on the facts and applicable state law.

What evidence could support a Portable Electric Car Kettle Lawsuit?

Helpful evidence may include the kettle, model-number photos, online order records, packaging, incident photos, burn photos, medical records, prescription records, seller communications, and marketplace communications. Consumers should also document when and how the steam, liquid, or lid event occurred.

References

1. https://www.cpsc.gov/Warnings/2026/CPSC-Warns-Consumers-to-Immediately-Stop-Using-Portable-Electric-Car-Kettles-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Burn-Injury-Distributed-by-BLONGKY
2. https://www.mayoclinic.org/first-aid/first-aid-burns/basics/art-20056649
3. https://medlineplus.gov/burns.html