PFAS Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

Our law firm is reviewing potential lawsuits for people affected by PFAS, widely-used “forever chemicals” that accumulate in the environment and human bodies, linked to serious side effects like liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased fertility, kidney and testicular cancer, and death.
Award Logos
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.


Update: 16 Plaintiffs Allege Cancer and Ulcerative Colitis from PFAS Water Contamination

A group of 16 individuals filed a product liability lawsuit on May 14, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, targeting over 20 chemical companies—including 3M, DuPont, Chemours, and Raytheon—over PFAS contamination from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) that allegedly tainted local drinking water and led to serious health issues [1].

The plaintiffs claim prolonged exposure to PFAS “forever chemicals” in their water supply caused or contributed to diagnoses of testicular cancer (by several plaintiffs), kidney cancer, and ulcerative colitis. After the complaint was transferred into the federal AFFF multidistrict litigation (MDL) on June 16, it became part of more than 10,300 similar claims, consolidating complex, overlapping cases.

The MDL, overseen by Judge Richard Gergel, is moving toward bellwether trials—starting with kidney and testicular cancer cases in October 2025—to assess causation and potential damages in early trials. Plaintiffs allege these companies knew of the “bioaccumulative” nature of PFAS and failed to warn or mitigate risks, prompting claims ranging from defective product and negligence to emotional distress and public nuisance.

PFAS Lawsuit Overview

PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are synthetic chemicals developed by 3M and DuPont in the 1930s that accumulate in the environment and human bodies.

These "forever chemicals" are linked to serious health issues including cancer and immune system disorders. Multiple lawsuits have been filed against manufacturers like 3M, DuPont, and Chemours for knowingly producing and selling products containing these toxic chemicals without warning users of the health risks [2].

Latest PFAS Lawsuit Updates

  • June 16, 2025 - A new Penn State-led citizen science initiative tested 167 private wells across Pennsylvania and found PFAS “forever chemicals” in 65% of samples, with 18% exceeding EPA drinking water limits [3].
  • May 14, 2025 - The U.S. EPA has announced updates to its approach on regulating PFAS. The agency will keep the existing standards for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), but is delaying the deadline for compliance from 2029 to 2031 [4].
  • December 16, 2024 – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton initiated a lawsuit against 3M and DuPont, accusing them of falsely advertising PFAS-containing products as safe, despite knowing the associated health risks for decades [5].
  • November 13, 2024 – A federal study by the U.S. Geological Survey estimated that up to 27% of Americans (approximately 95 million people) might be consuming drinking water contaminated with PFAS [6]. 
  • October 2024 – Carrier Global agreed to a $730 million settlement to resolve lawsuits over PFAS in its firefighting foam products [7].
  • May 24, 2024 – BASF agreed to a $316.5 million settlement with U.S. public water systems to address PFAS contamination from its firefighting foam products. The funds are designated for remediation efforts to ensure safe drinking water for affected communities [8].
  • June 5, 2023 – A significant settlement was reached, awarding $1.18 billion to victims affected by PFAS-contaminated drinking water. This settlement includes compensation for medical expenses and environmental clean-up efforts [9].

PFAS Statistics

  • According to CDC data, blood PFOS levels declined by more than 85% from 1999-2000 to 2017-2018
  • Blood PFOA levels declined by more than 70% during the same period
  • A recent study identified at least 1,582 sites in 49 states as PFAS polluted
  • For the average person in the U.S., the PFAS exposure level is 2,100 to 6,300 ng/L per liter of blood

FDA Reports and Statistics

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined there is evidence that PFAS can cause cancer. Studies have found links between PFAS exposure and:

  • Kidney and Testicular Cancer: Epidemiological studies indicate that individuals with higher levels of PFOA in their blood have a 2-3 times greater risk of developing kidney cancer, while testicular cancer rates are notably higher among those exposed to PFOS.
  • Pancreatic cancer (studies suggest a 50% increased risk with high PFAS levels)
  • Prostate cancer (studies show a 40% increased risk with high levels of PFOA and PFOS)

PFAS Injuries & Side Effects

PFAS exposure has been linked to numerous serious health conditions that can develop after contamination accumulates in the body.

  • Cancer: Kidney, testicular, pancreatic, bladder, breast, prostate cancer, leukemia, lymphoma
  • Liver Damage: Changes in liver enzymes indicating potential liver dysfunction
  • Thyroid Disease: 30% increased risk associated with PFAS exposure
  • Reproductive Issues: Decreased fertility (women exposed to PFAS may experience a 15% reduction in fertility rates)
  • Cardiovascular Problems: High cholesterol levels (10-20 mg/dL increase in those with high exposure)
  • Immune System Disorders: Decreased vaccine response and compromised immunity
  • Developmental Issues: Low birth weights and childhood obesity (1.5 times higher risk)

Pennsylvania Private Wells Show Widespread PFAS Contamination

A recent Penn State-led citizen science initiative tested 167 private wells across Pennsylvania and found **PFAS “forever chemicals” in 65% of samples**, with **18% exceeding EPA drinking water limits** [10].

The highest levels were discovered in the southeastern region and areas near urban development. Surprisingly, contamination was more common in affluent neighborhoods, while proximity to agricultural biosolid sites showed no clear link.

Researchers emphasize that simple home filtration can address the issue but urge well owners to regularly test their water.

U.S. Beers Found Contaminated with ‘Forever Chemicals’

A recent scientific investigation has revealed that several locally brewed beers contain levels of toxic PFAS that exceed new EPA guidelines.

The research, conducted by scientists at the American Chemical Society’s journal Environmental Science & Technology, discovered a notable presence of PFAS in numerous beer samples, particularly those brewed in areas with known contaminated municipal water supplies.

Lead researcher Jennifer Hoponick Redmon explained the inspiration behind the study: “As someone who occasionally enjoys beer, I was curious whether PFAS in drinking water might be making its way into the beverages we drink. We hope our research drives improvements in water treatment and industry safeguards.”

The research team adapted an EPA-approved method for detecting PFAS in drinking water and applied it to 23 different beers. Some of these brews originated from cities with known PFAS contamination in their water systems, while others were popular beers with unidentified water sources.

Key Findings from the Study

  • Beer produced in North Carolina, California, and Michigan showed the highest PFAS levels.
  • There was a clear correlation between PFAS levels in public water supplies and those found in locally brewed beers.
  • In 95% of samples tested, PFAS compounds were detected, including perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), both of which now have strict EPA limits in drinking water.

Are Imported Beers Safer?
Interestingly, international beers included in the analysis — one from the Netherlands and two from Mexico — had much lower or undetectable levels of PFAS, suggesting that water source quality plays a critical role in contamination risk.

Though many breweries use standard water treatment systems, these processes typically do not filter out PFAS. This leaves both brewers and consumers vulnerable, particularly in regions already struggling with water quality issues.

The research team hopes their findings will encourage both policy change and innovation in filtration technology.

As Redmon noted, “Reducing PFAS in drinking water is key to keeping them out of beverages like beer. Our findings highlight the need for targeted treatment strategies to protect public health.”

With PFAS now recognized as a significant health concern, this study serves as a sobering reminder that even something as familiar as beer can be impacted by the broader challenges of environmental contamination.

EPA Pushes Back PFAS Compliance Deadlines, Plans to Revise Key Water Safety Rules

On May 14, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced updates to its approach on regulating drinking water contaminants known as PFAS. The agency will keep the existing standards for two substances—perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)—but is delaying the deadline for compliance from 2029 to 2031.

At the same time, the EPA revealed that it intends to roll back regulations for four other PFAS chemicals originally covered under a broader drinking water safety rule established during the Biden administration. The agency says it plans to propose these changes in the fall of 2025 and finalize them in early 2026.

These revisions follow the Biden-era rule from April 10, 2024, which set Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and health-based goals for six types of PFAS. That rule aimed to give public water systems five years to adapt their infrastructure and meet the new safety thresholds.

Now, the EPA plans to move ahead with extending the compliance deadline to 2031 and eliminate regulations for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX (also known as HFPO-DA), and a chemical mixture assessed by a Hazard Index that includes those three plus PFBS.

Despite scaling back some parts of the original rule, the EPA signaled that it will stand by its standards for PFOA and PFOS and defend them in court amid legal challenges. The agency emphasized a renewed focus on “holding polluters accountable,” pointing to a future model that places financial responsibility on those responsible for contamination.

Environmental advocates were quick to criticize the delay and deregulation, warning that these changes could undermine public health protections and conflict with provisions in the Safe Drinking Water Act designed to prevent weakening of existing standards.

Meanwhile, several industry voices welcomed the changes. The Association of State Drinking Water Administrators noted that many states and water systems were struggling to meet the original 2029 deadline, citing challenges with conducting pilot testing, developing infrastructure plans, and building new treatment systems in time.

Do You Qualify for a PFAS Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a PFAS lawsuit if:

  • You were exposed to PFAS through contaminated drinking water, consumer products, or occupational exposure
  • You experienced serious side effects including any of the health conditions listed above
  • The injuries required medical treatment or hospitalization
  • You can provide medical documentation linking your injuries to PFAS exposure

Evidence Required for a PFAS Lawsuit

  • Medical records documenting your diagnosis and treatment
  • Evidence of PFAS exposure (residence in affected area, employment in high-risk occupation)
  • Water testing results if available
  • Documentation of when your exposure occurred

Related Article: How Much Will Filing a Class Action Lawsuit Cost?

Damages You Can Recover

  • Medical expenses (past and ongoing)
  • Lost wages and loss of future earnings
  • Pain and suffering
  • Permanent disability
  • Loss of consortium
  • Punitive damages against manufacturers

PFAS Recall Information

While there have not been traditional "recalls" of PFAS, there have been significant regulatory actions:

  • The EPA has established health advisories for PFAS in drinking water
  • Several states have implemented their own, stricter regulations
  • The FAA no longer requires airports to use PFAS-containing firefighting foam (changed in 2018)
  • The Department of Defense has limited the use of PFAS foam to emergency responses only

Related Article: DuPont AFFF Lawsuit

See all related toxic tort lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Statute of Limitations for PFAS Lawsuits

Time limitations for filing PFAS lawsuits vary by state and circumstances, typically ranging from 1-6 years from the date of injury discovery. Due to the latent nature of PFAS-related illnesses, many courts apply the "discovery rule," meaning the statute begins when you discovered or reasonably should have discovered your injury and its connection to PFAS.

Contact a PFAS attorney promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the applicable timeframe.

Related Article: Burn Pit Exposure Lawsuit (Cancer Risks)

FAQs

1. How much compensation can I get from a PFAS lawsuit?

Compensation varies based on exposure severity, health impacts, and other factors. Average settlements typically range from $175,000 to $350,000 per claimant, with more severe cases potentially receiving between $200,000 and $500,000.

2. Who can file a PFAS lawsuit?

Individuals exposed to PFAS who developed health issues and public water suppliers with contaminated water systems can file lawsuits. This includes residents exposed through drinking water and workers in high-risk occupations.

3. Where is PFAS commonly found?

PFAS is found in nonstick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics, food packaging, firefighting foam, contaminated water systems, and certain manufacturing facilities. Military bases like Camp Lejeune have confirmed high levels of PFAS contamination.

4. How can I check if my water supply is contaminated with PFAS?

You can review local water quality reports, contact your water utility provider, or have your water tested by a certified laboratory for PFAS chemicals.

5. Can PFAS be removed from the body?

Currently, there are no medical procedures that can remove PFAS from the body. The best approach is to eliminate the source of exposure and avoid PFAS-containing products.

6. What does it cost to hire a PFAS attorney?

Most PFAS attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront costs. Attorney fees are typically paid from any settlement recovered, and you pay nothing if your case is unsuccessful.

7. Which occupations have the highest risk of PFAS exposure?

Firefighters (especially at airports and military bases), workers in chemical plants that manufacture PFAS, and employees at facilities that use PFAS in their products face the highest exposure risks.

8. Are PFAS lawsuits individual claims or class actions?

Both types exist. Individual lawsuits are common for personal injury claims, while class actions have been filed for widespread contamination affecting communities. There is also multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidating similar cases.

9. Have there been any significant PFAS settlements?

Yes, notable settlements include $921 million in West Virginia, $850 million in Minnesota, and $730 million from Carrier Global for firefighting foam products.

10. How long does a PFAS lawsuit typically take?

PFAS lawsuits can take anywhere from 1-3 years or longer, depending on case complexity, evidence available, and whether the case settles or goes to trial.

Related Articles:

Get A Free PFAS Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

Time is limited to pursue legal action for PFAS exposure. Many states have strict statutes of limitations, giving you only a few years from the date of injury discovery to file your claim.

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we offer:

  • Free, confidential consultations to evaluate your case
  • No upfront costs or fees
  • Payment only if we win your case

Don't wait until it's too late to seek justice and compensation for the harm caused by PFAS exposure.

References: 

  1. https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/afff/pfas-drinking-water-lawsuit-16-plaintiffs-testicular-cancer-kidney-cancer-ulcerative-colitis/
  2. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained 
  3. https://www.psu.edu/news/research/story/forever-chemicals-detected-65-sampled-private-wells-pennsylvania
  4. https://www.bsigroup.com/en-US/insights-and-media/insights/blogs/the-epa-holds-steady-on-pfas-standards/
  5. https://www.esgdive.com/news/3m-dupont-sued-by-texas-ag-ken-paxton-over-pfas-products-teflon-scotchgard-stainmaster/735659/
  6. https://www.waterworld.com/drinking-water-treatment/pfas/press-release/55242211/usgs-estimates-20-of-us-population-relies-on-pfas-contaminated-drinking-water
  7. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/carrier-reaches-730-mln-settlement-over-fire-protection-unit-pfas-claims-2024-10-21/
  8. https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/basf-announces-316-million-settlement-over-pfas-claims/
  9. https://cen.acs.org/policy/litigation/Companies-agree-PFAS-settlement-US-public-water-systems/101/web/2023/06
  10. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/carrier-reaches-730-mln-settlement-over-fire-protection-unit-pfas-claims-2024-10-21/
  11. https://phys.org/news/2025-06-chemicals-sampled-private-wells-pennsylvania.html
  12. https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/afff/pfas-drinking-water-lawsuit-16-plaintiffs-testicular-cancer-kidney-cancer-ulcerative-colitis/