Negligent Homicide Definition
3 Types of Defence, Examples & Penalties

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.

---

Negligent homicide is a grave legal offense that can lead to imprisonment. Although it is not as severe as murder or manslaughter, it can still have significant repercussions that affect your freedom. 

Having worked extensively on negligent homicide cases as a criminal defense attorney, I thoroughly comprehend the legal intricacies of such claims.

In this article, I will provide essential information on negligent homicide and offer guidance on navigating the legal process.

Quick Summary

• Negligent homicide occurs when a person’s reckless or negligent actions result in another person’s death, going beyond simple carelessness to a failure to act as a reasonable person would in the same situation.
• To convict, prosecutors must prove the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty through negligence, and that their actions directly caused the victim’s death.
• Common defenses include arguing that the defendant’s actions were not criminally negligent, that another event or person was responsible, or that there is insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
• If charged, individuals should avoid speaking to law enforcement without an attorney, gather any evidence or witness accounts that support their case, and work with an experienced criminal defense lawyer to develop a strong legal strategy.

What Is Negligent Homicide?

Negligent homicide is a form of criminal homicide with or without intent based on negligence. Generally, it occurs when someone causes another's death through careless disregard for their safety and well-being [1].

Committing negligent homicide involves the following actions:

• Commits an act in a reckless way that leads to a high risk of death or great bodily injury to another human being
• Commits some act of criminal negligence

If an individual behaves in a way that a reasonable person would know creates such a risk, it could be considered criminal negligence. This means the behavior differs greatly from what a reasonable would do in the same situation.

A person acts with criminal negligence when his or her behavior ignores a clear danger or the safety of others. However, the exact definition of this term can vary depending on the criminal laws of each state.

For example, according to Arizona law, "criminal negligence" occurs when someone does not realize the substantial and unjustifiable risk that their actions could lead to someone's death. A reasonable person would know that acting that way would create such a risk.

Related Articles: Negligent Homicide Sentence

Examples Of Negligent Homicide

Some common criminal negligence examples include:

• Driving a motor vehicle in a crowded neighborhood while texting at top speeds.
• Shooting a lethal firearm into the air amidst a packed celebration.
• Leaving a child in a car without supervision during hot weather.

Based on previous cases I have worked in, I discovered that many states consider negligent homicide and involuntary manslaughter the same type of criminal offense [2]. 

"There are some critical pieces in the language of the law to highlight and explain more. First, involuntary manslaughter charges in negligent homicide cases only apply when another law is broken. Simple accidents do not qualify."
- Robert Helfend, Criminal Defense Attorney at Robert M. Helfend, Attorney at Law

What Is The Difference Between Negligent Homicide And Manslaughter?

The difference between negligent homicide and manslaughter is in the level of intent involved in the killing. 

Negligent homicide, also known as involuntary manslaughter, occurs when a person leads to another person's death through their own negligence or recklessness without intending to kill. 

On the other hand, voluntary manslaughter involves killing another person with some level of intent but without the premeditation or malice required for a murder charge.

Common Defenses In Negligent Homicide Cases

When facing criminal charges, building a strong defense is essential to challenge the prosecution’s case and establish reasonable doubt.

The following are three key defense strategies, including their requirements, supporting evidence, and common challenges defendants may face in court.

1. Self-Defense: Justifying the Use of Force

Self-defense is one of the most commonly used legal defenses, particularly in cases involving assault or homicide charges. To successfully claim self-defense, the defendant must demonstrate that their actions were necessary to protect themselves from imminent harm.

Key Elements to Prove:

• Imminent Threat – The danger must have been immediate and unavoidable, rather than a hypothetical or distant threat.
• Reasonable Fear of Harm – The defendant must have genuinely believed they were in danger, and that belief must have been reasonable given the circumstances.
• Proportional Use of Force – The level of force used must match the severity of the threat (e.g., using deadly force only in response to a life-threatening attack).

Supporting Evidence:

• Witness statements corroborating the threat.
• Physical evidence, such as injuries sustained by the defendant.
• Surveillance footage or forensic analysis supporting the claim of self-defense.
• Expert testimony on self-defense laws and appropriate responses to threats.

Examples of Successful and Unsuccessful Claims:

• Successful Example: A person is confronted by an attacker wielding a knife and uses a similar level of force to defend themselves.
• Unsuccessful Example: A defendant uses a firearm against someone attempting to punch them, where lethal force was unnecessary.

Common Prosecution Counterarguments:

• Arguing that the force used was excessive given the situation.
• Claiming there was no imminent threat, making the use of force unjustified.

Why This Matters: Courts take self-defense claims seriously, but they also scrutinize whether the defendant reasonably believed they were in danger and whether their response was proportionate to the threat they faced.

2. Accidental Killing: Proving Lack of Intent

This defense applies when the death was unintentional and occurred without negligence. Accidents happen, but when they result in a fatality, the legal system examines whether the defendant’s actions were lawful and responsible at the time of the incident.

Key Elements to Prove:

• Lack of Intent – Demonstrating that there was no deliberate action intended to cause harm.
• No Negligence – Showing that the defendant’s actions were reasonable and in accordance with safety standards at the time of the accident.

Supporting Evidence:

• Witness statements detailing the circumstances of the event.
• Forensic evidence confirming the lack of premeditation or reckless behavior.
• Expert testimony from accident reconstruction specialists or firearms experts (if applicable).

Examples of Successful and Unsuccessful Claims:

• Successful Example: A hunting accident where the shooter followed all safety protocols, but an unforeseen event caused a fatal outcome.
• Unsuccessful Example: A person handling a firearm while intoxicated, leading to an accidental discharge and death.

Common Prosecution Counterarguments:

• Proving negligence, such as disregarding safety measures.
• Arguing that, while not intentional, the defendant’s recklessness directly caused the fatality.

Why This Matters: Courts differentiate between unavoidable accidents and avoidable negligence. Demonstrating a lack of reckless behavior is key to a successful accidental killing defense.

3. Insufficient Evidence: Challenging the Prosecution’s Case

In criminal trials, the prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A defense based on insufficient evidence argues that the state has failed to meet this burden, making a conviction unjustified.

Key Legal Standard:

Instead of proving a specific defense, this strategy focuses on exposing weaknesses in the prosecution’s case by challenging the reliability of their evidence.

Common Ways to Challenge Evidence:

• Demonstrating inconsistencies in witness testimonies.
• Questioning the accuracy and handling of forensic evidence.
• Highlighting contaminated or improperly collected DNA samples.
• Emphasizing gaps in the chain of custody for key evidence.

Examples of Successful and Unsuccessful Claims:

• Successful Example: The prosecution’s key witness provides conflicting statements, making their credibility doubtful.
• Unsuccessful Example: There is overwhelming physical evidence directly linking the defendant to the crime, such as video footage.

Common Prosecution Counterarguments:

• Presenting circumstantial evidence that, when combined, strongly suggests guilt.
• Using expert testimony to validate forensic findings against defense challenges.

Why This Matters: The insufficient evidence defense is most effective when there are inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case, making it difficult for the jury to convict with certainty.

Additional Defense Strategies and Legal Representation

Every case is unique, and a skilled defense attorney plays a crucial role in crafting a strategy that best fits the specific circumstances.

Attorneys analyze case details, identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s arguments, and leverage legal precedents to strengthen their client’s defense.

Defendants facing serious charges, such as negligent homicide or self-defense cases, should seek legal guidance early to ensure their rights are protected and all available defense options are explored.

Penalties For Negligent Homicide

Negligent homicide is a serious criminal offense, and penalties vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction.

Sentencing can be influenced by base penalties, aggravating and mitigating factors, and state-specific laws.

Understanding these variations is crucial for anyone facing such charges.

Comparison of Base Penalties and Sentencing Variations

Aggravating Factors and Their Impact on Sentencing

Certain circumstances can increase the severity of a negligent homicide charge, potentially leading to longer sentences or felony upgrades.

• Use of a Deadly Weapon – In states like Arizona, the presence of a weapon can elevate the charge from a non-dangerous to a dangerous felony, significantly increasing the potential prison sentence.
• Repeat Offenses – Defendants with prior convictions often face harsher penalties, as courts are less likely to grant leniency.
• Gross Negligence – In California, vehicular manslaughter can escalate from a misdemeanor to a felony when the negligence is classified as gross.

Mitigating Factors That May Reduce Sentencing

In some cases, mitigating factors may result in a more lenient sentence, including the possibility of probation instead of incarceration.

• First-Time Offender Status – Defendants with no criminal history may receive reduced sentences or alternatives like supervised probation.
• Lack of Prior Convictions – A clean record can be used to argue for leniency, especially when there is no pattern of reckless behavior.
• Cooperation with Authorities – Defendants who assist law enforcement or show genuine remorse may receive a more favorable outcome.

State-by-State Variations in Negligent Homicide Laws

Each state defines and prosecutes negligent homicide differently, often categorizing it separately from manslaughter or murder:

• Arizona – The severity of the charge depends on whether the offense is classified as non-dangerous or dangerous, largely determined by the use of a weapon.
• Texas – Criminally negligent homicide is less severe than murder or manslaughter, typically resulting in lower sentencing guidelines.
• California – Vehicular manslaughter penalties vary based on the degree of negligence, with cases involving gross negligence carrying much harsher sentences.

Federal vs. State Penalties for Negligent Homicide

Negligent homicide is primarily prosecuted under state laws, but federal courts may have jurisdiction in specific cases, such as:

• Crimes committed on federal property or involving federal employees.
• Incidents that cross state lines, where federal laws may apply.

While federal law does not define negligent homicide the same way states do, it may prosecute similar cases under related criminal statutes.

Collateral Consequences Beyond Legal Penalties

A conviction for negligent homicide carries long-term consequences beyond the courtroom, affecting many aspects of life:

• Professional Licenses – Many industries require background checks, and a conviction may lead to license revocation or disqualification from certain careers.
• Employment Opportunities – Criminal records can make it difficult to secure jobs, especially in professions that involve safety or public trust.
• Social and Community Impact – Being convicted of causing someone’s death carries a strong social stigma, which can impact personal relationships and community standing.

Why Legal Representation is Crucial

Given the complex legal implications and potential life-altering consequences, seeking guidance from an experienced defense attorney is critical when facing negligent homicide charges.

Legal professionals can:

• Examine case specifics to determine possible defenses.
• Challenge aggravating factors or push for consideration of mitigating circumstances.
• Advocate for reduced sentencing or alternative penalties such as probation.

If you are facing a criminal charge of criminal negligence, you must ask for help from an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Procedural Timeline for Negligent Homicide Cases

Understanding the legal process for a negligent homicide case is crucial for both defendants and legal professionals.

Below is a step-by-step guide outlining the major phases, key actions, and considerations involved in these cases.

Step-by-Step Guide to Legal Proceedings

Phase	Description	Key Actions and Considerations
1. Initial Investigation	Begins immediately after law enforcement is notified of the incident.	- Authorities collect evidence such as witness statements, surveillance footage, and forensic reports. - Autopsy findings determine the cause of death and possible contributing factors. - Experts may analyze accident reconstruction or toxicology results.
2. Charging Decision	Prosecutors assess whether the evidence supports criminal charges.	- A determination is made on whether the defendant’s actions constitute criminal negligence. - Charges may range from a misdemeanor to a felony, depending on aggravating circumstances (e.g., use of a weapon, intoxication). - The decision varies by state; for example, California charges negligent homicide as involuntary manslaughter under Penal Code 192(b).
3. Pre-Trial Proceedings	Includes arraignment, plea negotiations, and pre-trial motions.	- Arraignment: The defendant is formally charged and enters a plea (guilty, not guilty, or no contest). - Discovery Process: Both prosecution and defense exchange evidence. - Defense attorneys may file motions to suppress evidence or dismiss charges.
4. Trial Process	If no plea deal is reached, the case proceeds to trial.	- Jury Selection: If applicable, a jury is chosen to hear the case. - Opening Statements: Both prosecution and defense outline their arguments. - Evidence Presentation: Witnesses, forensic experts, and law enforcement officers testify. - Closing Arguments & Jury Deliberation: Final statements are made before the jury decides the verdict.
5. Sentencing Phase	If convicted, the judge imposes a sentence based on state guidelines.	- Aggravating factors (e.g., repeat offenses, use of a deadly weapon) may increase penalties. - Mitigating factors (e.g., first-time offense, demonstrated remorse) may reduce sentencing. - Punishments can include prison time, fines, probation, or community service.
6. Appeal Process	The defendant has the right to challenge a conviction or sentence.	- Appeals typically focus on legal errors such as improper jury instructions or the exclusion of crucial evidence. - Appellate courts review procedural fairness but do not reexamine trial evidence.

Understanding this timeline helps defendants and legal professionals prepare for each step in the criminal justice process when facing negligent homicide charges.

Related Articles:

• What Is Conspiracy to Commit Murder?
• Accessory To Murder Charges

Investigation Process for Negligent Homicide Cases

Understanding how negligent homicide cases are investigated can help individuals involved in such cases navigate the legal process more effectively.

Below is an overview of the common investigative techniques, legal rights, and best practices for preserving evidence during an investigation.

Key Investigation Techniques

Investigating a negligent homicide case involves multiple forensic and legal processes aimed at establishing the facts and determining responsibility.

Law enforcement agencies follow a structured approach to ensure evidence is collected and analyzed accurately. Below are the key techniques used during these investigations.

1. Crime Scene Documentation & Evidence Preservation

• Law enforcement secures the scene to prevent evidence contamination.
• Officers take photographs, create sketches, and document findings to reconstruct the incident.

2. Forensic Evidence Collection

• Investigators gather physical evidence such as clothing, weapons, and DNA samples.
• Advanced forensic techniques like fingerprint analysis, toxicology reports, and ballistics testing help determine the cause of death.

3. Autopsy & Medical Examination

• Medical examiners conduct autopsies to confirm the exact cause of death.
• Toxicology reports may reveal alcohol, drugs, or other substances that contributed to the incident.

4. Witness Interviews & Statements

• Investigators question witnesses, neighbors, or bystanders to piece together the timeline of events.
• Trained interrogators use questioning techniques to gather clear and accurate testimony.

5. Digital Forensics & Surveillance Review

• Law enforcement examines mobile phone records, emails, and social media activity for relevant evidence.
• Security footage from cameras near the scene is analyzed to verify claims and timelines.

6. Reconstructing the Incident

• Crime scene analysts and forensic experts recreate the sequence of events using physical evidence and testimonies.
• This process helps establish whether negligence played a role in the victim's death.

Legal Rights During an Investigation

Anyone involved in a negligent homicide case has legal rights that must be upheld during the investigation:

• Right to Remain Silent – You are not required to answer questions that may incriminate you.
• Right to Legal Representation – You can request an attorney before answering police inquiries.
• Protection Against Unlawful Searches – Law enforcement must obtain a warrant to search personal property unless an emergency justifies an exception.
• Right Against Coercion – Any evidence obtained through intimidation or threats may be inadmissible in court.

When to Seek Legal Counsel

It is important to contact an attorney as soon as possible if you are under investigation for negligent homicide.

Legal representation is especially critical in the following situations:

• Immediately After the Incident – Consulting a lawyer ensures you understand your rights before speaking with authorities.
• Before Answering Police Questions – An attorney can help protect you from self-incrimination.
• If You Are Arrested or Charged – A skilled defense lawyer can challenge the evidence, negotiate charges, and build a strong legal strategy.

Investigations into negligent homicide cases rely on forensic evidence, witness statements, and digital records to establish fault. Understanding your legal rights and responsibilities during an investigation can help protect your interests.

Consulting with an experienced attorney early in the process ensures that your rights are upheld and that you receive proper legal guidance.

See all personal injury and accident lawsuits our lawyers covered so far.

FAQs

Is Negligent Homicide The Same Crime As Vehicular Homicide?

No, negligent homicide is not the same crime as vehicular homicide. Vehicular homicide is when someone operates a motor vehicle in an unsafe manner that causes someone else to die, and it's considered a criminal offense due to criminal negligence with criminal liability.

Is Criminal Negligent Homicide A Misdemeanor?

No, criminally negligent homicide is not a misdemeanor, and it is typically classified as a felony offense.

However, the severity of the criminally negligent homicide charge and corresponding penalties may vary depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances of the case.

What Is The Most Common Cause Of Negligent Homicide?

The most common cause of negligent homicide is reckless driving, medical malpractice, failure to provide adequate care, and workplace accidents.

What Is Another Word For Negligent Homicide?

Another word for negligent homicide is involuntary manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide, depending on the jurisdiction and specific legal definitions.

Consult A Criminal Defense Attorney

If you have been charged with negligent homicide, it is crucial to seek the help of a skilled criminal defense lawyer. They can safeguard your rights and defend your case.

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP our criminal defense attorneys have extensive experience handling negligent homicide cases.

They can provide the guidance and representation you need to achieve the best possible outcome for your case. Contact us today to schedule a free consultation.

---

References:

1. https://www.armfor.uscourts.gov/digest/IIIA85.htm#:~:text=McMurrin%2C%2070%20M.J.%2015%20
2. https://open.lib.umn.edu/criminallaw/chapter/9-6-manslaughter/