FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Accessory To Murder Charges
(Definition, Punishment & Defenses)

Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.


Being charged as an accessory to murder is a serious legal matter that requires a clear understanding of the law and its consequences.

The distinction between being an accessory before the fact (someone who assists or encourages the crime) and after the fact (someone who helps the perpetrator evade justice) can significantly impact the charges and potential penalties.

It’s also important to differentiate between an accomplice, who actively participates in the crime, and an accessory, who may have only provided indirect support.

The legal process varies depending on whether the case falls under state or federal jurisdiction, with penalties differing based on the severity of involvement.

Defense strategies may be available depending on the circumstances, and acting quickly—especially by consulting a qualified criminal defense attorney—is crucial in protecting your rights.

Understanding these key points will help in navigating this complex legal situation and making informed decisions about your case.

Quick Summary

  • If found guilty of this criminal act, you might be incarcerated in either jail or state prison for up to three years and have to pay a maximum fine amounting up to $5,000.
  • Assisting the person who did commit murder is classified as an accessory after the fact.
  • According to California Penal Code 31PC, helping a criminal before their offense is commonly referred to as "aiding and abetting."

What is an Accessory to Murder?

A lawyer explaining to a client what an accessory to murder is

An accessory to murder is aiding to murder another person, even if one did not commit murder.

The legal system distinguishes between different levels of involvement in a crime. One significant classification is an accessory to a crime, specifically murder.

According to the law, an "accessory" is someone who actively supports or assists in committing a crime. This can be categorized into two primary types: accessory before the fact and accessory after the fact [1].

Accessory Before the Fact vs. Accessory After the Fact

An accessory before the fact refers to someone who aids or abets a crime before it occurs. This includes actions such as helping plan the crime, providing weapons, or giving instructions on carrying out the offense.

For instance, if a person assists another in selecting a murder weapon to be used against a partner or family member, they are legally complicit in any resulting crime.

Conversely, an accessory after the fact involves aiding a person after a crime has been committed. This includes actions such as hiding the perpetrator, destroying evidence, or providing false alibis.

Even though an accessory after the fact did not participate in the crime itself, they can still face legal consequences for obstructing justice or aiding a criminal.

Under California Penal Code 31PC, aiding and abetting before a crime occurs can lead to severe charges. To be held liable, the individual must have been aware that the person they were assisting either intended to commit a crime or had already committed one.

Comparison of Legal Distinctions

The following is a breakdown of key differences in accessory charges compared to other criminal law concepts:

Category Accessory Before the Fact Accessory After the Fact Accessory vs. Accomplice Accessory vs. Conspiracy Principal vs. Accessory Roles Misdemeanor vs. Felony Charges
Definition Aids or abets before a crime is committed Aids after a crime has been committed Accessory aids before; accomplice aids during the crime Conspiracy involves an agreement to commit a crime Principal commits the crime; accessory assists Misdemeanors are less serious, felonies are more severe
Presence at Crime Not present during the crime Not present during the crime Accomplice is present and participates Conspirators may not be present at the crime Principal is the main actor; accessory provides support Misdemeanors typically carry lighter penalties
Legal Consequences Faces similar penalties to the principal Generally faces lesser penalties Both can face serious charges, but accomplices may face harsher penalties Conspirators can be charged even if the crime was not completed Accessories can be charged similarly to principals Felonies carry harsher sentences, including prison time
Knowledge Requirement Must know about the intended crime Must know about the completed crime Must have knowledge of the crime Knowledge of conspiracy intent required Principals must commit a crime; accessories must assist Misdemeanors often result in fines or short jail time

Related Article: Domestic Violence Offense Classes

Legal Consequences and Sentencing

When someone aids in a crime, they are classified as an abettor, while the main perpetrator is the principal offender. Criminal law treats accessories with significant seriousness. In some cases, an accessory can face the same legal consequences as the main offender.

For example, in certain jurisdictions, an accessory to murder may receive a sentence of up to fifteen years in state prison, depending on the level of involvement.

Understanding the distinctions between different legal roles is crucial when dealing with accessory charges. Whether someone aids before or after a crime, their actions can have severe legal implications.

These differences can impact defense strategies and potential legal outcomes in court, making it essential to have a clear understanding of the law when facing such charges.

Related Article: Self-Defense Murder Explained

What Is The Punishment For Accessory To Murder?

A lawyer holding a gavel in an office

The punishment for being an accessory to murder vary based on the severity of the crime and how the charge is classified.

An individual who is found guilty of aiding and abetting before a crime occurs may face the same legal consequences as the principal offender. In cases of murder, this could mean life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

On the other hand, accessory after the fact is considered a "wobbler" offense, meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the defendant’s criminal record and the specifics of the case.

Punishments for Accessory Before the Fact

  • Being an accessory before the fact is legally equivalent to aiding and abetting a crime.
  • If found guilty, the punishment aligns with the principal crime, potentially leading to life in state prison for murder cases.
  • In some jurisdictions, this charge could also result in the death penalty, depending on the circumstances and state laws.

Punishments for Accessory After the Fact

  • If charged as a misdemeanor, penalties include:
    • Up to one year in county jail
    • Fines up to $5,000
  • If charged as a felony, punishments become more severe:
    • Up to three years in state prison
    • Fines reaching $5,000
    • A criminal record, which can have long-term consequences on employment and civil rights.

Factors That Influence Sentencing

Several elements determine whether an accessory charge leads to a lighter sentence or a harsher penalty:

  1. Level of Involvement – Providing direct assistance before the crime (such as supplying weapons or planning the act) often results in a sentence equal to that of the principal offender.
  2. Prior Criminal History – A defendant with previous convictions is more likely to receive a felony charge and a longer prison sentence.
  3. Nature of the Crime – If the principal crime is particularly violent or involves multiple victims, penalties for accessories may be harsher.
  4. Cooperation with Authorities – Those who assist in the investigation or provide key information may have their charges reduced.

Related Article: How Long Does a Felony Stay On Your Record?

Accessory to murder before the murder is known as "aiding and abetting." It is practically the same as being an accomplice. If you are convicted of this crime, you could face the same penalties as the person who did the act
- Michael Simmrin, Trial Lawyer

Legal Consequences and Long-Term Impact

A conviction as an accessory to murder carries lasting consequences beyond imprisonment and fines. Felony charges can lead to the loss of certain civil rights, such as voting or firearm ownership. Additionally, a criminal record may significantly limit employment opportunities and future housing options.

For those facing these charges, securing legal representation is critical. An experienced attorney can examine the details of the case and explore potential defense strategies, such as proving lack of knowledge or intent.

By understanding the legal distinctions and consequences associated with accessory charges, individuals can better navigate their defense and legal rights.

Also Read: Examples of Second Degree Murder in California

Common Defenses To Accessory To Murder 

An attorney reading a law book on defenses

Mounting a strong legal defense is essential when facing charges as an accessory to murder.

The right approach depends on the specifics of the case, including the level of involvement, the available evidence, and the applicable legal standards.

The following are several common defense strategies, along with explanations of the required evidence, legal burden, historical case precedents, and potential challenges.

Lack of Knowledge of the Principal’s Criminal Intent

One of the most effective defenses is proving that the accused had no knowledge of the principal’s intent to commit murder or was unaware that a crime had even occurred.

  • Evidence Required: Testimony, communications, and other proof demonstrating that the defendant had no knowledge of criminal activity.
  • Burden of Proof: The prosecution must establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knowingly assisted the crime. If the defense raises reasonable doubt, it may lead to acquittal.
  • Effectiveness: This strategy works well when strong evidence supports the claim of unawareness, particularly in cases where the defendant had no prior connection to the crime.
  • Challenges: The prosecution may present circumstantial evidence suggesting the accused was aware of or complicit in the crime, making it crucial to counteract these claims.

Proving the Principal Was Not Guilty of Murder

If the principal is not guilty of murder, then the charge of accessory to murder becomes invalid. This defense argues that the principal either did not commit the crime or had legal justification, such as self-defense.

  • Evidence Required: Autopsy reports, forensic evidence, eyewitness accounts, or video footage that supports a self-defense claim or contradicts the prosecution’s version of events.
  • Burden of Proof: The prosecution must prove the principal committed murder beyond a reasonable doubt. If the defense establishes that the principal’s actions were justified or that no crime occurred, the charges can be dismissed.
  • Effectiveness: This strategy can be highly effective in cases involving self-defense or wrongful accusations.
  • Challenges: If the prosecution has strong evidence against the principal, proving that no crime took place can be difficult.

Duress as a Defense

Duress occurs when an individual is forced to participate in a crime under the threat of immediate harm or death [2].

  • Evidence Required: Proof of threats made against the defendant, such as messages, witness testimony, or law enforcement reports.
  • Burden of Proof: While the prosecution must prove guilt, the defense must provide sufficient evidence that the defendant acted under coercion.
  • Effectiveness: This defense can be persuasive in cases where the defendant had no choice but to comply with the principal’s demands.
  • Challenges: Proving duress is difficult if there is no documentation of threats. Prosecutors may argue that the defendant had alternatives or opportunities to report the crime.

False Accusation or Mistaken Identity

Some defendants are falsely accused due to personal vendettas, misidentification, or errors in the investigation.

  • Evidence Required: Alibi witnesses, surveillance footage, forensic reports, and inconsistencies in witness statements that prove wrongful accusation.
  • Burden of Proof: While the prosecution must prove involvement in the crime, the defense must provide sufficient evidence to create reasonable doubt.
  • Effectiveness: This strategy can be highly successful when there is concrete proof that the defendant was not involved in the crime.
  • Challenges: If the prosecution has multiple witnesses implicating the accused, it may be difficult to dispute the allegations without strong counter-evidence.

Withdrawal from Criminal Activity

If a person initially assisted in the crime but later withdrew from participation and made efforts to prevent the crime, they may argue that they are no longer legally responsible.

  • Evidence Required: Proof of attempts to stop the crime, such as messages discouraging participation or contacting law enforcement.
  • Burden of Proof: The defendant must prove they made a genuine effort to withdraw from involvement before the crime occurred.
  • Effectiveness: This defense can work if the defendant’s withdrawal is well-documented and proactive steps were taken to prevent the crime.
  • Challenges: Simply leaving a criminal plan without taking further action may not be enough to establish withdrawal in court.

Seeking the counsel of an experienced attorney is essential in building a strong case and increasing the chances of a favorable outcome.

Understanding these legal defenses can make a significant difference in the courtroom and help mitigate potential penalties.

Related Articles:

See all personal injury and accident lawsuits our lawyers have covered so far.

Evidence Requirements for Accessory to Murder Charges

For the prosecution to secure a conviction in an accessory to murder case, they must present compelling evidence that proves the defendant's involvement beyond a reasonable doubt.

This can include direct, circumstantial, testimonial, or physical evidence, each carrying varying degrees of weight in court.

Direct Evidence

This type of evidence provides an explicit link between the defendant and the crime.

Examples include:

  • Eyewitness testimony confirming the defendant's involvement.
  • Video footage showing the defendant aiding the principal offender.
  • Written or recorded confessions.

Circumstantial Evidence

While not direct proof, circumstantial evidence can strongly suggest involvement when multiple pieces align.

Examples include:

  • DNA, fingerprints, or forensic evidence tying the defendant to the crime scene.
  • Text messages, emails, or call logs indicating knowledge or planning of the crime.
  • Unusual behavior, such as fleeing after the crime or providing false statements.

Witness Testimony

Statements from those who observed or have knowledge of the crime can be key in proving accessory involvement.

Examples include:

    • Eyewitnesses who saw the defendant assisting the crime.
    • Accomplices who testify in exchange for reduced sentences.

Physical Evidence

Tangible objects linking the defendant to the crime scene or the principal offender can significantly impact a case.

Examples include:

  • Weapons traced back to the accessory.
  • Blood, clothing fibers, or gunpowder residue connecting them to the crime.
  • Items linked to planning, such as maps or tools.

Each type of evidence plays a role in proving or disputing accessory to murder charges. While direct evidence carries the most weight, circumstantial, witness, and physical evidence can collectively build a case.

FAQs

How Do States Define Murder?

States define murder as the malicious taking of human life, which can be categorized into two degrees. These are first-degree murder and second-degree murder, which carry severe penalties in most jurisdictions.

Is Accessory Same As Conspiracy?

No, accessory and conspiracy are two distinct offenses in criminal law. A conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime. On the other hand, accessory involves assisting a perpetrator before, during, or after committing the crime.

What Is Considered An Accessory?

An accessory is considered when someone assists a perpetrator before, during, or after the commission of a crime. This can include helping plan the crime and providing moral support by not intervening in unlawful acts. 

Is Accessory Same As Accomplice?

No, an accessory is not the same as an accomplice. Contrary to an accessory, which is rarely present at the scene of a crime, an accomplice often participates in its execution. This is one of the most fundamental differences between these two terms.

What are the charges for being an accessory to murder? 

The charges for being an accessory to murder can vary but typically include severe penalties such as long-term imprisonment, especially if the person is deemed an accessory before or after the fact.

Need To Speak To A Criminal Defense Lawyer?

There are several ways to defend yourself against accessory to murder allegations. These include claims such as lack of intent, duress, and the simple fact that the principal offender did not kill anyone.

That is why talking to an experienced criminal defense lawyer at Schmidt & Clark, LLP can help you develop a defense strategy to increase your chances of obtaining a favorable outcome. Contact our criminal defense lawyers today for a free consultation session.


References:

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/accessory
  2. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/duress