FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Utah Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
If you or someone you know has experienced complications from hernia mesh, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is here to help. Recognized for our expertise in plaintiff representation, our primary goal is to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you’re entitled to.

Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review

Quick Summary

  • Navigating the Legal Landscape: This section offers a comprehensive overview of Utah’s hernia mesh lawsuit environment, emphasizing the significance of recent verdicts. Understanding these outcomes is vital for anyone looking to pursue a claim, as they set precedents that could affect your case.
  • Eligibility for Compensation: Learn about the criteria used to determine eligibility for compensation in hernia mesh lawsuits in Utah. This includes the type of complications experienced, the timeframe for filing a lawsuit, and the connection between the hernia mesh and your injuries.
  • Filing a Claim: Get insights into the step-by-step process of filing a hernia mesh claim in Utah, from gathering necessary documentation to selecting the right legal representation. This guide also explores the factors that might impact the settlement outcome, helping you set realistic expectations for your case.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

The number of hernia mesh lawsuits, including bard hernia mesh lawsuit cases, is increasing. With thousands of these cases pending nationwide, Utah residents are notably active as plaintiffs seeking compensation for injuries.

These lawsuits are primarily directed against manufacturers of hernia mesh products. They claim that these products were defective, inadequately tested, and failed to warn about potential risks.

The scope of these lawsuits ranges from individual cases to large multidistrict litigation (MDL). MDLs allow for the consolidation of similar lawsuits, streamlining the legal process and potentially influencing settlement amounts.

Amidst all this, Utah has become a significant battleground, with hernia mesh victims turning to courts seeking justice.

The surge in hernia mesh lawsuits is a reflection of the widespread complications experienced by patients across the country.

These complications, often severe, have had a profound impact on patients’ lives, leading to additional surgeries, chronic pain, and even life-threatening conditions.

What Is Hernia Mesh?

According to a 2023 notice from the FDA, hernia mesh is a medical device commonly utilized in hernia repair surgeries to lend additional support to weakened or damaged tissue [1].

Often referred to as surgical mesh, it is typically constructed from synthetic materials that may be absorbable, non-absorbable, or a hybrid of the two, aimed at reinforcing or bridging the affected area during the healing process.

However, the problem lies not with the concept of hernia mesh itself but with specific types and brands that have been linked to complications.

Various hernia mesh implants, including those made by Atrium, Ethicon, and Covidien, among others, have led to lawsuits in Utah.

Complications have been linked to synthetic non-degradable meshes, which have higher rates of causing adhesions and are not recommended for use in infected areas.

Therefore, the issue stems not from hernia mesh as a general medical device but from specific products and manufacturers. And with a variety of implicated products, it’s evident that these complications are widespread across different products and manufacturers.

Latest Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates

For victims seeking justice, it’s essential to stay updated on the latest hernia mesh lawsuit developments. The landscape is continually changing, with new cases being filed, bellwether trials being scheduled, and settlement negotiations taking place.

A vital area to monitor is the progress of MDLs. These consolidated cases often set the tone for individual cases, and early verdicts can often influence settlement negotiations for hundreds or even thousands of similar cases.

The current MDLs involving hernia mesh products are proceeding in federal courts, with several hernia mesh trial bellwether cases already completed and others scheduled in the coming months.

The outcomes of these trials provide valuable insight into how future cases may be resolved and can influence settlement amounts for Utah cases.

The Role of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Utah Cases

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) plays a crucial role in handling hernia mesh lawsuits. By consolidating similar cases, MDL streamlines the legal process, making it more efficient.

This is particularly important in situations like the hernia mesh litigation, where thousands of patients nationwide have filed lawsuits.

For Utah victims, being part of a hernia mesh MDL can have several benefits. It allows for the sharing of resources among plaintiffs, can lead to more consistent rulings, and may influence the size of settlement amounts.

However, each case within an MDL is still considered individually when it comes to determining damages, so individual facts and circumstances remain crucial.

Why Are People Filing Hernia Mesh Lawsuits?

People are filing hernia mesh lawsuits because they claim that manufacturers have promoted defective products. These products allegedly have manufacturing flaws and design errors.

For example, Bard’s Composix® Kugel Hernia Patch was notably prone to breakage due to its memory recoil ring, which could lead to product malfunction.

Another critical allegation is that hernia mesh products were inadequately tested before being released to the market, contributing to the high rate of complications following hernia repair surgery.

This lack of adequate testing and quality control has led to numerous patients experiencing serious complications after their hernia repair surgeries and, consequently, an increase in hernia mesh claims.

Moreover, lawsuits allege that manufacturers, including Bard and Atrium Medical, failed to provide adequate warnings to patients and healthcare providers about the potential risks and complications of using their hernia mesh products.

This failure to inform has left many patients unaware of the potential risks they were taking when opting for hernia mesh repair surgery.

Complications Named in the Lawsuits

According to 2020 research by Science Direct, the complications named in hernia mesh lawsuits range from chronic pain to life-threatening conditions. Some common complications include [2]:

These complications can seriously affect a patient’s quality of life and ability to perform daily activities.

Infections are another serious complication associated with hernia mesh. These infections can be acute or chronic, sometimes presenting years after the surgery. In many cases, these infections lead to inflammation and necessitate the removal of the mesh.

Other complications include hernia mesh migration, where the mesh moves from its original placement, potentially leading to organ perforation or adhesion to internal tissues. Some patients have also experienced rejection of the synthetic mesh.

Additionally, complications such as adhesions and bowel obstruction have been reported, presenting risks that range from discomfort to potential emergency surgeries.

Studies have shown that surgical mesh can reduce the rate of hernia recurrence. However, some hernia mesh also has a high failure rate and can cause severe or even life-threatening complications. – National Library of Medicine

Who Qualifies To File a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?

Those who have experienced severe complications as a result of their hernia repair surgeries qualify to file a hernia mesh lawsuit. However, not all patients who have had hernia repair are eligible to file a lawsuit.

Eligibility is contingent upon the existence of significant damage that is demonstrably linked to the hernia mesh implanted during the operation. Those who can substantiate their claims of considerable injury resulting from the mesh are qualified to file a lawsuit.

Specifically, to qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit, individuals must have undergone surgery on or after January 1, 2006, and suffered from complications requiring revision surgery.

It’s also worth noting that even if a victim’s hernia mesh claim was previously declined or discharged by another firm, they may still be eligible to receive legal assistance.

The legal process for a hernia mesh claim includes verifying eligibility and building a case with evidence, which may involve negotiations for settlements or presenting the case at trial.

Though there may be time constraints to file a claim, victims have the option to join existing MDL or class action lawsuits, which could potentially increase their chances of gaining compensation.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Utah

Settlement amounts in Utah hernia mesh lawsuits vary greatly, with some cases resulting in substantial compensation for plaintiffs.

Hernia mesh lawsuit settlements and verdicts in Utah have involved significant financial compensation for plaintiffs, with certain cases resulting in awards ranging from substantial figures to potentially millions of dollars.

The factors affecting settlement amounts in hernia mesh litigations include:

  • The severity of the plaintiff’s injuries.
  • The employment impact is due to missed work and future earning capacity.
  • The extent of pain and suffering endured.

All of these factors are evaluated to arrive at a just compensation amount.

Potential Compensation for Victims of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits in Utah

Victims of hernia mesh complications in Utah may seek compensation for a variety of damages, including:

  • Medical bills
  • Lost wages
  • Rehabilitation costs
  • Physical pain and suffering
  • Emotional distress
  • Loss in quality of life

Settlement amounts in hernia mesh lawsuits can vary and are calculated based on factors such as accrued medical bills, the severity of the injury, lost wages due to the inability to work, and the extent of physical and emotional suffering.

Some estimates suggest that Ethicon hernia mesh plaintiffs could receive around $70,000, while Bard hernia mesh plaintiffs might expect around $80,000. However, these amounts can vary depending on the specifics of individual cases.

In the MDL for Atrium C-Qur Mesh, over 2,500 cases were pending as of 2021, with plaintiffs seeking compensation for injuries such as:

  • infections
  • mesh rejection
  • chronic pain
  • additional surgeries

This shows that many victims in Utah are seeking and receiving compensation for the severe complications caused by defective hernia mesh implants in hernia mesh cases.

Filing a Utah Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

There are several steps involved in filing a hernia mesh lawsuit in Utah. First, victims need to verify their eligibility for a lawsuit. This involves confirming that they meet the criteria discussed earlier, such as having undergone hernia mesh repair surgery after January 1, 2006, and experiencing significant complications.

Next, victims need to build a case with the help of an experienced hernia mesh lawyer. This involves:

  • Gathering evidence, including medical records and expert testimony, to prove that the hernia mesh caused the complications and that the manufacturer is liable.
  • Going through a complex and time-consuming process.
  • Being guided through every step of the process by experienced hernia mesh lawyers.

Lastly, the lawsuit may involve negotiations for settlements or presenting the case at trial. While many cases are settled out of court, some may go to trial, where a judge or jury will determine the outcome of the case.

Types of Evidence To Present

Presenting strong evidence is vital when filing a hernia mesh lawsuit. The types of evidence used in hernia mesh lawsuits often include:

  • Medical records documenting the initial procedure
  • Medical records documenting the complications experienced
  • Medical records documenting the treatments received subsequently

Additionally, expert testimony may also be used to explain how the hernia mesh caused the complications. This could be from medical experts familiar with hernia mesh complications or from professionals who can testify about the impacts of the complications on the victim’s life, such as loss of earning capacity.

Utah Statute of Limitation

The statute of limitations is a critical factor to consider when filing a hernia mesh lawsuit. In Utah, the statute of limitations for filing a hernia mesh lawsuit is 2 years from the day that the harm occurred. This means that victims have a limited timeframe within which they must take legal action.

Related Articles:

See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered severe pain or injury from a defective medical device?

Get Your Free Consultation From Utah Hernia Mesh Lawyers

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we stand by your side during challenging times. Suffering from hernia mesh complications can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone.

Our seasoned legal team specializes in these types of cases and will navigate you through every step of the legal journey. We’re here to clarify your legal options and assess whether you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit.

We offer complimentary consultations, and our services are contingency-based, meaning you pay nothing unless we triumph in your case.



Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.