FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Tennessee Hernia Mesh Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
If you or someone you know has experienced complications from hernia mesh, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is here to help. Recognized for our expertise in plaintiff representation, our primary goal is to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you’re entitled to.

Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review

Quick Summary

  • Eligibility Criteria: Understanding whether you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit in Tennessee is the first crucial step. This encompasses identifying the nature of your complications, aligning them with Tennessee’s legal standards, and ensuring your case falls within the statute of limitations.
  • Recent Legal Developments: Stay updated with the latest advancements in hernia mesh litigation within Tennessee. Knowledge of new legal precedents and how they influence litigation strategies can be pivotal for the success of your case.
  • Compensation Expectations: Get acquainted with the types of compensation you might expect, including medical costs, lost earnings, and pain and suffering. Having realistic expectations about potential awards can help guide your decision to pursue legal action.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

In the scenic landscapes of Tennessee, a legal storm has been brewing, one that’s intimately tied to the lives of many individuals who’ve faced hernia mesh complications.

Hernia mesh lawsuits have surged, with patients uniting to seek justice for the suffering they’ve endured. At the heart of this battle are the hernia mesh products, surgical instruments designed to repair hernias that have led to a myriad of legal cases due to their alleged defects.

What Is Hernia Mesh?

According to a 2023 notice from the FDA, hernia mesh is akin to a patch within the body, a medical device intended to reinforce or close openings left by hernias [1]. Predominantly crafted from synthetic materials, this surgical mesh acts as scaffolding for new tissue to grow and stabilize the affected area.

However, not all hernia meshes are created equal. Some are absorbable and dissolve over time, while others are designed to be permanent fixtures within the body. There’s also a type made from animal tissues, designed to be absorbable and offer an alternative to synthetic options.

The value of surgical hernia mesh in hernia surgery cannot be understated – it’s revolutionized hernia repair, reducing recurrence rates and aiding faster recoveries.

Not every surgical site is fit for mesh and emphasizing the importance of a surgeon’s expertise. When things go awry, defective manufacturing can become a legal liability, a stark reminder that with innovation comes responsibility. – The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Latest Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates

The tides are shifting in the legal seas of hernia mesh litigation. In a groundbreaking move, Tennessee’s Attorney General announced a multistate settlement where Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon must pay for deceptive marketing practices.

Tennessee’s share of the settlement is a cool $2.6 million. Atrium, not to be left out, has offered a substantial global settlement, potentially offering a glimmer of resolution to the thousands caught in the legal net.

Bard, too, has felt the weight of justice in previous years, doling out millions to settle Kugel hernia patch lawsuits. Yet, as of this year, no global settlement has been announced for the ongoing Bard MDL, leaving thousands of cases pending.

The legal landscape is unpredictable, with figures ranging from $65,000 to $1 million per case, making each development a crucial chess move in this high-stakes game.

The Role of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Tennessee Cases

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) has become a pivotal battlefield in the war against hernia mesh complications. Tennessee plaintiffs find themselves in the thick of the hernia mesh MDL, with bellwether trials setting the tone for future settlements.

These test cases streamline pretrial proceedings and potentially expedite justice for those watching closely from the Volunteer State.

The appointment of a settlement mediator within the Bard MDL suggests a potential endgame is near, a beacon of hope for those entangled in the mesh of litigation. Yet, this process is not without its trials, both literal and figurative.

Tennessee plaintiffs continue to face the consequences of delayed justice and the financial burden of ongoing medical costs, waiting for the day when their struggles are acknowledged and compensated.

Why Are People Filing Hernia Mesh Lawsuits?

People are filing hernia mesh lawsuits because the heart of the matter lies in a deep sense of betrayal; allegations suggest that these companies were aware of the risks but chose silence over patient safety.

This silence has transformed into a chorus of voices demanding accountability and seeking reparations for the damages endured.

Compensation is more than just a monetary value; it’s a symbol of justice for those who’ve suffered. It encompasses medical expenses, lost wages, and the intangible pain and suffering endured.

The Bard MDL in Tennessee reflects this fight. A mediation plan is in place, and new trials are being pushed, all in pursuit of reasonable settlement offers and a chance to turn the page on this painful chapter.

The complexity of these lawsuits necessitates legal expertise, with the average settlement value offering a benchmark for what might be expected. However, every case is as unique as the individuals behind them, each with their own story of pain and perseverance.

Complications Named in the Lawsuits

According to a 2020 research by Science Direct, the repercussions of defective hernia mesh are not just a matter of discomfort; they can be life-altering. Some of the complications named in lawsuits include [2]:

  • Chronic pain
  • A stiff abdomen
  • Constipation
  • The inability to pass the gas
  • Bowel obstruction
  • The bulge of a recurrent hernia
  • Infection lurking beneath the surface

These physical manifestations of a failed hernia mesh implant can lead to serious hernia mesh injuries and increase the risk of hernia recurrence.

Radiologists play detective, their CT scans revealing the tell-tale signs of mesh migration, a grim indicator of complications.

The consequences don’t stop at physical symptoms; sexual dysfunction and emotional distress can stem from the very device meant to offer relief. With each complication, the case for legal action grows stronger, the list of grievances fueling the drive for justice.

Who Qualifies To File a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?

Individuals who have undergone hernia repair surgery using mesh after January 1, 2006, and suffered from severe post-hernia mesh surgery complications, or those who have had to face additional surgeries to correct initial mesh-related issues, may qualify to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.

The eligibility checklist for mesh implant litigation includes the following:

  • The type of mesh implanted, with products from companies like Ethicon, Atrium, Covidien, or Bard Davol, taking center stage
  • Surgeries before 2006 may exclude you from litigation.
  • The absence of qualifying injuries may exclude you from litigation.
  • A non-qualifying manufacturer may exclude you from litigation.

It’s a complex puzzle, with pieces that include medical evidence and legal criteria, all navigating the labyrinth of the statute of limitations.

Key Players: Manufacturers in the Spotlight

In the arena of hernia mesh litigation, a few manufacturers stand out, their names echoing through courtrooms and across legal documents. The giants whose products have led to the current legal maelstrom are:

  • Bard
  • Gore
  • Ethicon
  • Atrium

As lawsuits mount, so do allegations of inadequate design, manufacturing flaws, and failure to warn of risks.

The legal landscape is dotted with significant settlements and verdicts, including:

  • Bard’s $184 million global settlement for Kugel Mesh lawsuits
  • The largest individual settlement of $4.8 million against Bard
  • Covidien facing over 5,700 lawsuits in Massachusetts state courts, and a meticulous review of more than a million documents

The bellwether trials, significant as they are, offer a glimpse into how juries might respond, influencing the negotiation dynamics for thousands of cases.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Tennessee

Settlement amounts in hernia mesh lawsuits are as varied as the complications they seek to address. Legal experts pinpoint the average range between $65,000 to $80,000, but in extraordinary circumstances, awards can soar to $1 million.

The factors influencing these figures are multifaceted:

  • Injury severity
  • Medical expenses
  • Impact on quality of life
  • Strength of the plaintiff’s case

The journey to a resolution is seldom swift, with some cases taking years to close, contingent on the manufacturer’s readiness to negotiate. Notable verdicts like the $500,000 in the Stinson case or the $4.8 million awarded against Bard showcase the potential highs of settlement amounts.

Yet, each case is a unique narrative, with outcomes influenced by a myriad of legal and personal factors.

Potential Compensation for Victims of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits in Tennessee

For those trapped in hernia mesh lawsuits, compensation is the lifeline that offers a semblance of normalcy. It aims to cover the extensive medical expenses incurred, the wages lost to time away from work, and the immeasurable pain and suffering endured.

In certain cases, punitive damages also come into play, such as a financial reprimand for the manufacturers’ misconduct.

Filing a Tennessee Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Embarking on a hernia mesh lawsuit in Tennessee is no simple feat. It requires meticulous evidence gathering, settlement mediation, and potentially facing a trial. Settlement discussions can occur at any stage, with most cases resolving before ever reaching a courtroom.

However, if a settlement proves elusive, the legal process may mandate progress updates and deadlines, adding pressure to an already tense situation.

Types of Evidence To Present

The bedrock of any hernia mesh lawsuit is the evidence presented. Medical records detailing the surgery, imaging studies like X-rays or MRIs, personal accounts of pain, witness testimonies, financial records, and photographic evidence all merge to form a compelling case.

The more thorough the documentation, from mesh implant types to details of the operation, the stronger the case presented in court.

Tennessee Statute of Limitation

The clock is always ticking in legal matters, and hernia mesh lawsuits in Tennessee are no exception.

The state enforces a one-year statute of limitations for hernia mesh claims, starting from the day the injury was discovered or should have been discovered.

Related Articles:

See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered severe pain or injury from a defective medical device?

Get Your Free Consultation From Tennessee Hernia Mesh Lawyers

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we stand by your side during challenging times. Should you or someone you care about suffer from the repercussions of hernia mesh complications, we are here to assist. Our attorneys are well-versed in hernia mesh cases and will provide the guidance you need through every step of the legal journey.

We are dedicated to helping you recognize your legal options and assess your eligibility for a hernia mesh lawsuit. Our consultations are complimentary, with no fees charged unless we secure a victory in your case.



Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.