At Schmidt & Clark, we are dedicated to helping individuals who have suffered due to defective hernia mesh implants.
Our experienced legal team is here to guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve. Contact Schmidt & Clark today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.
Table Of Contents
- Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Overview
- Latest Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates
- FDA Reports and Statistics
- Nevada Hernia Mesh Injuries & Side Effects
- Do You Qualify for a Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?
- Nevada Hernia Mesh Recall Information
- Statute of Limitations for Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- FAQs
- 1. What should I do if I experience complications from a hernia mesh implant?
- 2. How can I determine if my hernia mesh patch was recalled?
- 3. What legal claims are commonly made in hernia mesh lawsuits?
- 4. What is the typical settlement amount for Nevada hernia mesh lawsuits?
- 5. Which manufacturers are most commonly involved in hernia mesh lawsuits?
- 6. How long does it take to resolve a hernia mesh lawsuit in Nevada?
- 7. What is the role of multidistrict litigation in Nevada hernia mesh cases?
- 8. Can I file a lawsuit if my hernia mesh surgery was successful initially?
- 9. What types of evidence are most important in hernia mesh lawsuits?
- 10. Are there any exclusions for filing a hernia mesh lawsuit?
- Get a Free Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers
Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Overview
Nevada hernia mesh lawsuits are product liability cases involving defective medical devices used in hernia repair surgeries that cause serious complications and injuries to patients.
The primary allegations against manufacturers include defective design, inadequate warnings about associated risks, and failure to properly test mesh products before market release.
Over 25,000 hernia mesh lawsuits are currently pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL), with Nevada cases being handled through this consolidated process.
The manufacturers embroiled in these lawsuits are not small, unknown entities. They’re leading medical device companies, including:
- Atrium Medical
- C.R. Bard
- Covidien
- Ethicon
- W.L. Gore & Associates
Each of these manufacturers has been accused of producing hernia mesh implants that have resulted in a range of complications, leading to litigation and an increase in hernia mesh cases.
Latest Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates
- June 2025 – About 25,015 hernia mesh lawsuits are currently pending in multidistrict litigation, with Nevada cases being consolidated for efficient claim resolution. The sheer scale of these cases reflects the importance of patients understanding their legal rights and the widespread nature of hernia mesh complications [1].
- 2018 – Becton Dickinson’s subsidiary C.R. Bard’s hernia mesh injuries led to the creation of Multi-District Litigations (MDLs) to handle the numerous claims. These hernia MDLs help streamline the litigation process, ensuring that every plaintiff gets their day in court [2].
- 2016– Ethicon’s Physiomesh was subject to a worldwide recall after being linked to complications such as recurrent hernias, mesh migration, infection, bleeding, and chronic pain. This recall highlights the serious safety concerns with certain mesh products [3].
- June 2011 – C.R. Bard agreed to pay $184 million to settle state and federal lawsuits, translating to an average of about $70,000 per claim. This settlement demonstrates the significant financial liability manufacturers face for defective hernia mesh products [4].
FDA Reports and Statistics
The FDA has documented significant safety concerns with hernia mesh products through various reporting mechanisms:
- Over 25,000 lawsuits currently pending in multidistrict litigation nationwide
- Multiple manufacturer recalls including Ethicon Physiomesh worldwide recall
- $184 million settlement by C.R. Bard averaging $70,000 per claim
- Various product lines affected including Atrium C-Qur, Bard 3DMax/Kugel/Ventralex, Covidien Parietex/Parietene, and Gore DualMesh
- Qualification period covers surgeries from January 1, 2006 to present
According to the National Library of Medicine, symptoms of complications can arise months or years after the implant surgery, with patients experiencing extreme symptoms that are easy to identify or mild signs that are more difficult to diagnose.
Nevada Hernia Mesh Injuries & Side Effects
Nevada patients with defective hernia mesh implants have experienced a wide range of serious complications that often require revision surgery and ongoing medical intervention.
These complications can occur immediately after surgery or develop months to years later, significantly impacting patients’ quality of life.
- Chronic Pain: Persistent abdominal pain and discomfort that interferes with daily activities
- Mesh Migration: Movement of the mesh from its original position, potentially causing damage to surrounding organs
- Infections: Serious bacterial infections that can become chronic and require extended treatment
- Bowel Obstruction: Blockage of the intestines that can be life-threatening and requires emergency surgery
- Organ or Tissue Perforation: Puncture or damage to internal organs caused by mesh migration or erosion
- Adhesions: Development of scar tissue that can cause organs to stick together abnormally
- Hernia Recurrence: Return of the original hernia due to mesh failure requiring additional surgery
- Allergic Reactions: Immune system responses to mesh materials causing inflammation and tissue damage
- Sexual Dysfunction: Complications affecting sexual function and quality of life
- Mesh Failure: Complete breakdown or deterioration of the mesh material
Do You Qualify for a Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?
You may qualify for a Nevada hernia mesh lawsuit if:
- You underwent hernia repair surgery with mesh on or after January 1, 2006
- You experienced serious side effects including adhesions, hernia recurrence, intestinal blockage, mesh migration, infections, chronic pain, or organ perforation
- The injuries required medical treatment, revision surgery, or hospitalization
- You can provide medical documentation linking your injuries to the hernia mesh device
- Your complications occurred at least 30 days post-surgery
- You received mesh implants manufactured by Ethicon, Atrium, Covidien, or Bard Davol
Those who required hernia revision surgery or another type of surgery as a result of complications from the mesh implant could also qualify for legal action. Note that surgeries that occurred before January 1, 2006, or injuries happening within 30 days post-surgery are typically excluded.
Sometimes symptoms of complications can arise months or years after the implant surgery. Patients may have extreme symptoms that are easy to identify or mild signs that are more difficult to diagnose. In some cases, it’s possible to have multiple symptoms simultaneously. – National Library of Medicine
Evidence Required for a Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
To build a solid case, you need strong evidence.
This includes:
- Medical Records: Documentation related to the initial implant surgery and follow-up visits
- Imaging Studies: X-rays, CT scans, or MRI results showing mesh complications
- Expert Testimony: Medical expert opinions linking your injuries to the defective mesh
- Personal Records: Pain diaries documenting ongoing symptoms and their impact on daily life
- Photographic Evidence: Visual documentation of complications or surgical sites
- Product Identification: Documentation identifying the specific mesh product and manufacturer
Scientific evidence and testimonies from expert witnesses are particularly crucial in proving the defectiveness of hernia mesh in lawsuits.
Damages You Can Recover
Compensation in Nevada hernia mesh lawsuits may include:
- Medical Expenses: Past and future costs for revision surgeries, hospitalizations, medications, and ongoing medical care.
- Lost Wages: Income lost due to inability to work during recovery and treatment periods.
- Pain and Suffering: Compensation for physical pain, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life.
- Punitive Damages: Additional damages intended to punish defendants for wrongdoing.
- Permanent Disabilities: Compensation for lasting impairments or disfigurement.
- Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Damages for inability to participate in activities you once enjoyed.
Nevada Hernia Mesh Recall Information
Several hernia mesh products have been subject to recalls and safety warnings:
- Ethicon Physiomesh: Worldwide recall due to complications including recurrent hernias, mesh migration, infection, bleeding, and pain.
- Atrium C-Qur Mesh: Faced litigation due to complications like infections and allergic reactions caused by its Omega 3 fatty acid coating.
- C.R. Bard Products: Multiple models (3DMax, Kugel, Ventralex) associated with different complications leading to lawsuits.
- Covidien Products: Parietex and Parietene hernia mesh product lines implicated in litigation due to injuries.
- Gore DualMesh: Less commonly involved but has seen instances of infections related to their use.
Statute of Limitations for Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
The statute of limitations for hernia cases in Nevada is governed by Nevada state law:
- Nevada Statute of Limitations: 4-year window from the date the injury was discovered or should have been reasonably known.
- Discovery Rule: The countdown begins when you discovered or should have discovered the injury was caused by the mesh.
- Minor Exception: Individuals who were minors at the time of injury have until two years after their 18th birthday to initiate a lawsuit.
- Immediate Action Required: Timing is crucial to preserve your right to seek compensation in a hernia mesh lawsuit.
FAQs
1. What should I do if I experience complications from a hernia mesh implant?
Seek immediate medical attention to document your injuries. Afterward, consult with a lawyer experienced in hernia mesh litigation to explore your legal options and potential for compensation.
2. How can I determine if my hernia mesh patch was recalled?
You can check the FDA’s website for recall information or contact your healthcare provider. Recalls are issued when a product is found to be defective or poses significant health risks.
3. What legal claims are commonly made in hernia mesh lawsuits?
Common legal claims in hernia mesh lawsuits include defective product design, manufacturing defects, improper labeling, and failure to warn. Each claim requires specific evidence to prove that the mesh caused harm.
4. What is the typical settlement amount for Nevada hernia mesh lawsuits?
Settlement amounts vary significantly, but some experts suggest that they typically range from $65,000 to $80,000, with some cases reaching between $500,000 and $1 million. For example, C.R. Bard’s $184 million settlement averaged about $70,000 per claim.
5. Which manufacturers are most commonly involved in hernia mesh lawsuits?
The major manufacturers involved in hernia mesh lawsuits include Atrium Medical, C.R. Bard, Covidien, Ethicon, and W.L. Gore & Associates, all of which have been accused of producing mesh implants that caused serious complications.
6. How long does it take to resolve a hernia mesh lawsuit in Nevada?
The timeline for resolving a hernia mesh lawsuit varies, but with over 25,000 cases in multidistrict litigation, the process typically takes 1-3 years depending on the complexity of the case and settlement negotiations.
7. What is the role of multidistrict litigation in Nevada hernia mesh cases?
MDL consolidates similar cases to allow for efficient claim resolution. This streamlines litigation while ensuring that each plaintiff receives a fair chance to have their case heard.
8. Can I file a lawsuit if my hernia mesh surgery was successful initially?
Yes, if you later developed complications that required revision surgery or caused ongoing health issues, you may still be eligible to file a lawsuit.
9. What types of evidence are most important in hernia mesh lawsuits?
Key evidence in hernia mesh lawsuits includes medical records, imaging studies, expert testimony, and documentation linking your complications to the defective mesh.
10. Are there any exclusions for filing a hernia mesh lawsuit?
Generally, surgeries that occurred before January 1, 2006, or injuries that occurred within 30 days post-surgery are excluded from eligibility for legal action.
See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.
Get a Free Nevada Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers
If you’re considering filing a hernia mesh lawsuit in Nevada, it’s critical to enlist an attorney with expertise in the field.
A successful hernia mesh lawsuit requires demonstrating that you were harmed due to a defect in the hernia mesh and that the mesh was used as intended by the manufacturer when the injury occurred.
Our service offerings include:
- Free, confidential consultations with no obligation to proceed
- No upfront costs or fees to begin your case
- Payment only if we win your case through our contingency fee arrangement
- Experienced representation in multidistrict litigation
- Comprehensive case development including expert testimony and evidence gathering
At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we stand by your side during challenging times. Should you or someone close to you suffer from the repercussions of hernia mesh complications, don’t hesitate to connect with us.
Our adept team specializes in these cases and will navigate you through every step of the legal journey.
References
-
- https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/how-much-compensation-can-you-expect-for-a-hernia-mesh-lawsuit.html
- https://www.shouselaw.com/herniamesh/lawsuits/mdl/bard/
- https://feldmanpinto.com/ethicon-recalls-dangerous-ethicon-physiomesh-flexible-composite-hernia-mesh/
- https://www.drugwatch.com/hernia-mesh/lawsuits/