FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Alaska Hernia Mesh Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
If you or someone you know has experienced complications from hernia mesh, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is here to help. Recognized for our expertise in plaintiff representation, our primary goal is to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you’re entitled to.

Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review

Quick Summary

  • Facing complications from a hernia mesh implant can be distressing, and in Alaska, legal recourse may be available.
  • This guide examines the uptick in Alaska hernia mesh lawsuit cases, including claims against major manufacturers, and how those affected can proceed toward compensation for the pain and medical issues they’ve endured.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

In Alaska, the frequency of hernia mesh lawsuits is rising as plaintiffs allege severe post-surgical complications due to faulty hernia mesh implants. These lawsuits typically include claims of product liability and negligence against hernia mesh manufacturers, who are accused of failing to warn patients and healthcare providers about potential complications adequately.

Key manufacturers facing lawsuits in Alaska include Atrium Medical Corporation, Covidien, C.R. Bard, Ethicon, Gore Medical, and Genzyme Corporation.

The legal claims in hernia mesh lawsuits center on allegations of product liability and negligence, including the specific hernia mesh claim that manufacturers produced a defective product that was unreasonably dangerous when used as intended. They also allege that manufacturers failed to test the mesh or adequately disclose risks properly.

In many lawsuits, plaintiffs argue that design defects in hernia mesh implants result in complications requiring further surgeries. They emphasize that these designs were unsafe and inadequately tested before release.

Furthermore, they claim that manufacturing defects led to dangerous deviations from the original design or intended materials, and improper labeling failed to warn of the risks associated with the defective hernia mesh implant.

The Role of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Alaska Cases

Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) is a legal procedure designed to streamline the process of handling complex cases involving multiple plaintiffs and similar claims. This procedure consolidates similar cases, allowing them to proceed together through key pretrial processes, including discovery and motions.

Alaska hernia mesh cases may be incorporated into national MDL proceedings, particularly if they share common factual and legal issues with cases from other jurisdictions.

Bellwether trials in MDL proceedings help gauge potential settlement amounts and are likely to influence the litigation strategy and potential outcomes for Alaska hernia mesh lawsuits within the MDL.

The outcomes of bellwether trials in MDLs, including the $500,000 and $4.8 million verdicts, serve as indicators for the value of individual cases and may affect the decisions of plaintiffs in Alaska to settle or proceed to trial.

Latest Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates

The arena of hernia mesh lawsuits is continuously changing as new cases emerge and current lawsuits arrive at settlements or verdicts.

This ongoing legal action not only holds manufacturers accountable for their actions but also provides a ray of hope for those still suffering from the effects of defective hernia mesh implants. The outcomes of these lawsuits can significantly impact future cases, particularly for plaintiffs in Alaska.

What Is Hernia Mesh?

According to the DrugWatch, hernia mesh is a medical device used in hernia repair surgeries. Its purpose is to provide additional support to weakened or damaged tissue [1]. Most often, it’s made from synthetic materials or animal tissue and can come in different shapes and sizes to accommodate various types of hernias.

Even though hernia mesh implants have proved advantageous in numerous cases, problems surface when the implants are defective. Some common problems associated with defective hernia mesh implants include:

Suppose you have experienced any complications or side effects from a hernia mesh implant. In that case, it is important to seek medical attention, possibly including hernia repair surgery, and consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.

These defective hernia mesh implants, also known as hernia surgery mesh, have been linked to a host of post-surgical complications, leading to significant discomfort and additional medical procedures for patients.

Why Are People Filing Hernia Mesh Lawsuits?

People are filing hernia mesh lawsuits due to the severe complications they have suffered from malfunctioning implants. These complications can drastically alter their quality of life, leading to:

  • Chronic pain
  • Recurrent hernias
  • Bowel obstructions
  • Organ perforations

Major hernia mesh manufacturers like Bard, Ethicon, and Atrium are facing lawsuits in Alaska. In these lawsuits, specific products such as Atrium C-QUR mesh, Ethicon Physiomesh, and Bard hernia mesh are explicitly cited due to complications like surgical mesh-related infections.

Other manufacturers potentially implicated in Alaska hernia mesh lawsuits include B. Braun Melsungen, LifeCell Corporation, and Medtronic.

Complications Named in the Lawsuit

In hernia mesh lawsuits, plaintiffs have reported a range of complications, including:

  • Adhesion (where the mesh implant sticks to other organs and tissue)
  • Bowel obstruction
  • Chronic pain
  • Hernia recurrence years after the original surgery

Some complications emerge within days after surgery, while others may have a substantial delay between the surgery and the onset of symptoms related to the mesh defects.

Common Injuries Associated with Defective Hernia Mesh in Alaska

According to the National Institute of Health 2022 study, in Alaska, victims of defective hernia mesh implants have reported various specific injuries. Reported injuries encompass infection, mesh rejection and migration, organ and bowel perforation, and hernia recurrence [2].

Symptoms of hernia mesh infection can include fever, inflammation, redness, a burning sensation at the site, abdominal pain, and flu-like symptoms. Left untreated, these infections can lead to severe complications such as sepsis and possibly death.

Large jury verdicts in hernia mesh lawsuits, such as the $4.8 million verdict in Rhode Island, influence the outcomes and strategies in Alaska cases.

The presence of these injuries and complications has raised awareness in Alaska about the adverse effects of hernia mesh implants, resulting in several lawsuits that cite issues such as:

  • mesh adhesion
  • erosion
  • infection
  • pain
  • the need for additional surgeries.

Who Qualifies To File a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?

People who experienced significant pain, infection, or other injuries or illnesses post a hernia mesh repair or surgery requiring hernia mesh qualify to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.

Eligibility for a hernia mesh lawsuit requires the following details:

  • The hospital’s name where the surgery took place
  • The doctor’s name
  • The medical condition suffered
  • Dates of surgery and noticing complications
  • The manufacturer and brand of the hernia mesh device

As of February 2024, over 25,000 hernia mesh lawsuits remain pending across multiple MDLs. Varying compensation estimates range from around $60,000 to $1 million based on individual case specifics. Jayne Conroy, Esquire

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Alaska

Several factors are considered in determining settlement amounts in Alaska hernia mesh lawsuits. The factors include:

  • The severity of the plaintiff’s injuries
  • The extent of the medical treatments required
  • Costs of medical care
  • Lost wages
  • Reduced earning capacity
  • Non-economic damages like pain and suffering and the impact on the quality of life.

Settlement amounts are also affected by the presence of evidence confirming the defendant’s liability or negligence and the overall strength of the plaintiff’s legal case. This highlights the importance of having a robust legal strategy and compelling evidence to support your claim.

Potential Compensation for Victims of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits in Alaska

Victims of hernia mesh complications in Alaska may be entitled to financial compensation for injuries caused by defective medical devices.

Compensation claims can be filed for various adverse effects reported following hernia mesh surgeries, including:

  • Infections
  • Adhesions
  • Neurological changes
  • Abdominal pain

Compensation can also be pursued for the following symptoms of hernia mesh failure:

  • Severe pain
  • Digestive issues
  • Fevers
  • Sweating
  • Unusual headaches
  • Nausea
  • Unexplained dental problems

Manufacturers of hernia mesh products that have been recalled may be held liable for injuries caused by their defective devices.

Filing an Alaska Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

If you’re considering filing a hernia mesh lawsuit in Alaska, it’s crucial to ensure you adhere to the statute of limitations and to consult with a hernia mesh attorney.

The process can be complex and requires a thorough understanding of the legal landscape surrounding hernia mesh complications.

Types of Evidence To Present

The evidence you present in a hernia mesh lawsuit can profoundly influence your case outcome. This evidence typically includes:

  • Medical records that document your complications and treatments
  • Expert testimony that supports your claims
  • Any evidence of the manufacturer’s negligence or defect in the product

It’s crucial to gather this evidence meticulously and present it effectively to strengthen your case.

Alaska Statute of Limitations

Under the Alaska statute of limitations, you’re required to file a hernia mesh lawsuit within two years from the injury date or the date harm was discovered.

The “discovery rule” allows the statute of limitations to start when the victim discovers the injury, not when the injury occurred. Failing to file within this timeframe can lead to victims being barred from recovering any compensation.

Therefore, it’s advisable to consult with hernia mesh attorneys as soon as possible after discovering your hernia mesh injury.

Related Articles:

See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered severe pain or injury from a defective medical device?

Get Your Free Consultation From Alaska Hernia Mesh Lawyers

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is here to support you during tough times. If you or a loved one has suffered injuries from hernia mesh complications, reach out to us. Our team is experienced in handling these cases and will guide you through the legal process. 

We’ll help you understand your rights and determine if you’re eligible for a hernia mesh lawsuit. Consultations are free, and there are no fees unless we win your case. Contact us for a comprehensive case evaluation on hernia mesh issues.

Reference:

  1. https://www.drugwatch.com/hernia-mesh/
  2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767664/

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.