Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit Overview

The Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter lawsuit involves claims against Cook Medical regarding their defective IVC filter device. The primary allegations focus on the manufacturer’s failure to adequately warn patients and physicians about the serious risks of device fracture, migration, and perforation when filters remain implanted longer than intended. These lawsuits stem from the device’s tendency to splinter when left in place beyond the recommended timeframe, as IVC filters were originally designed for temporary use only. The FDA has recognized these significant risks and now encourages immediate follow-up and filter removal once the risk of pulmonary embolism has passed.

Latest Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit Updates

As litigation continues to develop in this area, patients who have experienced complications from Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava filters are increasingly seeking legal remedies for their injuries.

• July 2025 – As of this date, nearly 8,000 lawsuits remain active against Cook Medical, the manufacturer of the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest and other IVC filters, in federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Indiana. Plaintiffs allege that Cook’s IVC filters, including the Bird’s Nest, were prone to fracture, migration, and perforation, causing serious injuries. Cook has faced mixed results in court, including appellate reversals and jury verdicts for plaintiffs [1].
• 2020 – A published case report describes a patient with a permanent Bird’s Nest IVC filter who suffered a symptomatic duodenal perforation. This highlights the potential for serious, late-onset gastrointestinal complications associated with this filter design [2].
• 2012 – A review in the American Journal of Roentgenology notes that, since a 1986 design modification to address migration, only about five cases of Bird’s Nest filter migration have been reported. Nonetheless, complications such as insertion site thrombosis, filter migration, strut erosion, recurrent pulmonary embolism, IVC obstruction, venous insufficiency, and strut fracture have been documented [3].
• 2009 – A comprehensive evidence-based evaluation found that the Bird’s Nest filter had a wire prolapse rate of up to 70% and IVC strut perforation rates as high as 85%. These rates are among the highest reported for any IVC filter, raising significant concerns about device safety [4].
• June 29, 1996 – A follow-up study of 40 patients with Bird’s Nest filter placement found that all surviving patients showed perforation of the vena cava wall by filter struts, though these were not clinically symptomatic. No filter migration or IVC occlusion was observed, and the filter was effective in preventing recurrent pulmonary embolism. Nonocclusive intrafilter thrombus was detected in 25% of patients who underwent imaging [5].
• 1986 – The Bird’s Nest filter underwent a significant design modification due to previously reported cases of filter migration. The original flexible struts were replaced with stiffer wires to improve anchoring and reduce migration risk. This change resulted in a dramatic decrease in reported migration incidents, though other complications persisted [3].
• 1982 – The Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter, manufactured by Cook Medical, was approved by the FDA. The device was designed to overcome disadvantages of Cook’s earlier Greenfield IVC filter and consists of 2 rigid, V-shaped struts with four 25-cm-long stainless steel wires attached between them [6].

FDA Reports and Statistics

The FDA has acknowledged the serious risks associated with IVC filters, particularly when they remain implanted longer than necessary. The agency has issued safety communications encouraging physicians to consider filter removal when the risk of pulmonary embolism has decreased. Reports indicate that prolonged implantation significantly increases the likelihood of device fracture, migration, and other life-threatening complications. The FDA’s recognition of these risks has led to increased scrutiny of all IVC filter devices, including the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest model.

Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Injuries & Side Effects

Patients who have received the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter have reported a wide range of serious complications and injuries. The most concerning issues arise when the device remains implanted beyond its intended temporary use period, leading to increased risk of fracture and migration.

Common injuries and side effects include:

• IVC Filter Fracture: Device breakage causing fragments to travel through the body
• IVC Perforation, Puncture or Serious Damage to the Heart, Lungs or Vena Cava: Structural damage to critical organs
• Internal Bleeding: Potentially life-threatening hemorrhaging
• Blood Clots: Formation of dangerous clots despite the filter’s intended purpose
• Deep Venous Thrombosis: Blood clots in deep veins, typically in legs
• Cardiac or Pericardial Tamponade: Fluid accumulation around the heart
• Ventricle Tachycardia: Abnormal heart rhythm
• Lower Limb DVT: Deep vein thrombosis in the legs
• Hematoma or Nerve Injury at the Puncture Site: Complications at insertion location
• Constant and Severe Pain in the Heart, Chest or Elsewhere in the Body: Chronic pain conditions
• Pulmonary Embolism: Blood clots in the lungs
• Infection: Bacterial contamination and sepsis
• Death: Fatal complications from device failure

Do You Qualify for a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter lawsuit if:

• You received a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest IVC filter implant
• You experienced serious side effects including filter fracture, migration, perforation, internal bleeding, or other complications
• The injuries required medical treatment or hospitalization
• You can provide medical documentation linking your injuries to the IVC filter
• You suffered from wrongful death of a loved one due to IVC filter complications

Evidence Required for a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuit

To support your claim, you will need:

• Medical Records: Complete documentation of your filter implantation, complications, and treatment
• Expert Testimony: Medical professionals who can establish the connection between your injuries and the device
• Documentation of Complications: Evidence of filter fracture, migration, or other device-related injuries
• Proof of Implantation: Records confirming you received the specific Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest model

Damages You Can Recover

In a successful Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter lawsuit, you may recover:

• Medical Expenses: Past and future medical costs related to your injuries
• Lost Wages: Compensation for time away from work due to complications
• Pain and Suffering: Damages for physical and emotional distress
• Punitive Damages: Additional compensation to punish the manufacturer for negligence

IVC Filter Wrongful Death Claims

Many patients implanted with IVC filters face life-threatening complications, including device migration to the heart which has resulted in patient deaths. The FDA recognizes these fatal risks and encourages immediate follow-up and filter removal after the risk of pulmonary embolism has passed. Unfortunately, removal surgery may also involve significant risks. If you’ve experienced the wrongful death of a loved one resulting from a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest IVC filter, it’s important you understand your legal options for seeking justice and compensation.

Statute of Limitations for Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter Lawsuits

The time limit to file a lawsuit varies by state, typically ranging from 1 to 3 years after discovering the injury. It’s crucial to act quickly as these deadlines are strictly enforced by the courts. Consulting with an experienced attorney as soon as possible ensures you don’t miss critical filing deadlines that could prevent you from seeking compensation.

FAQs

1. What evidence is required to support a claim in the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava filter lawsuit?

Medical records, expert testimony, and documentation of complications or injuries related to the filter are crucial evidence needed to support a claim in the lawsuit.

2. What damages can be recovered in a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava filter lawsuit?

Recoverable damages may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and potentially punitive damages, depending on the severity of the harm caused by the filter.

3. How long do I have to file a lawsuit regarding the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava filter?

The time limit to file a lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state, typically ranging from 1 to 3 years after discovering the injury.

4. What is the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter?

The Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter is a medical device manufactured by Cook Medical, approved by the FDA in 1989, designed for percutaneous introduction through jugular, subclavian and femoral approaches.

5. Why are IVC filters causing problems?

IVC filters were designed for temporary use only, but because they’re often implanted in emergency situations, patients may not receive proper follow-up care, leading to prolonged implantation and increased risk of device fracture and migration.

6. Can family members file wrongful death claims?

Yes, family members can pursue wrongful death claims if their loved one died due to complications from the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest IVC filter, including cases where the device migrated to the heart.

7. What makes the Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest filter different from other IVC filters?

The device consists of 2 rigid, V-shaped struts with four 25-cm-long, 0.18-mm diameter stainless steel wires, and was specifically designed to overcome disadvantages of Cook’s earlier Greenfield IVC filter.

8. Are there other Cook Medical IVC filter lawsuits?

Yes, there are ongoing lawsuits involving other Cook Medical IVC filters, including the Cook Gunther Tulip IVC Filter and Cook Celect IVC Filter litigation.

9. What should I do if I have an IVC filter but haven’t experienced complications?

Even if you haven’t experienced complications, you should consult with medical professionals about proper monitoring and potential removal, and consider speaking with legal counsel about your options.

10. How do I know if my complications are related to the IVC filter?

Medical evaluation and expert testimony are typically required to establish the connection between your symptoms and the IVC filter, which is why comprehensive medical records are crucial for your case.

Related Article: IVC Filter Lawsuits & Settlements

See the other defective medical device suits we’ve taken on.

Get A Free Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest IVC Filter Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

Time is limited to pursue legal action for Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter complications. With statutes of limitations typically ranging from only 1 to 3 years from the date of injury discovery, it’s crucial to act quickly to protect your rights.

The Medical Device Litigation Group at our law firm offers:

• Free, confidential consultations to evaluate your case
• No upfront costs or fees – you pay nothing unless we win
• Experienced representation in IVC filter litigation nationwide
• Individual attention for your specific case circumstances

We are currently accepting new IVC filter complications cases in all 50 states and handling individual litigation nationwide. Whether you’ve been injured or not, if you have received a Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest IVC filter implant, we would like to speak with you.

References:

1. https://www.drugwatch.com/ivc-filters/lawsuits/
2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7921187/
3. https://ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1831037
4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4862854/
5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8640416/
6. https://www.whichmedicaldevice.com/editorial/article/104/a-brief-history-of-inferior-vena-cava-filters-and-analysis-of-current-devices