When Police Can Seize Your Cell Phone: Understanding the Fourth Amendment

According to CL, the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits law enforcement from seizing a person’s cell phone without a judicial warrant, which must be granted based on probable cause that the phone contains essential evidence [1].

The Amendment states:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized

However, if police have probable cause to believe that a cell phone contains evidence of a crime, they may temporarily seize the phone without a warrant until one can be obtained. According to United States v. Place (1983):

Where law enforcement authorities have probable cause to believe that a container holds contraband or evidence of a crime, but have not secured a warrant, the Court has interpreted the [Fourth] Amendment to permit seizure of the property, pending issuance of a warrant to examine its contents, if the exigencies of the circumstances demand it or some other recognized exception to the warrant requirement is present

Seizing a cell phone prevents the owner from accessing it, but searching its contents requires a warrant due to privacy concerns. The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled in The State of Ohio v. Smith (2009):

Once the cell phone is in police custody, the state has satisfied its immediate interest in collecting and preserving evidence and can take preventive steps to ensure that the data found on the phone are neither lost nor erased. But because a person has a high expectation of privacy in a cell phone’s contents, police must then obtain a warrant before intruding into the phone’s contents

If a cell phone is seized without a warrant, defense attorneys should consider filing a motion to suppress any information obtained from the search, challenging the legality of both the seizure and the supporting affidavit for the search warrant. The court will then hold a hearing to determine if the initial seizure and subsequent search were justified.

What is the 4th Amendment Cell Phone Case?

Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), is a pivotal Supreme Court case that determined warrantless searches and seizures of cell phone digital contents during an arrest violate the Fourth Amendment [2].

The case arose from inconsistent rulings on cell phone searches from various state and federal courts. The Fourth, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits had ruled that police officers can search cell phones incident to arrest under various standards.

Conversely, the First Circuit and the Supreme Courts of Florida and Ohio required police to obtain a warrant to search a suspect’s phone. California had even proposed legislation mandating warrants for searching “portable electronic devices.”

Riley v. California is celebrated as a significant victory for privacy rights, with legal experts referring to it as “the privacy gift that keeps on giving.”

Do Police Have the Right to Tap My Cell Phone?

According to Find Law, law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI, have the capability to listen to private phone calls by requesting to wiretap your phone line. Wiretapping involves secretly connecting to a telephone line to monitor conversations [3].

Law enforcement agencies can tap your phone under specific circumstances. You probably will not know if law enforcement begins to target you for an investigation. Understanding your rights and law enforcement’s tools to tap your phone can help you protect your privacy.

While actions in public view are accessible to law enforcement, such as observing through an open window, tapping private communications like phone calls requires a wiretap order, similar to a search warrant.

Given its intrusive nature, obtaining a wiretap order requires law enforcement to demonstrate probable cause that the tap will uncover serious criminal activity, such as drug trafficking or money laundering. Investigating misdemeanors does not meet these stringent requirements.

Wiretapping is regulated by state and federal laws, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, which imposes restrictions on the use of wiretaps. For instance, agencies cannot listen to privileged conversations and must minimize eavesdropping on irrelevant discussions.

It’s important to note that phone conversations from prison are typically exempt from wiretap order requirements due to the reduced expectation of privacy for inmates.

Just as understanding wellness techniques can enhance personal well-being, knowing your rights regarding wiretapping can help you maintain your privacy and security.

Can Police Force You to Unlock Your Phone?

The legality of police requiring you to unlock your phone, known as “compelled decryption,” varies by state.

According to several state court rulings, you have the right to refuse a police officer’s request to unlock your phone and the authorities cannot force you to do so. In these states, the authorities often need a court warrant to force you to unlock your smartphone. Some states allow you to decline an unlock request for your phone, including Florida, California, and Virginia.

Conversely, other states, including New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Vermont, have ruled that police can legally order you to unlock your device. This legal debate centers around the Fifth Amendment, which protects against self-incrimination. While some courts uphold the right to refuse under the Fifth Amendment, others do not.

Until the U.S. Supreme Court provides a definitive ruling, states will continue to enforce their own laws on the matter.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant?

Generally, police need a search warrant to legally inspect your phone, including accessing text messages and personal data. A judge grants a search warrant if the police establish probable cause that the phone contains evidence of criminal activity. This requirement is based on the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

What Should You Do If Police Ask You to Unlock Your Phone?

Refuse and request an attorney. Only provide your name and invoke your right to remain silent. Contact a criminal defense attorney immediately, even if you are innocent, to ensure your rights are protected.

Related Articles:

If you’re accused of a crime, don’t hesitate to contact us for your free consultation with one of our experienced personal injury lawyers.

Get a Free Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

The Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focuses on the representation of plaintiffs in lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and are currently accepting new legal challenges in all 50 states.

If you or a loved one was involved with these matters, you should contact our law firm immediately for a free case evaluation. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

References:
1. https://www.koffellaw.com/blog/search-and-seizure-of-cell-phones-by-law-enforce/
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riley_v._California
3. https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-rights/do-the-police-have-the-right-to-tap-my-telephone.html

When Can Police Seize Your Cell Phone? Know Your Rights