Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

A Missouri woman is suing L’Oreal and other cosmetic companies alleging that her uterine cancer was caused by long-term use of hair relaxer products such as Ultra Precise No-Lye Conditioning Relaxer. The lawsuit was filed on the heels of a study which found that women who used hair relaxers and hair straighteners regularly faced an increased risk of uterine cancer compared to women who did not use the products.
Award Logos
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Free Confidential Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Consultation
If you or a loved one think you may have a claim, you should contact a personal injury lawyer immediately.

You may be entitled to recover compensation and our legal team can help. Please click the button below for a Free Consultation or call us toll-free 24 hrs/day for legal advice by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Case Evaluation

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with uterine cancer, breast cancer, endometriosis, or uterine fibroids following the use of Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer, you may be entitled to pursue compensation.

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP, we are dedicated to helping individuals who have suffered due to dangerous hair relaxer products. Our experienced legal team is here to guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Contact Schmidt & Clark, LLP today for a free, no-obligation consultation.

Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Overview

Hair relaxer lawsuits allege that the chemical products cause serious health issues, including uterine cancer [1]. 

The primary allegations against L’Oréal, SoftSheen-Carson Professional, and other manufacturers claimed that these companies knew that their products contained toxic chemicals linked to cancer and endocrine disorders. A study by the National Institutes of Health links hair relaxer use to increased uterine cancer risk.

Latest Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Updates

  • 2022 – A case was filed in a federal court in Chicago by a Missouri woman alleging her uterine cancer was caused by long-term use of hair relaxers [2]. 

FDA Reports and Statistics

The FDA has been monitoring chemical hair relaxers due to growing concerns about their safety. While the FDA does not specifically track Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer products separately in its database, the agency has compiled data on chemical hair straightening and relaxing products as a category.

Market Statistics

  • The global hair relaxer market was valued at approximately $718 million in 2023 and is projected to reach $854 million by 2028 [3].
  • An estimated 50-70% of Black women in the United States report using hair relaxers at some point in their lives, with many beginning use during childhood.
  • According to industry reports, approximately 2.5 million hair relaxer units are sold annually in the United States alone.

FDA Adverse Event Reports

The FDA’s MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database and adverse event reporting system for cosmetics has documented numerous incidents related to chemical hair relaxers:

  • Between 2018-2023, the FDA received over 1,200 adverse event reports related to chemical hair straighteners and relaxers.
  • Approximately 68% of these reports involved scalp irritation, chemical burns, and hair loss.
  • Serious adverse events, including hospitalization, were reported in approximately 5% of cases.

NIH Study Findings

A landmark study from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 2022 found:

  • Women who used hair straightening products more than four times per year were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer compared to those who didn’t use these products [4].
  • The study followed 33,497 women aged 35-74 for nearly 11 years.
  • Of the 378 uterine cancer cases diagnosed, those who reported frequent use of hair straightening products had a 4.05% risk of developing uterine cancer by age 70, compared to 1.64% for those who never used the products.
  • Black women may be at higher risk due to higher prevalence of use (approximately 60% of participants who reported using straighteners were Black women).

Health Impact Statistics

  • Uterine cancer rates have been rising in the United States, particularly among Black women, with approximately 65,950 new cases diagnosed in 2022.
  • Studies have detected endocrine-disrupting chemicals in many hair relaxer products, including phthalates, parabens, and formaldehyde, which have been linked to hormone-sensitive cancers.
  • Research suggests that these chemicals may be absorbed through the scalp, particularly when there are burns, lesions, or other damage present during application.

These statistics underscore the potential significant health risks associated with chemical hair relaxer use and support the basis for ongoing litigation against manufacturers.

Hair Relaxer Injuries & Side Effects

Hair relaxers have been linked to serious health conditions in users, particularly women who use the product regularly:

  • Uterine Cancer: Long-term use associated with increased risk
  • Breast Cancer: Listed as a potential health risk
  • Endometriosis: Reported as a possible side effect
  • Uterine Fibroids: Connected to hair relaxer use
  • Chemical Burns: Can occur during application
  • Scalp Lesions: Possible skin reactions from chemical exposure

Related Article: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Update

Do You Qualify for an Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit?

You may qualify for an Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer lawsuit if you were diagnosed with uterine cancer, breast cancer, endometriosis, or uterine fibroids after using Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer products.

Damages You Can Recover

Compensation can include:

  • Medical expenses
  • Pain and suffering
  • Lost wages
  • Other related costs
  • Punitive damages in severe cases of manufacturer negligence

Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Recall Information

As of April 2025, there has been no official FDA recall of Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer products. However, following scientific studies linking hair relaxers to increased cancer risk, regulatory scrutiny of these products has intensified.

FDA Safety Communications

  • October 2023 – The FDA issued a safety communication regarding chemical hair straighteners and relaxers, warning consumers about potential cancer risks but stopping short of a formal recall.
  • January 2024 – FDA announced increased monitoring of hair relaxer products and requested manufacturers to provide additional safety data on chemical ingredients.
    Consumer Safety Recommendations

While no official recall has been issued, health authorities have recommended that consumers:

  • Reduce frequency of hair relaxer treatments
  • Consider alternative hair styling products that do not contain potentially harmful chemicals
  • Check product ingredients for phthalates, formaldehyde, and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals
  • Report adverse reactions to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information program
  • We continue to monitor for any official recalls or safety alerts related to Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer products and will update this information as developments occur.

Statute of Limitations for Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

The statute of limitations for filing an Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer lawsuit varies by state and depends on when you were diagnosed with a related health condition.

Most states apply the “discovery rule,” meaning the time limit begins when you discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) that your injury was connected to hair relaxer use.

Timeframes by State

Here are the statutes of limitations for product liability claims in several key states:

State Statute of Limitations Discovery Rule
California 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
New York 3 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – limited application
Texas 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
Florida 4 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
Illinois 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
Georgia 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
Pennsylvania 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection
Ohio 2 years from injury/diagnosis Yes – time begins when you discover or should have discovered the connection

Special Considerations

  • Latent Injuries: For conditions like cancer that may take years to develop, the statute of limitations typically begins when you are diagnosed, not when you used the product.
  • Ongoing MDL Litigation: As hair relaxer lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL), specific timelines may be established by the court.
  • Minor Plaintiffs: If the injured party was a minor when using the product, the statute of limitations may be extended until they reach the age of majority.

Important: These timeframes are general guidelines. The specific circumstances of your case may affect the applicable statute of limitations. Consult with an attorney promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the legal time limits for your state.

Related Articles:

FAQs

1. What is Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer?

Ultra Precise No-Lye Conditioning Relaxer is a professional relaxer that conditions hair during the relaxing process. The built-in conditioner is designed to condition each hair fiber and smooth damaged areas selectively, fly-away fibers, and split ends. Ultra Precise No-Lye Conditioning Relaxer is manufactured and marketed by SoftSheen-Carson Professional.

2. How can consumers determine if they have a defective Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer product?

Consumers can determine if they have a defective Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer product by checking for recall notices issued by the manufacturer or regulatory agencies, which typically include product names, batch numbers, and other identifying information.

3. What steps should I take if I am injured by Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer?

If you are injured by Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer, seek immediate medical attention, document the incident and your injuries, retain any remaining product and receipts, and consult a lawyer to discuss potential legal action and compensation.

4. Can I join a class action lawsuit if I was affected by Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer?

Yes, individuals affected by Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer may join a class action lawsuit if one is available. Class action lawsuits allow multiple plaintiffs to combine their cases, providing a stronger collective legal action against the manufacturer.

5. Is there a non-chemical hair relaxer alternative?

Unfortunately, no. There is no product completely free of chemicals that will permanently straighten highly textured hair. Baking soda can help relax hair naturally but will not completely straighten it. It makes curls looser and softer and helps clarify the hair by removing impurities, which can make hair sleeker and shinier.

6. What can I use in place of a hair relaxer?

Keratin treatments are a good alternative to relaxers, as they introduce keratin protein into the hair and seal the cuticle, making the hair stronger and shinier. These treatments last for 6 months or longer and work best on dry and damaged hair caused by straightening or relaxing.

7. How can I lower my risk for cancer related to hair relaxers?

Women should limit or avoid the use of hair relaxers and hair straighteners to reduce their risk of cancer, based on the studies conducted so far.

Get a Free Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Evaluation From Our Lawyers

Time is limited to pursue legal action for injuries related to Ultra Precise Hair Relaxer.

The Products Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, LLP offers:

  • Free, confidential consultations
  • No upfront costs or fees
  • Payment only if we win your case

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been unreasonably injured by a dangerous or defective consumer product?

References

  1. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/114/12/1636/6759686
  2. https://www.schmidtandclark.com/wp-content/uploads/DEHP-Complaint-J.-Mitchell-Illinois-FINAL-00848754xE6B76-1.docx
  3. https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/beauty-personal-care/worldwide?currency=USD
  4. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/114/12/1636/6759686

Get a Free Case Review

You may be entitled to financial compensation.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Secure Submission