FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

What Is The Tort of Conversion?
Types, Elements & Defenses

Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.


If someone used your personal property without your permission and caused you damage, you can sue them for conversion.

As a personal injury attorney, I have a decade-long experience handling conversion cases, and in this article, I will explain what the tort of conversion entails.

Quick Summary

  • In some cases, the plaintiff may sue multiple people or businesses for conversion.
  • If the defendant took the plaintiff's property without their permission, they would be interfering with the plaintiff's right to that property.
  • Conversion can happen in a variety of ways, depending on the type of property involved.

What is Conversion?

A lawyer looking at a book while talking on the phoneConversion is the wrongful taking or using of another person's property without the rightful owner's consent or lawful justification [1].

Conversion is not just taking property but the act of depriving the rightful owner of it or unreasonably withholding possession from them. 

That's what makes it a civil wrong.

Conversion is a type of intentional tort in civil law, and its equivalent in criminal law includes interference with personal property, including trespass and theft.

3 Types of Conversion

There are several types of conversion other than civil and criminal conversion, and they are:

1. Intellectual Property Rights Conversion

IPR conversion occurs when someone uses copyrighted material without permission.

In a notable case, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Dimension Films, the court ruled that even a small sample of a sound recording could constitute copyright infringement.

The defendants had used a two-second sample from a Funkadelic song without permission. The court awarded $88,980 in damages to Bridgeport Music.

2. Wrongful Conversion

Wrongful conversion happens when borrowed items aren't returned on demand.

In the case of Popov v. Hayashi, a dispute arose over the ownership of Barry Bonds' 73rd home run ball.

The court ruled that both parties had an equal claim to the ball and ordered it to be sold, with the proceeds split equally. The ball ultimately sold for $450,000.

3. Real Property Conversion

Real property conversion involves unauthorized use or possession of land or buildings. In the case of Wanger v. Zeh, a neighbor built a fence that encroached on the plaintiff's property.

The court ordered the removal of the fence and awarded damages for trespass. The settlement included $10,000 in compensatory damages and $5,000 in punitive damages.

What Is A Conversion Claim?

A lawyer looking at a bok

A conversion claim is a civil lawsuit that is filed when someone unlawfully uses or takes another person's property without their permission. 

Based on my experience, most conversion claims are often filed in situations where the plaintiff has loaned or rented property to the defendant, and the defendant refuses to return the property after it has been requested. 

"Conversion is a tort involving strict liability where even an innocent third party recipient of stolen goods may commit the tort of conversion."
- Trevor Todd, Estate Litigation Lawyer

How Can Conversion Be Committed?

Conversion can be committed by selling someone else's property without their permission, acquiring a property through an unauthorized sale with the intent to secure a proprietary interest in it for oneself, or refusing to return someone else's property after it has been requested.

As you can see, there are many ways to commit conversion. 

For example, another form of conversion is if someone takes your car without your permission and uses it as their own vehicle.

4 Elements in a Tort of Conversion Claim

Close up shot of a lawyer writing down notes

Four elements must be present to establish conversion:

1. Plaintiff's Right to Property

The plaintiff must have an immediate or legal right to the specific property. This element establishes the plaintiff's legal standing to bring the claim.

  • Burden of Proof: The plaintiff must demonstrate ownership or right to possession at the time of conversion.
  • Evidence: Title documents, purchase receipts, or proof of rightful possession.
  • Challenges: Disputes over ownership or possession rights, especially in shared or borrowed property cases.
  • Court Interpretation: Courts typically require clear evidence of the plaintiff's superior right to the property, though absolute ownership is not always necessary.

2. Defendant's Wrongful Act

The defendant's conversion by the wrongful act is inconsistent with the property rights of the rightful owner.  This element focuses on the defendant's actions interfering with the plaintiff's property rights.

  • Burden of Proof: The plaintiff must show the defendant's act was unauthorized and incompatible with the plaintiff's rights.
  • Evidence: Witness testimony, surveillance footage, or unauthorized use or sale documentation.
  • Challenges: Determining what constitutes "inconsistent" use, especially in cases of minor interference.
  • Court Interpretation: Courts consider whether the defendant's actions significantly impaired the plaintiff's rights to use or possess the property.

3. Legal Causation

The defendant's actions were the legal cause of the plaintiff's loss or damage. This element directly links the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's loss.

  • Burden of Proof: The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's actions directly resulted in their loss or damage.
  • Evidence: Financial records showing losses, expert testimony on property value, or documentation of repair costs.
  • Challenges: Proving the extent of damages, especially for intangible losses.
  • Court Interpretation: Courts typically require a clear causal connection between the defendant's act and the plaintiff's loss.

4. Intentional Interference

The defendants intentionally interfered in the plaintiff's lawful possession, causing damage. This element focuses on the defendant's state of mind and the intentional nature of the act.

  • Burden of Proof: The plaintiff must show the defendant acted intentionally, though not necessarily with malicious intent.
  • Evidence: Communications indicating intent, pattern of behavior, or admissions by the defendant.
  • Challenges: Proving intent, especially in cases where the defendant claims mistake or ignorance.
  • Court Interpretation: Courts generally do not require proof of bad faith or knowledge of wrongdoing, focusing instead on the intentional nature of the act itself.

In a conversion claim, the plaintiff must prove all these elements, with particular emphasis on demonstrating the defendant's intentional interference with their property rights.

The court will evaluate each element based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, considering the nature of the property, the extent of interference, and the resulting damages.

What Are the Defenses In a Tort of Conversion?

Close up shot of a businessman doing paperwork

In a conversion case, the defendant can raise several defenses to argue that their actions were justified or excusable. Let's look at three common defenses: Necessity, Abatement, and Consent.

1. Necessity Defense

The necessity defense can be used when the defendant's actions were necessary to prevent greater harm. This defense is typically invoked when obtaining prior permission would have been impractical or impossible, and the defendant’s actions were crucial in an emergency.

Examples of Successful Necessity Defense
  • During extreme heat, rescue a child or pet by breaking into a locked car.
  • Destroying property to prevent the spread of fire, such as breaking down a fence to control an uncontrolled blaze.
Required Evidence
  • Proof of imminent peril or danger that justified the action.
  • No reasonable legal alternative was available to address the situation.
  • Proportionality: The harm inflicted must have been less than the harm avoided.
Common Pitfalls
  • Failure to prove urgency: The defense will likely fail if the defendant cannot show that the action was truly unavoidable.
  • Excessive force: Acting beyond what was necessary to handle the emergency can undermine this defense.
Procedural Requirements
  • The defendant bears the evidentiary burden of raising the necessity.
  • Once raised, the prosecution must disprove the necessity beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. Abatement Defense

The abatement defense allows individuals to take action to remove interference with their property, particularly when a neighbor’s actions are impacting their land or rights. This defense is rooted in stopping the nuisance or harm immediately.

Examples of Successful Abatement Defense
  • Cutting overhanging branches from a neighbor's tree that extends onto your property.
  • Blocking water runoff that is damaging your land or home.
Required Evidence
  • Proof of actual interference with the defendant’s property rights.
  • Documentation that the defendant notified the other party before taking action.
  • This demonstrated that the abatement action was reasonable and appropriate in addressing the interference.
Common Pitfalls
  • Taking excessive action beyond what was necessary to address the problem
  • Failing to provide adequate notice before taking action

3. Consent Defense

The consent defense arises when the defendant can show that the plaintiff permitted the act of conversion. If the plaintiff agreed to or allowed the defendant to take or use the property, the defendant is not liable for conversion.

Examples of Successful Consent Defense
  • Borrowing a friend's car with their permission.
  • Using someone’s equipment or property based on prior consent.
Required Evidence
  • Proof of explicit or implied consent from the plaintiff.
  • Documentation (written or verbal) showing that the defendant had permission to use the property.
Common Pitfalls
  • Exceeding the scope of the granted permission
  • Relying on implied consent without clear evidence
Time Limitations

While specific time limits vary by jurisdiction, generally:

  • The defense must be raised during pre-trial proceedings or at trial
  • Failure to assert the defense promptly may result in a waiver

These defenses can effectively shield a defendant from liability in a conversion case if the necessary evidence is provided. However, the burden of proof rests heavily on the defendant, and failure to substantiate the defense can result in unfavorable outcomes.

What Are Conversion Remedies?

A person signing a contract

Conversion remedies are designed to restore the plaintiff to the position they would have been in if the defendant had not interfered with their personal property.

Remedies for conversion include:

  • Injunction – a court order prevents the defendant from taking or using the plaintiff's property.
  • Specific performance – a court order requiring the defendant to return the property to the plaintiff.
  • Replevin – a court order requiring the sheriff to seize the property from the defendant and return it to the plaintiff.

In addition to injunctions, specific performance, and replevin, damages are crucial in compensating the plaintiff.

Calculating Fair Market Value (FMV)

Fair market value is typically determined using one of these methods:

  1. Comparative analysis: Compare the asset's price to similar items recently sold
  2. Professional appraisal: Hire a qualified expert to assess the asset's value
  3. Recent selling prices: Use data from recent sales of the asset
  4. Replacement cost: Estimate the cost to replace or reproduce the asset

FMV is often calculated for real estate by averaging the prices of at least three comparable properties recently sold in the area.

Emotional Distress Damages

While less common in conversion cases, emotional distress damages may be awarded in certain situations. These damages compensate for mental anguish or emotional trauma resulting from the conversion.

Examples might include:
  • Anxiety or stress from losing a family heirloom
  • The emotional impact of losing irreplaceable personal items
  • Mental distress caused by prolonged deprivation of essential property

Typical Compensation Ranges

Compensation in conversion cases varies widely depending on the property's value and circumstances.

Generally, it includes:
  1. The fair market value of the property at the time of conversion.
  2. Additional costs incurred in attempting to recover the property.
  3. Potential loss of use or income from the property during the conversion period.
  4. Factors Affecting Punitive Damages

In cases of egregious misconduct, courts may award punitive damages. Factors influencing these awards include:

  • The defendant's intent and degree of malice
  • The extent of harm caused to the plaintiff
  • The defendant's financial resources
  • The potential deterrent effect on similar future conduct

By considering these factors, courts strive to provide comprehensive compensation to plaintiffs in conversion cases, addressing tangible and intangible losses resulting from the wrongful interference with their property.

Related Articles:

See the other toxic torts and product liability lawsuits our lawyers have taken on.

FAQs

Can You Get Punitive Damages For Conversion?

Yes, you can get punitive damages for conversion in some cases; however, they are not guaranteed. To be eligible, you must be able to show the defendant's interference with your property was with malicious intent.

What Is The Difference Between Conversion And Trespass?

The difference between conversion and trespass is that conversion is when someone unlawfully uses or takes another person's property without permission. Trespass is an unauthorized entry onto another person's property.

Who Is Liable in a Tort of Conversion?

The person liable in a tort of conversion is someone who committed unlawful and illegal acts by taking or using another person's property without their permission.

Who Can Sue for Conversion?

Those who can sue for conversion are the lawful processors with immediate possession of property that was unlawfully taken or used. 

Do You Want To File a Conversion Claim?

If you believe you have a potential conversion claim, you should contact Schmidt & Clark, LLP and have a free consultation with an experienced attorney to discuss your legal options. 

Our attorneys can help you understand conversion rules and determine whether you have a valid claim. They can also explain the different types of remedies available to you and assist you in filing a claim.


References:

  1. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/conversion