ACTIVE LAWSUIT!
Published by The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has moved numerous lawsuits claiming injuries from hip replacement systems equipped with Stryker LFIT V40 femoral heads to a federal court in Massachusetts to manage the pretrial proceedings.
Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one had complications after hip replacement surgery, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.
Table Of Contents
What’s the Problem?
April 10, 2017 – JPML announced its decision Wednesday, consenting to a petition filed by patients who claim that Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads are defective.
At least 33 Stryker hip implant lawsuits will be centralized into an MDL in the U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, before Judge Indira Talwani. MDLs are common in litigation where a large number of similar claims are filed against the same defendant. Consolidation is intended to reduce duplicative discovery, avoid conflicting rulings by different judges, and to serve the convenience of all parties involved.
In August 2016, Stryker issued an Urgent Medical Device Recall Notification (PDF) to surgeons warning that certain LFIT V40 Femoral Heads had been linked to a higher-than-expected number of complaints involving taper lock failure.
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) later designated Stryker’s notification a Class II Medical Device Recall [1], which indicates that use of the affected hip implant components could result in adverse health complications including:
- Loss of mobility
- Pain
- Inflammation
- Adverse local tissue reaction
- Dislocation
- Joint instability
- Bone fractures around the components
- Leg length discrepancy
- Need for revision surgery
JPML initially transferred 6 Stryker LFIT lawsuits to the U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts. However, Wednesday’s Order noted 27 such complaints are currently pending in federal courts across the U.S. Those suits, as well as any future federal filings, may also be eligible for transfer to the MDL.
FAQs
What steps should I take if I am injured by a Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral head?
If injured by a Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral head, seek immediate medical attention, document the injury and any treatments, retain medical records and the device, and consult a lawyer to discuss potential legal action and compensation.
How does the design of Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads contribute to complications?
The design of Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads, which involves metal components, can contribute to complications such as metallosis, device dislocation, and tissue damage if the components wear down or fail prematurely.
Can I join a class action lawsuit if I was affected by the Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 recall?
Yes, individuals affected by the Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 recall may join a class action lawsuit if one is available. Class action lawsuits allow multiple plaintiffs to combine their cases, providing a stronger collective legal action against the manufacturer.
How long do I have to file a Stryker LFIT MDL lawsuit?
The time limit to file a Stryker LFIT MDL lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state. It’s crucial to consult with a lawyer promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the legal timeframe to preserve your rights.
Do I Have a Stryker LFIT Lawsuit?
The Medical Device Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Stryker LFIT lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new hip implant complications cases in all 50 states.
Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you had problems following hip surgery, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.