Stryker Hip Implant Recall Lawsuit in 2025 (Get the Latest Updates)

Imagine discovering that a medical device meant to improve your quality of life could instead lead to costly complications and health risks.

When Stryker Corp. recalled its hip implants in June 2012, it wasn’t just the recalled devices—it was a wake-up call to their potential dangers.

With costs ranging from $190 to $390 million for patient care, corrective surgeries, and litigation, what could this mean for those affected by the recall?

This article explores the Stryker hip recall, delving into its reasons, potential risks, and what you need to know if you’ve been affected. Stay informed as we uncover the details that could impact your health and legal options.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one suffered hip surgery complications after being implanted with the Stryker Rejuvenate or ABG II modular-neck hip devices, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

Quick Summary:

• Stryker Corp.’s hip implant recall in June 2012 is expected to cost between $190 and $390 million, covering patient diagnostics, corrective surgeries, and litigation expenses.
• The recall was initiated due to the risk of corrosion in the Rejuvenate and ABG II modular neck hip systems, which can cause tissue damage, pain, and inflammation.
• The recall affects many patients, leading to numerous lawsuits and concerns over the safety of metal-on-metal hip implants.

Update: Stryker Moves to Settle Rejuvenate, ABG II Hip Litigation

May 16, 2017 – At least 95% of eligible patients have registered for a settlement program to resolve product liability lawsuits filed over injuries alleged from Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Modular-Neck hip stems. The company has indicated that it will soon begin paying eligible parties.

Stryker Hip Replacement Complications

Stryker hip replacement complications, particularly those linked to metal-on-metal implants like the Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II modular neck systems, have raised significant concerns among medical professionals and patients alike.

These issues can lead to severe side effects, including:

• metal poisoning
• tissue damage
• chronic pain
• mobility impairments

Recognizing these complications early is crucial for effective intervention and management.

Specific Symptoms Patients Should Watch For

Patients who have received Stryker hip implants should remain vigilant for signs of potential complications. Symptoms often start subtly but can escalate if left untreated.

• Pain: Persistent hip, leg, groin, or lower back pain may indicate implant instability or tissue damage.
• Swelling: Inflammation around the implant site is a common sign of metallosis or joint irritation.
• Difficulty Walking: Instability or reduced mobility may suggest mechanical failure or component misalignment.
• Sensory Changes: A feeling of discomfort when standing or walking could indicate improper implant positioning.
• Auditory and Visual Impairments: In more severe cases, cobalt poisoning from the metal components can cause hearing loss or vision problems.

If these symptoms persist or worsen over time, seeking medical evaluation promptly is crucial to prevent further complications.

Early Warning Signs of Implant Failure

While pain and mobility issues are the most noticeable symptoms, there are additional early warning signs that may suggest an impending implant failure.

These indicators help identify problems before they become severe.

• Elevated Metal Ion Levels: High levels of cobalt or chromium in the blood can indicate metallosis, a condition caused by metal particles being released into the body.
• Crunching or Clicking Sounds: Unusual joint sounds when moving could signal wear and tear of the implant components.
• Increased Metabolic Activity on Bone Scans: Abnormal bone scan results often suggest inflammation or loosening of the implant.

Example Scenario: A patient notices increased discomfort a few months after surgery. After undergoing an MRI and blood tests, doctors detect elevated cobalt levels and tissue inflammation, indicating early-stage metallosis.

Medical Tests Used to Detect Metallosis and Other Complications

When symptoms appear, diagnostic testing plays a key role in confirming implant-related complications. Several medical tests can detect metallosis, structural failures, or infections linked to Stryker hip replacements.

Test	Purpose
Blood Tests	Measures cobalt/chromium levels to detect metal poisoning.
MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)	Provides detailed imaging of soft tissues, detecting inflammation.
X-rays	Assesses bone structure, but may not effectively show soft tissue damage.
Aspiration from Joint Fluid Analysis	Tests for infections, inflammation, or abnormal metal particles in the joint.

Each test serves a unique purpose, helping doctors diagnose complications accurately and determine the best course of action.

Long-Term Health Implications of Metal Poisoning

Prolonged exposure to metal particles, especially cobalt and chromium, can lead to serious systemic health effects beyond joint complications.

If left unaddressed, metal poisoning can cause:

• Cardiomyopathy (Heart Damage): Prolonged cobalt exposure has been linked to heart muscle deterioration.
• Neurological Issues: Cognitive impairments, memory loss, and mood changes have been observed in patients with high cobalt levels.
• Thyroid Disorders: Chronic metal toxicity can disrupt hormonal balance, potentially causing hypothyroidism.

These complications highlight why regular health monitoring is necessary for patients with metal-based implants.

Treatment Options for Different Complications

Treatment for Stryker hip replacement complications depends on the severity of the condition and the impact on daily function.

The most common approaches include:

1. Revision Surgery: If implant failure or severe tissue damage occurs, a revision procedure is necessary. This surgery replaces the defective implant with a new one, but removal can be complex, often involving bone reshaping.
2. Monitoring Metal Ion Levels: Regular blood tests help track cobalt and chromium levels, ensuring early detection of metal toxicity.
3. Physical Therapy: For patients experiencing muscle weakness or mobility limitations, therapy can restore strength and movement after implant surgery.
4. Medication for Inflammation and Pain Management: Anti-inflammatory medications may help reduce swelling and relieve pain if the implant is causing localized irritation.

However, in cases of severe metal poisoning, patients may require systemic treatments to address organ damage and neurological symptoms caused by metal toxicity.

For those experiencing serious side effects, legal options may also be available to seek compensation for medical expenses and suffering caused by defective hip replacements.

The issue of greatest concern is the potential for elevated metal ions in the bloodstream and the damage that can be caused to the muscles, tendons, soft tissue and bone, said Dr. Mary O’Connor, an orthopedic surgeon at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida. Soft tissue damage is more critical than bone damage. If the bone is damaged, we can do something. But if the muscle is dead because it has been poisoned by metal ions, we can’t recreate it, she said.

Australian Regulators Warn of Hip Failure with Stryker LFIT V40 Femoral Heads

October 5, 2016 – According to Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), last week, the agency issued a hazard alert regarding Stryker LFIT Anatomic CoCr V40 femoral heads after the devices linked to numerous reports of taper lock failure [1].

TGA noted that patients and orthopedic surgeons should be concerned about complications in patients implanted with the devices, which may include: loss of mobility, pain, inflammation, adverse tissue reactions, dislocation, broken bones around the implant, and the need for painful revision surge.

Recommended Article: MDL Court Schedules First Conference for Stryker LFIT V40 Litigation

Stryker Hip Implant FDA Warning Letter

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning letter to Stryker Corp. in November 2007, citing serious manufacturing deficiencies at the company’s Mahwah, New Jersey factory [2].

These deficiencies contributed directly to the production of faulty hip replacement devices, leading to severe complications among patients.

In addition to manufacturing issues, long-term survivorship studies have raised concerns about implant failure rates, particularly among younger patients.

Manufacturing Defects and FDA Findings

The FDA’s 2007 warning letter addressed a growing number of complaints about Stryker hip joint components, specifically regarding poor fit and premature failure.

These defective implants resulted in:

• Pain and Mobility Issues: Many recipients reported difficulty walking and persistent discomfort after implantation.
• Squeaky Joints: Some patients experienced audible squeaking noises during movement, linked to defective ceramic bearing components.
• Component Breakage and Uneven Wear: Reports indicated that pieces of the implant broke off or wore down unevenly, increasing the risk of implant failure.

The FDA investigation concluded that the deficiencies at the Mahwah facility were directly responsible for these device failures.

Long-Term Survivorship of Stryker Hip Implants

While Stryker claims a survival rate of 91.74% at 12 years, concerns remain about long-term reliability, particularly in younger patients who may require revision surgery earlier than expected.

A clinical review examined 107 patients (130 hips) who were 50 years old or younger at the time of hip replacement surgery.

The mean age at surgery was 42 years, and follow-up lasted at least 10 years (mean 12.5 years; range 10–17 years), with no patients lost to follow-up.

Implant Failure and Revision Rates

Despite the overall survivorship rate of 92.6% for both stem and cup components, certain complications emerged:

12 hips required revision surgery:

• 9 cases involved aseptic loosening of the acetabular component.
• 1 cup was revised due to pain and focal lysis.
• 1 hip required revision for recurrent dislocation.
• 1 hip underwent revision due to infection.

Additionally, radiographs revealed that 14 (12.8%) of the remaining acetabular prostheses were loose, but no femoral components showed signs of loosening.

Comparison of Stem and Cup Survivorship

• Stem Survivorship: 99% of stems remained intact, with no reported cases of aseptic loosening.
• Overall Survivorship: 92.6% at an average of 12.5 years, according to a 2008 study by the Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre [3].

Urgent Call for Patient Action

Given these findings, Schmidt & Clark, LLP urges Stryker hip prosthesis recipients to take immediate action. Even if no symptoms are present, patients should consult their doctors to assess their risk of long-term complications.

Those implanted with a Stryker Rejuvenate or ABG II modular-neck hip implant may be entitled to treatment and compensation due to the high risk of implant failure and potential long-term health complications.

While some patients experience successful outcomes, others face early revision surgery, aseptic loosening, or component failure.

Patients with affected devices should seek medical evaluation immediately to determine their risk level and explore legal options for compensation.

Stryker Hip Implant Recall Lawsuit Settlement Information

Stryker has faced numerous lawsuits over its hip replacement devices, particularly the Rejuvenate and ABG II models.

These lawsuits have resulted in significant settlements to compensate patients for injuries and complications associated with these implants.

Understanding the compensation structure and the factors affecting settlements is crucial for individuals seeking legal recourse.

Current Settlement Ranges for Different Types of Complications

Settlement amounts vary based on the severity of complications, ensuring that those who have suffered more serious consequences receive appropriate compensation.

• Revision Surgery: Patients who underwent revision surgery due to device failure may receive a base award, which can be adjusted based on factors like multiple surgeries or infections.
• Extraordinary Injuries: Enhanced payments are available for severe medical conditions such as foot drop or cardiovascular issues resulting from implant failure.
• Bilateral Implants: Patients with bilateral revisions may receive double the base amount.

These variations help ensure fair compensation, taking into account the level of harm experienced by affected individuals.

Factors That Affect Settlement Amounts

Various factors influence the final payout amount, including patient demographics, injury severity, and economic losses.

• Age and Health Status: Age-related deductions apply to patients over 70 years old. While pre-existing conditions do not reduce the base amount, they may impact overall compensation eligibility.
• Type of Injury: Patients experiencing severe injuries requiring multiple surgeries or causing long-term disabilities generally receive higher settlement amounts.
• Lost Income: Those whose earnings were significantly affected due to implant-related issues may qualify for lost wage compensation.

By considering these factors, settlement amounts are tailored to the unique circumstances of each case.

Recent Case Outcomes and Verdicts

Several high-profile cases have resulted in substantial verdicts and settlements, emphasizing the accountability placed on Stryker for implant defects.

• A Texas jury awarded $502 million in a case involving Stryker hip implants.
• Over $450 million has been recovered in various cases against Stryker by some law firms specializing in defective medical devices.

These verdicts serve as precedent, reinforcing the importance of pursuing legal claims to obtain rightful compensation.

Timeline Expectations for Settlements

The time frame for receiving settlement payments can vary, depending on the complexity of the case and the legal process involved.

1. Initial Payments: Typically begin several months after a settlement agreement is reached.
2. Ongoing Litigation: Cases that are not part of mass settlements continue through individual trials.
3. Future Claims: New claims filed after initial settlement deadlines may still be eligible, but they must adhere to state-specific statutes of limitations.

Understanding these timelines helps affected individuals set realistic expectations when pursuing compensation.

Process for Joining Existing Settlements

For those considering filing a claim, following the correct legal steps is crucial to maximizing compensation.

1. Consult an Attorney Specializing in Medical Device Litigation: Legal professionals can help determine eligibility and navigate the complexities of mass tort claims. Representation ensures that claimants receive the highest possible settlement without unnecessary reductions (e.g., 35% reduction if unrepresented).

2. Review Eligibility Criteria: Claimants must ensure that their case meets specific requirements related to the type of implant, timing of revision surgery, and the reason for revision (e.g., metallosis).

3. Submit Claims Promptly: Adhering to deadlines set by courts or settlement agreements is essential to securing compensation.

Given the ongoing nature of these legal proceedings, staying informed about recent developments is crucial for those affected by Stryker hip implant failures.

Taking proactive steps can help ensure that victims receive the financial support needed for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

Filing Deadlines for Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuits: What You Need to Know

When dealing with defective medical devices like Stryker hip implants, knowing the statute of limitations is critical.

Missing the legal deadline to file a lawsuit can prevent you from seeking compensation, no matter how severe your injuries are.

Since each state sets its own filing deadline, understanding these legal timelines—and the exceptions that may apply—is essential.

State-by-State Guide: Filing Deadlines and Exceptions

Each state has specific laws that determine how long you have to file a claim.

Here is an overview of filing deadlines in select states:

State	Statute of Limitations	Exceptions That May Extend Filing Deadlines
California	2 years from the date the injury was discovered	Delayed symptoms, mental or physical incapacitation, or defendant misconduct (e.g., fraud).
Georgia	2 years from the date of injury or discovery	Similar exceptions as California; extended time possible for minors.
New Jersey	Generally 2 years, but may vary	The Discovery Rule applies—if an injury isn’t immediately obvious, the clock starts when the plaintiff becomes aware of the harm.

Understanding these timelines ensures that you do not lose your right to compensation due to missed deadlines.

How Special Circumstances Affect Your Deadline

In some cases, exceptions may apply, allowing you more time to file:

1. Discovery Rule: The clock starts ticking when you discover the injury, not when the implant was first placed. This is crucial in cases where complications don’t appear immediately after surgery.
2. Revision Surgery & Filing Extensions: While having revision surgery does not automatically reset the statute of limitations, it can serve as evidence that the patient only recently became aware of the implant’s failure.
3. Incapacitation & Minority Status: If a person was mentally or physically incapacitated, or if they were a minor at the time of injury, the court may allow additional time before enforcing the deadline.

How Revision Surgery Impacts Filing Deadlines

Many patients only learn that their implant has failed when they need revision surgery. While this doesn’t necessarily extend your statute of limitations, it can serve as proof that the issue was only recently discovered—which may help restart the deadline under the discovery rule.

Other Factors That May Pause or Extend Deadlines

There are certain legal situations where the statute of limitations may be temporarily halted:

• Delayed Symptoms: If metallosis or other hip implant-related injuries develop gradually, this could allow for an extension.
• Defendant Misconduct: If Stryker deliberately withheld information about defects, some states may extend filing deadlines.
• State-Specific Rules: Some states allow more flexibility, while others have strict cutoffs with no exceptions.

Next Steps: Protecting Your Right to File a Claim

Given the complexity of state-by-state filing deadlines, consulting with a product liability attorney is the best way to ensure you file on time.

Here is what you should do next:

1. Speak with an attorney who specializes in medical device lawsuits. They can determine your eligibility based on your state’s statute of limitations.
2. Gather medical records and evidence. Documentation is key to proving that your injuries were caused by the defective implant.
3. File as soon as possible. Even if you believe you have time, acting quickly increases your chances of receiving a fair settlement.

Since time is a critical factor, staying informed and taking immediate action is essential for anyone affected by defective Stryker hip implants.

By understanding the deadlines and exceptions that may apply, you can take the necessary steps to protect your legal rights.

If you or a loved one has suffered from complications due to a Stryker hip implant, consult an attorney immediately to avoid missing your chance for compensation.

FAQs

How can a lawyer assist in a Stryker hip recall lawsuit?

A lawyer can assist by evaluating your case, gathering evidence, filing legal claims, negotiating settlements, and representing you in court. Their expertise ensures you receive fair compensation for your injuries and associated damages.

What should I do if my Stryker hip replacement device is recalled?

If your Stryker hip replacement device is recalled, follow the manufacturer’s recall instructions, which typically involve contacting your healthcare provider for further evaluation and potential removal or replacement of the device. Consult a lawyer if you have experienced complications.

How long do I have to file a Stryker hip recall lawsuit?

The time limit to file a Stryker hip recall lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations, varies by state. It’s crucial to consult with a lawyer promptly to ensure your claim is filed within the legal timeframe to preserve your rights.

What evidence is needed to support a Stryker hip recall lawsuit?

Evidence needed to support a Stryker hip recall lawsuit includes medical records showing the implantation and complications, expert testimony linking the device to the injuries, and any documentation of additional surgeries or treatments required.

Related Articles:

• Stryker ShapeMatch Lawsuit
• Alaska Stryker LFIT V40 Hip Implant Lawsuit
• Stryker LFIT V40 Lawsuits may be Consolidated into MDL

See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Get a Free Stryker Hip Implant Recall Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

The Medical Device Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Stryker Hip Recall Lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and are currently accepting new injury cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you or a loved one suffered hip surgery complications after being implanted with the Stryker Rejuvenate or ABG II modular-neck hip devices, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by a suit and we can help.

References:

1. https://www.tga.gov.au/alert/lfit-anatomic-cocr-v40-femoral-heads-used-hip-replacements
2. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRes/res.cfm?ID=149782
3. https://misuse.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/error/abuse.shtml