Table of contents
- Latest Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit Updates
- October 1, 2026: Roundup MDL Report Lists 1,104 Pending Actions
- September 14, 2026: Fairness Hearing Held on Roundup Class Settlement
- June 25, 2026: Supreme Court Rules on Roundup Label Warning Claims
- June 17, 2026: Federal Judge Sends Class Settlement Case Back to Missouri Court
- March 4, 2026: St. Louis Court Preliminarily Approves Roundup Settlement
- February 17, 2026: Monsanto Announces Proposed Class Settlement
- August 9, 2021: California Court of Appeal Affirms Pilliod Judgment
- May 14, 2021: Ninth Circuit Affirms Hardeman Judgment
- June 24, 2020: Bayer Announces Roundup Litigation Agreements
- March 27, 2019: Federal Jury Awards Hardeman About $80 Million
- October 3, 2016: JPML Centralizes Roundup Cases as MDL No. 2741
- March 20, 2015: IARC Classifies Glyphosate as Probably Carcinogenic
- What Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
- Who May Be Affected?
- Reported Injuries or Damages
- Evidence to Preserve
- Filing Deadlines
- Potential Compensation
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Can Roundup Cause Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
- Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Covered by the Roundup Settlement?
- How Much Is the Roundup Settlement for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
- Have Juries Found That Roundup Caused Lymphoma?
- What Did the Supreme Court Decide in the Roundup Durnell Case?
- How Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated?
- References
Roundup, the glyphosate-based weedkiller made by Monsanto, is the subject of lawsuits from people who developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Plaintiffs allege Roundup caused their cancer, and Monsanto denies the claims.
The cases sit in federal MDL No. 2741, in state courts and in a proposed class settlement worth up to $7.25 billion. The settlement names DLBCL as a covered type and awaits final approval.
The Supreme Court ruled on June 25, 2026 that federal law blocks a state-law claim that Roundup needed a cancer warning on its label.
Lawsuit at a glance
- Case or litigation name: In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2741) and Randall King, et al. v. Monsanto Company (class settlement)
- Defendants: Monsanto Company
- Court and docket number, when available: MDL No. 2741, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California; King v. Monsanto, No. 2622-CC00325, Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri
- MDL number, judge, and case count, when an MDL exists: MDL No. 2741, Judge Vince Chhabria, Northern District of California; 1,104 actions pending per the JPML report of October 1, 2026
- Filing date: October 3, 2016 (Roundup actions centralized as MDL No. 2741)
- Main allegations: Plaintiffs allege that Roundup, particularly its active ingredient glyphosate, causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and that Monsanto failed to warn; Monsanto denies the claims
- Products or people involved: Roundup and other glyphosate-based Roundup Products; people with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, after exposure
Latest Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit Updates
October 1, 2026: Roundup MDL Report Lists 1,104 Pending Actions
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation report dated October 1, 2026 lists 1,104 actions pending in the federal Roundup MDL, In re: Roundup Products Liability Litigation [1]. The MDL has had 5,324 actions in total since it began. The August 3, 2026 report listed 3,932 pending actions, and the September 1, 2026 report listed 3,925.September 14, 2026: Fairness Hearing Held on Roundup Class Settlement
The Missouri court held the fairness hearing on the proposed Roundup class settlement. The official settlement website says the Missouri judge had not ruled on final approval [2]. Registration and claim submission for the settlement stay unavailable until final approval is granted. The website also says it is not known how long the decision will take.June 25, 2026: Supreme Court Rules on Roundup Label Warning Claims
The Supreme Court decided Monsanto Co. v. Durnell, No. 24-1068, by a 7-2 vote, reversing the Missouri judgment [3]. Justice Kavanaugh wrote the opinion. The Court held that FIFRA preempts Durnell’s state-law failure-to-warn claim. The claim would require a cancer warning on Roundup’s label that EPA has not required. The Court heard argument on April 27, 2026.June 17, 2026: Federal Judge Sends Class Settlement Case Back to Missouri Court
Judge Henry E. Autrey of the Eastern District of Missouri remanded King v. Monsanto to the state courts of Missouri [4]. The class settlement case had been moved to federal court before then. In its statement, Monsanto said the remand returned jurisdiction over the class settlement to the Missouri Circuit Court. Bayer, Monsanto’s parent company, published the statement on June 17, 2026.March 4, 2026: St. Louis Court Preliminarily Approves Roundup Settlement
According to weedkillerclass.com, the St. Louis court granted preliminary approval of Monsanto’s proposed Roundup class settlement. The website sets June 4, 2026 as the opt-out and objection deadline and September 14, 2026 as the fairness hearing date.February 17, 2026: Monsanto Announces Proposed Class Settlement
Monsanto announced a proposed nationwide class settlement of current and future Roundup claims alleging non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Monsanto filed the proposed settlement in the St. Louis city Circuit Court [5]. Funding runs up to $7.25 billion, paid in capped annual installments that decline over as many as 21 years.August 9, 2021: California Court of Appeal Affirms Pilliod Judgment
The California Court of Appeal, First District, affirmed the judgment in Pilliod v. Monsanto, A158228 [6]. Alva Pilliod was diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in June 2011 and Alberta Pilliod in April 2015. After a six-week trial, the jury awarded each a $1 billion punitive award. The trial court reduced the totals to about $56 million for Alberta and about $31 million for Alva. The Pilliods accepted the reductions.May 14, 2021: Ninth Circuit Affirms Hardeman Judgment
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment for Edwin Hardeman in Hardeman v. Monsanto, Nos. 19-16636 and 19-16708. The case came from the first bellwether trial of the federal Roundup MDL [7]. The judgment was $5,267,634.10 in compensatory damages and $20 million in punitive damages. The district court had cut the jury’s $75 million punitive award. Hardeman had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, not specifically DLBCL.June 24, 2020: Bayer Announces Roundup Litigation Agreements
Bayer, which owns Monsanto, announced agreements with total payments of $10.1 billion to $10.9 billion. They aimed to resolve current Roundup litigation and address potential future claims [8]. The agreements resolved about 75% of roughly 125,000 filed and unfiled claims, according to the Bayer press release. That figure counted both lawsuits and claims not yet filed in court.March 27, 2019: Federal Jury Awards Hardeman About $80 Million
A federal jury awarded Edwin Hardeman about $80 million and found Roundup responsible for his non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to ABC7 [9]. Bayer said it was disappointed and would appeal. Hardeman’s attorney said he bought a bottle of Roundup concentrate, mixed it himself and used it for over 26 years. He was diagnosed in 2014.October 3, 2016: JPML Centralizes Roundup Cases as MDL No. 2741
The Panel centralized the Roundup actions in the Northern District of California as MDL No. 2741 [10]. It described the actions as arising out of allegations that Roundup, particularly glyphosate, causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The Panel repeated that description in its transfer order dated December 11, 2025. That order cites the Panel’s 2016 decision creating the MDL.March 20, 2015: IARC Classifies Glyphosate as Probably Carcinogenic
The International Agency for Research on Cancer announced that a Working Group of 17 experts from 11 countries classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2A) [11]. The Working Group met March 3 to 10, 2015. It based the classification on “limited” evidence in humans, “sufficient” evidence in experimental animals and “strong” evidence for genotoxicity. The human evidence concerned non-Hodgkin lymphoma.What Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. It grows quickly in the lymph nodes, and other organs are often also affected [12]. The California Court of Appeal’s Pilliod opinion calls DLBCL “a common type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma” that “is considered an aggressive cancer.”Who May Be Affected?
People diagnosed with DLBCL may fall within the proposed class settlement. They need U.S. contact with Roundup Products before February 17, 2026, and must have been a U.S. citizen or lived in the U.S. on March 4, 2026. The official settlement FAQs name DLBCL as a covered condition [13]. The List of NHL Subtypes includes “Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), NOS” and other variants [14]. Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma are not covered. The settlement site separates Occupational Claimants from Residential Claimants. Occupational Claimants need documents such as employment, payroll or tax records. People who opted out by June 4, 2026 keep the right to file their own lawsuit. Someone with a claim pending in MDL No. 2741 on February 17, 2026 must ask to be included and dismiss that claim. In Pilliod, both plaintiffs had sprayed Roundup on four residential properties, starting in 1982. Only an individual legal review can say whether a claim applies to you. Our Roundup lawsuit overview explains the wider litigation.Think you may qualify?
Schmidt & Clark offers a free case review for people who believe Roundup exposure may be connected to a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma diagnosis. A review does not promise eligibility or any result.
Start My Free Case Review
Reported Injuries or Damages
Plaintiffs allege that Roundup, particularly its active ingredient glyphosate, caused their non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Monsanto denies that Roundup causes NHL and denies any wrongdoing. NCI says DLBCL signs may include fever, drenching night sweats and weight loss. In the Pilliod record, Alva Pilliod’s stage IV DLBCL appeared in his bones. Alberta Pilliod’s appeared in her central nervous system. The IARC Monographs Volume 112 summary says glyphosate “also caused DNA and chromosomal damage in human cells” [15]. EPA’s glyphosate page says EPA concluded glyphosate is “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans” [16]. The Agricultural Health Study followed 54,251 pesticide applicators. Andreotti and colleagues found no association with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or its subtypes [17]. A 2019 meta-analysis by Zhang and colleagues reported a meta-relative risk of 1.41 for NHL as a group, not DLBCL alone, in the highest exposure groups [18].Evidence to Preserve
Keep any record that shows the diagnosis and your Roundup use. Store the originals safely. Do not throw away product containers or old paperwork, even if a case seems far off. Useful items include:- A pathology report that names the lymphoma type, and the date of diagnosis.
- Treatment records and other medical records from your doctors, clinics and hospitals.
- Receipts, photos and containers of the Roundup product, with notes on when, where and how you used it.
- Employment, payroll, business license or tax records that show work with the product. The settlement site lists these as proof for occupational claimants.
- Notes on the dates of your first and last exposure to the product.
- Emails, texts and letters that mention the product, how you used it or your diagnosis.
Filing Deadlines
Filing deadlines for a Roundup injury claim come from state law. They depend on where you live and when your exposure, illness and diagnosis happened. Some states start the clock at diagnosis. Missing a deadline can end a claim even when the facts are strong, so talk to a lawyer promptly. The class settlement runs on its own dates. People diagnosed with NHL as of March 4, 2026 register within 180 days after final approval and file a claim within 180 days after any appeals end.Potential Compensation
Damages in Roundup cases can include medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. Settlement tiers depend on exposure type, age and NHL type. The settlement website says eligible people “Could Receive $6,000 to $165,000+”. On July 20, 2020, the Court of Appeal cut the Johnson v. Monsanto judgment to $10,253,209.32 in compensatory and $10,253,209.32 in punitive damages [19]. Johnson’s cancer is not stated as DLBCL in the opinion. Compensation amounts vary by case. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Potential compensation in the class settlement is paid by tier.Frequently Asked Questions
Can Roundup Cause Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
Whether Roundup can cause diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is disputed. EPA says its glyphosate finding differs from IARC’s classification. EPA assesses risk under expected real-world exposures, while IARC asks whether a chemical can cause cancer under any conditions.Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Covered by the Roundup Settlement?
Yes, the Roundup class settlement covers diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by name. Its FAQs list it with follicular lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, aggressive NK-cell leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. BrownGreer PLC, the administrator, answers questions at 1-888-403-8201.How Much Is the Roundup Settlement for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma?
The Roundup settlement does not set one amount for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Awards depend on nine tiers. An actual award can range from 80% to 120% of the tier average. The settlement also includes a $1 billion security fund.Have Juries Found That Roundup Caused Lymphoma?
Juries have returned verdicts for plaintiffs who said Roundup caused their lymphoma, including Edwin Hardeman and the Pilliods. Monsanto disputes the Hardeman verdict. A Missouri jury also awarded John Durnell $1.25 million after a 9-day trial. The Supreme Court reversed that judgment.What Did the Supreme Court Decide in the Roundup Durnell Case?
The Supreme Court decided in the Roundup Durnell case that FIFRA preempts John Durnell’s claim. Justice Jackson dissented, joined by Justice Gorsuch. The Solicitor General argued as amicus curiae, and review was limited to label-based failure-to-warn claims.How Is Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated?
Treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is decided by the patient’s doctors. NCI says treatment of aggressive stage II, III or IV non-Hodgkin lymphoma may include rituximab with combination chemotherapy. Options for relapsed or refractory DLBCL include tafasitamab plus lenalidomide.References
- https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/Pending_MDL_Dockets_By_Actions_Pending-October-1-2026.pdf
- https://www.weedkillerclass.com/
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1068_n7ip.pdf
- https://www.bayer.com/media/en-us/federal-judge-remands-monsanto-class-settlement-case–back-to-missouri-state-court/
- https://www.bayer.com/media/download/845805d7-83cd-4432-be57-26bba5a14bdf/2026-0034e.pdf
- https://courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/A158228.PDF
- https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2021/05/14/19-16636.pdf
- https://www.bayer.com/media/en-us/bayer-announces-agreements-to-resolve-major-legacy-monsanto-litigation/
- https://abc7news.com/post/bay-area-man-awarded-$80-million-after-a-jury-said-roundup-caused-his-cancer/5221755/
- https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-2741-Transfer_Order-12-25.pdf
- https://www.iarc.who.int/featured-news/media-centre-iarc-news-glyphosate/
- https://www.cancer.gov/types/lymphoma/patient/adult-nhl-treatment-pdq
- https://www.weedkillerclass.com/Home/FAQs
- https://www.weedkillerclass.com/Docs/List_of_NHL_Subtypes.pdf
- https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/MonographVolume112-1.pdf
- https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/glyphosate
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29136183/
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31342895/
- https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/A155940.PDF


