Concealed Carry in Las Vegas Casinos: What You Need to Know

Can You Conceal Carry in Las Vegas Casinos?

According to Nevada’s concealed carry laws, it is legal to carry a concealed weapon in casinos, even if signs prohibit firearms [1].

NRS 202.3673 restricts concealed carry in specific public buildings, such as airports, schools, childcare facilities, and properties of the Nevada System of Higher Education. However, private businesses, including casinos, can ask you to leave if they discover you have a concealed weapon. Refusing to comply may result in trespassing charges

Can Casinos Search You for Guns?

Casinos cannot force you to undergo a search for firearms, but they can require searches before allowing entry. You might need to pass through a metal detector or agree to a security search. Many modern casinos also use artificial intelligence to detect concealed firearms. You can refuse these searches, but doing so will likely result in being denied entry and asked to leave the premises.

Is Nevada a Constitutional Carry State?

Nevada is not a constitutional carry state. While open carry is allowed without a permit, you need a concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm. NRS 202.3667 mandates that anyone carrying a concealed firearm must have a valid permit and identification. Failing to present these when requested by law enforcement can result in a $25 fine per violation. Carrying a concealed weapon without a permit can lead to much more severe penalties.

Can You Go to Jail for Carrying Concealed Without a Permit in Nevada?

Carrying a concealed firearm without a valid CCW permit in Nevada is illegal and can result in serious criminal charges [2].

Individuals found to be carrying concealed handguns without a permit may be charged with a misdemeanor offense, punishable by fines, probation, and in some cases, jail time. Carrying a concealed weapon without a permit in Nevada could lead to serious consequences.

Exceptions Where Concealed Carry is Illegal in Nevada

While Nevada generally permits concealed carry with a valid CCW permit, certain locations and situations prohibit it:

Gun-Free Zones: Schools, government buildings, airports, and other designated gun-free zones prohibit both open and concealed carry of firearms.
Private Property Restrictions: Private property owners, including businesses and residences, can ban firearms on their premises. Violating these restrictions can lead to legal consequences.
Prohibited Persons: Individuals prohibited from possessing firearms, such as convicted felons and those adjudicated as mentally ill, cannot obtain a CCW permit and are forbidden from carrying concealed weapons.

Pros and Cons of Concealed Carry

Pro 1: Boosting Safety through Constitutional Carry
Constitutional carry laws enhance both individual and public safety by allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed firearms. Criminals, who typically disregard firearm restrictions, are deterred by the uncertainty of who might be armed. This increased risk for criminals can prevent crimes such as robberies, where the presence of armed citizens can turn a simple theft into a risky endeavor for the perpetrator [3].

Allowing lawful citizens to carry firearms also ensures quicker responses to active shooter situations. Police response times average seven minutes nationally, extending to 14 minutes in rural areas. During these critical moments, armed citizens can intervene more rapidly, potentially reducing casualties. Notably, five of the ten states with the lowest violent crime rates, including the top three—Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont—permit constitutional carry, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing safety.

Pro 2: Upholding the Second Amendment

The Second Amendment protects “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms.” The Amendment clearly states that the right “shall not be infringed.” Constitutional carry laws simply protect the “fundamental right to carry a firearm for self-defense as enshrined in our Constitution – as opposed to a government privilege that citizens must ask permission to exercise.

Pro 3: Reducing Bureaucratic Barriers
Permits for carrying concealed weapons add unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles. States that implement constitutional carry laws streamline this process, eliminating redundant bureaucracy. This also removes financial barriers and potential biases in the permitting process, making it easier for individuals, particularly those in lower economic positions, to exercise their right to self-defense. For instance, a woman facing domestic abuse can avoid the prohibitive costs of training and application fees, enabling her to protect herself without financial strain.

Con 1: Loss of Safety Measures
Constitutional carry laws remove critical safety measures such as training and background checks, which are essential for responsible gun ownership. Without these safeguards, individuals may lack the necessary skills to handle firearms safely. Research indicates that states with weak or no permit requirements experience increases in violent crime and handgun homicides. Untrained individuals carrying concealed guns may escalate conflicts, turning non-lethal situations into deadly encounters.

Con 2: Misinterpretation of the Second Amendment
The Second Amendment does not explicitly guarantee the right to carry concealed weapons for individuals; it ensures the right of state militias to bear arms. Historically, Americans faced restrictions on traveling with guns, and concealed carry was widely outlawed by the 1880s. Thus, there is no constitutional basis for individual concealed carry without permits.

Con 3: Psychological and Social Impacts
Allowing concealed carry without permits overlooks the psychological and social implications. Humans are not naturally equipped to handle the emotional burden of carrying a deadly weapon constantly. Situations involving ego and anger can lead to irrevocable deadly decisions. Journalist Tom Demerly, who has experience in conflict zones, argues that the responsibility and potential consequences of carrying a gun outweigh the perceived benefits. A society less reliant on arms to solve and prevent problems aligns more with the vision of a peaceful community.

The progression from reasonable gun control to permitless carry poses significant risks, potentially leading to a society governed by the threat of force. This shift could create a reality where reliance on arms becomes the norm, contrary to a vision of a society less dependent on weapons for safety and conflict resolution.

Related Articles:

See all related personal injury lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Get a Free Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

The Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focuses on the representation of plaintiffs in lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and are currently accepting new legal challenges in all 50 states.

If you or a loved one was involved with these matters, you should contact our law firm immediately for a free case evaluation. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

References:
1. https://www.adrasandaltiglaw.com/nevada-laws-concealed-carry-in-casino/
2. https://www.blgwins.com/can-you-conceal-carry-in-las-vegas-casinos/
3. https://concealedguns.procon.org/

Can You Carry a Concealed Weapon in a Nevada Casino?