FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

What Is Lucid Interval? (How This Affects Legal Decisions)

Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.


If you or a loved one has experienced a lucid interval—a temporary period of regained mental clarity—it can impact legal decisions, particularly in matters of will validity and testamentary capacity.

Lucid intervals allow individuals who usually lack mental capacity, such as those with dementia, to make sound decisions in brief moments of clarity.

Courts have upheld wills and other decisions made during these intervals, as seen in cases like Murrey v. Barnett National Bank and Raimi v. Furlong.

Understanding how lucid intervals are evaluated can be crucial in estate planning or in contesting wills, and acting quickly to gather evidence is essential for successful legal action.

Schmidt & Clark lawyers have dealt with countless lucid interval cases for over two decades. Today, we’ll explain what this is and how it affects the capacity to sign and testamentary capacity.

Quick Summary

  • A lucid interval is the period of time during which a mentally ill person regains vc.
  • Contracts signed during a lucid interval are seen as valid.
  • Several requirements must be met for a mentally ill person to have testamentary capacity.

What is Lucid Interval?

A nurse accommodating a patient in hospital bed

Lucid interval is a legal doctrine according to which a person who has a mental illness or a neurological condition can have periods in which their ability to reason is preserved.

“Lucid interval refers to a brief period during which an insane person regains sanity that is sufficient to regain the legal capacity to contract and to act on his/her own behalf. Lucid interval also refers to the period during which a person has enough mental capacity to understand the concept of marriage and the duties and obligation it imposes.” USLegal 

During this period, a person is temporarily restored to legal sanity. They are considered to have enough intelligence and judgment to sign contracts and testaments and perform other legal acts.

The person's legal actions during this time are seen as valid and not disqualified by the disease.

There’s no need for a full mental recovery for a lucid interval to happen. If the person knows they are making a legally-binding action and understands what’s required of them, all decisions they make during this period are valid. Also, the person can’t claim insanity for acts done during a lucid interval.

Lucid Interval and Capacity to Sign

Woman signing a contract while in lying in hospital bed

Supreme Court of Florida determined the test for incompetency in 1891 [1]. They established that if a person fully understood the nature of the transaction, the document is valid.

It means that if a mentally ill person has a period during which they regain their abilities, they have the full capacity to sign. 

If they change their mind, or someone wants to challenge the validity of this document, the court will check:

  • The medical and physical history of the signee
  • Medical and psychiatric opinions
  • Signee’s conduct during the time of signing the document
  • Other circumstances surrounding the signing, such as if the signee was under the influence, fairness, and complexity of the transaction.

Testamentary Capacity

A woman being examined by doctor with interviewAccording to the Raimi v. Furlong case from 1997, the test for testamentary capacity is lower compared to the test for capacity to sign a contract [2].

The court established that an insane person can execute a valid will if they have a lucid interval.

This stands even if the testator is frequently intoxicated, under the influence of narcotics, or has a failing memory.

For a mentally ill person to have testamentary capacity, five requirements have to be met:

  • The signee must understand what they are engaged in.
  • The signee must understand the effects of the will.
  • The signee must understand the extent of their property and holdings.
  • The signee must understand to whom the property will pass on.
  • The signee must understand all of the previous points at once and be able to understand how they are connected.

For a testamentary capacity to be valid during a lucid interval, the signee mustn’t be under the influence of another party.

As long as all of the above conditions are met, and the person signing the will has a lucid interval, they can execute the document, and the will is considered valid.

Sometimes, the will can be contested. In this case, the testamentary capacity has to be proven during the probate process.

The party who wants to uphold the will is called the will proponent, and they must prove that the testator had the mental capacity at the time of signing.

Note: If you’re in a position where testamentary capacity is challenged, you should hire an estate planning attorney to protect your interests.

Navigating legal decisions during lucid intervals requires a clear, structured framework to assess the type of document involved, the necessary capacity level, and evidence requirements.

This decision tree approach helps clarify the steps needed based on the legal context, ensuring each decision meets the capacity standards for validity.

Type of Legal Document

    • Will or Testament
      • Lucid Interval Requirement: Testamentary capacity must be present at the time of signing.
    • Power of Attorney
      • Lucid Interval Requirement: Requires a clear understanding of the powers being granted.
    • Contractual Agreements
      • Lucid Interval Requirement: Must show the capacity to comprehend terms and conditions.

Determining Levels of Legal Capacity

Assessing the capacity needed is essential for validating legal actions made during lucid intervals. Each capacity level reflects the cognitive clarity required for different types of decisions.

  • Full Capacity: The individual fully understands and appreciates the nature and consequences of their decisions.Example: Someone who can articulate their wishes and grasp the implications of a will.
  • Partial Capacity (Lucid Interval): The individual has moments of clarity within an overall state of cognitive decline.Example: A person with dementia who can recognize family members and state their wishes during a lucid period.
  • No Capacity: The individual lacks the cognitive ability to understand decisions due to impairment.Example: Someone who cannot recognize family members or understand the concept of a will.

Essential Evidence for Proving Lucid Intervals

To substantiate claims regarding decisions made during a lucid interval, strong evidence is needed to show the individual’s mental clarity at the time. Courts require thorough documentation to assess whether a person’s mental state meets the necessary standards for making sound legal decisions.

Here are key types of evidence to gather:

  • Medical Documentation: Records from healthcare professionals that detail the individual’s mental state over time.
  • Witness Testimonies: Statements from those present during the lucid interval attest to the person’s cognitive clarity. The witnesses need to be:
    • Two disinterested witnesses minimum
    • No family members within third-degree
    • No financial beneficiaries
    • One professional witness (attorney/doctor)
  • Video or Audio Recordings: Recordings capture the individual clearly expressing their wishes during a lucid interval.

Steps to Challenge a Will Based on Capacity

Challenging a will on mental capacity involves several key steps, each aimed at demonstrating the individual’s state of mind during the decision-making period.

Here’s how the process typically unfolds:

  • Filing a Contest: Family members or interested parties may file a formal contest to dispute the validity of a will or legal document due to a lack of capacity.
  • Gathering Evidence: Collect all relevant documentation, such as medical records and witness statements, to build a case around the individual’s mental state.
  • Court Hearings: Attend court hearings where evidence is presented; both sides will have the chance to argue the individual’s capacity during the contested period.

FAQ

Can a lucid interval occur in other types of injuries besides brain injuries?

While most commonly associated with brain injuries, a lucid interval can theoretically occur in other types of injuries where there is a temporary period of apparent recovery followed by a sudden deterioration, though this is less common.

Can a lucid interval affect the outcome of a personal injury lawsuit?

Yes, a lucid interval can affect the outcome of a personal injury lawsuit by complicating the determination of when and how the injury's effects became evident. The apparent recovery period may lead to disputes about the severity of the injury and the timing of medical treatment or intervention.

What symptoms might follow a lucid interval in a traumatic brain injury case?

Symptoms following a lucid interval in a traumatic brain injury case may include sudden loss of consciousness, severe headache, confusion, vomiting, seizures, or neurological deficits like weakness or numbness on one side of the body. These symptoms indicate a worsening condition that requires immediate medical attention.

Hire an Experienced Attorneys for a Lucid Interval Case

A lucid interval is a period in which a mentally ill person or a person suffering from a medical condition fully uses their mental capacities and can show sound judgment.

According to the law, all contracts, including testamentary capacity, signed during this time are seen as valid.

If you think your loved one has been taken advantage of during a time they didn’t have the full use of their mental capacities, you should hire an attorney.

Schmidt & Clark, LLP lawyers have experience dealing with lucid intervals. We’ll provide legal advice, explain if you have sufficient grounds for a case, and the next steps to take.

Contact us for a free consultation today.


References:

1.https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/mental-illness-and-the-right-to-contract/ 

2.https://casetext.com/case/raimi-v-furlong