FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
If you or someone you know has experienced complications from hernia mesh, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is here to help. Recognized for our expertise in plaintiff representation, our primary goal is to ensure you receive the justice and compensation you’re entitled to.

Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review

Quick Summary

  • Legal Trends: Our article breaks down the latest legal trends in hernia mesh litigation in Ohio, highlighting significant case outcomes and judicial decisions. This analysis helps you grasp how these trends could influence the strategy and potential success of your lawsuit.
  • Settlement Updates: Stay informed with the most recent settlement updates, providing a clearer picture of what compensation figures have looked like for similar cases. These insights can guide your expectations and decisions as you consider the financial aspects of pursuing legal action.
  • Actionable Steps Forward: We outline concrete steps you can take if impacted by a hernia mesh implant, from documenting your medical journey to consulting with a specialized attorney. This guidance aims to empower you with knowledge and confidence as you navigate the complexities of your legal journey.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

In the heartland of America, a legal storm is brewing. Thousands of hernia mesh lawsuits are underway in Ohio as individuals who suffered injuries following their hernia mesh implants seek justice.

Over 20,000 cases have been filed against major manufacturers due to serious complications and injuries caused by the mesh implants, highlighting the severity of the issue.

The lawsuits mainly stem from the severe injuries and complications triggered by hernia mesh, which often necessitate revision surgery.

Numerous patients have reported these complications following their mesh implantation, leading to an influx of legal action. With the rising number of lawsuits, it’s natural to question the manufacturers of these faulty hernia mesh devices.

Hernia Mesh Manufacturers in Ohio Lawsuits

The legal claims in Ohio are not directed at a single entity but rather at a handful of manufacturers who have produced the problematic hernia mesh devices. These include industry giants such as Atrium, Bard, Ethicon, and Covidien, who are facing a bulk of the lawsuits.

Other manufacturers embroiled in the hernia mesh litigation in Ohio are Gore Medical and Genzyme.

The involvement of multiple manufacturers in these lawsuits indicates a widespread issue with hernia mesh devices across different producers.

What Is Hernia Mesh?

According to a 2023 notice from the FDA, hernia mesh is a medical device designed to provide additional support to weakened or damaged tissue [1].

It’s most often used to treat hernias, conditions wherein an organ pushes through an opening in the muscle or tissue holding it in place. As beneficial as it may sound when the product is faulty, it can lead to severe complications and injuries.

This reality has led to a wave of hernia mesh claims and lawsuits against hernia mesh manufacturers, including the possibility of a hernia mesh class action.

Patients who underwent hernia repair surgery and later experienced serious complications, particularly with products made by certain manufacturers, may be eligible to join the litigation.

Latest Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates

As of March 2024, the legal terrain is shifting rapidly. Over 25,000 hernia surgical mesh lawsuits remain pending across different Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs), a staggering number that underscores the scale of this issue.

Amid this sea of litigation, bellwether trials and settlement negotiations, including those related to the Bard hernia mesh lawsuit, are making significant strides. In the midst of these proceedings, the hernia mesh trial outcomes will play a crucial role in determining future settlements and resolutions.

Another bellwether trial, scheduled for April 2024, is on the horizon. The outcome of this trial could significantly influence the momentum of settlement negotiations. Meanwhile, status conferences to discuss the handling of Bard Hernia Mesh lawsuits are set for early 2024. These discussions could address a global settlement or further bellwether trials.

However, it’s not just the Bard cases that are seeing action. The Ethicon MDL, for instance, remains active despite a confidential settlement in the prior year and several cases being dismissed in April 2023. 

The Role of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in Ohio Cases

Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal mechanism that allows multiple similar cases from different districts to be consolidated for pre-trial proceedings, promoting efficiency and consistency.

In the context of Ohio, MDL has been instrumental in consolidating hernia mesh lawsuits, with a notable example being the MDL titled In re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation – MDL-2846.

As of the latest updates, hernia mesh lawsuits in this MDL have progressed to include several bellwether trials, which serve as test cases that help gauge the potential outcome of future cases.

The hernia mesh MDL alone encompasses a significant number of litigations, with more than 20,000 cases consolidated and nearly 400 new cases just in November 2023, reflecting the ongoing nature of this mass tort. You might be curious about how the bard hernia mesh class influences the settlements.

MDL processes play a critical role in hernia mesh lawsuit settlements. They involve settlement negotiations aimed at efficiently resolving large groups of lawsuits. The appointment of a settlement mediator in the Bard hernia mesh MDL marked a significant progression toward reaching global settlements.

Why Are People Filing Hernia Mesh Lawsuits?

People are filing hernia mesh lawsuits because the adverse effects experienced after surgery have been severe and life-altering. These legal claims are a demand for accountability, aiming to secure justice and financial compensation for the suffering, additional medical treatments, and income loss that patients have endured as a result of hernia mesh complications.

The increasing number of lawsuits underscores the widespread nature of the issue and the urgent need for legal redress.

Complications Named in the Lawsuits

According to a 2020 research by Science Direct, the complications cited in hernia mesh lawsuits are as diverse as they are distressing. One such complication is infection, which can manifest as localized redness or swelling near the surgical site or as systemic symptoms like fever and chills, potentially leading to sepsis [2].

Another complication of hernia mesh surgery is adhesion and scarring. These can lead to:

  • Chronic pain
  • Discomfort
  • Difficulty with mobility
  • Necessity for further surgeries

Seromas, or pockets of fluid, can also build up around the surgery site, requiring medical intervention to resolve.

More severe complications include mesh erosion, wherein the hernia mesh implant breaks down and erodes through surrounding tissue, causing pain and inflammation and potentially leading to infection or other complications.

Studies have shown that surgical mesh can reduce the rate of hernia recurrence. However, some hernia mesh also has a high failure rate and can cause severe or even life-threatening complications. – National Library of Medicine

Who Qualifies To File a Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?

Individuals who have undergone surgery to repair a hernia since January 1, 2006, may be eligible to join the legal battle, provided they experienced medical complications from the mesh that necessitated revision surgery. This specific set of circumstances qualifies to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.

Even if a potential claimant has had their hernia mesh claim declined or discharged by another firm, they may still be able to seek legal help with their case. There’s also a time limit to take legal action for hernia mesh complications, known as the statute of limitations, which varies by state.

Patients who experienced the following complications as a result of hernia mesh may be eligible for a lawsuit:

  • Adherence
  • Pain
  • Fluid buildup
  • Sepsis
  • Bowel perforation
  • Hernia recurrence
  • Intestinal blockage
  • Bleeding
  • Fistula formation
  • Infections
  • Mesh rejection
  • Organ puncture
  • Mesh migration
  • Bowel obstruction
  • Abscesses

You might be wondering about the potential compensation these victims can expect.

Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Ohio

The journey to justice for hernia mesh victims in Ohio often culminates in hernia mesh settlement outcomes. The settlement amounts, however, can vary significantly, with compensation estimates ranging from $60,000 to $1 million, depending on the specifics of each case.

Bellwether trials have played a pivotal role in setting the stage for these settlements. They create precedence and apply pressure on the defendants toward settlement discussions.

Recent verdicts have seen significant awards like a $500,000 award in the Stinson Bellwether trial against Bard and a substantial $4.8 million judgment in Rhode Island against a Bard subsidiary.

In the face of these verdicts, various settlement negotiations have taken place, such as Ethicon and Johnson & Johnson settling 224 cases and discussions for a global settlement in the Bard cases.

Historically, settlements in the Kugel hernia mesh litigation have set a benchmark, averaging around $70,000 per claim, which may influence current and future hernia mesh lawsuit settlements.

Factors Influencing Settlement Amounts

Several factors primarily influence the settlement amounts:

  • The severity of injuries
  • The economic impact, which encompasses medical expenses, lost wages, and legal bills
  • The impact on a plaintiff’s quality of life, including how personal relationships may be affected by hernia mesh complications

Potential Compensation for Victims of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits in Ohio

Ohio hernia mesh victims may receive compensatory damages to cover both economic losses, like medical bills and lost wages, and noneconomic losses, such as pain and suffering. Victims may seek reimbursement for medical expenses and compensation for lost wages due to hernia mesh complications.

Compensatory damages could also encompass future medical expenses and lost earning capacity owing to the long-term effects of the hernia mesh. Pain and suffering awards include compensation for physical discomfort, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life due to the hernia mesh.

Average estimated payouts for hernia mesh lawsuits fall between $70,000 and $90,000, varying with injury severity and case details. A tiered points system may classify settlement amounts by complication severity, from most to least serious outcomes.

The impact on the victim’s life, the severity of the injuries, and unique case circumstances significantly influence compensation variability. Future medical care costs, including necessary surgeries due to hernia mesh complications, might be included in the compensation.

Filing an Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Filing a hernia mesh lawsuit may seem daunting, but breaking it down into steps can simplify the process. The first step involves gathering all medical records that document the implantation of the hernia mesh, any subsequent treatments, and any complications that have arisen.

Next, consult with a qualified attorney to discuss the specifics of your hernia mesh case and to understand the legal strategy for your lawsuit.

Once you’ve gathered your evidence and consulted with an attorney, it’s time to file your lawsuit in the appropriate Ohio court, ensuring that the complaint details your allegations and the compensation you are seeking.

Prepare for the pre-trial processes, such as discovery and depositions, and be ready to proceed to trial if the case does not settle. You may be curious about the kind of evidence required in court.

Types of Evidence To Present

Presenting compelling evidence is crucial in a hernia mesh lawsuit. This includes medical records documenting the hernia mesh implantation, any subsequent treatments, and any complications that have arisen. Documentation of complications, such as medical reports and photographs, is crucial.

Proof of economic losses, such as medical bills and proof of lost wages from missed work due to hernia mesh complications, can also bolster your case. Finally, any communication or correspondence with the hernia mesh manufacturer or medical professionals about your complications can be powerful evidence.

While collecting and presenting evidence is crucial, it’s equally important to keep in mind the time limit for filing a lawsuit, known as the statute of limitations.

Ohio Statute of Limitation

In Ohio, the statute of limitations for hernia cases starts ticking two years from the date of the injury or from when the injury was or should have been discovered.

Related Articles:

See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered severe pain or injury from a defective medical device?

Get Your Free Consultation From Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawyers

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we stand by your side during challenging times. Should you or someone close to you suffer from complications related to hernia mesh, don’t hesitate to get in touch. Our seasoned legal team specializes in these intricate cases and offers step-by-step assistance throughout your legal journey.



Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.