At Schmidt & Clark, we are dedicated to helping individuals who have suffered due to defective hernia mesh products.
Our experienced legal team is here to guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve. Contact Schmidt & Clark today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Please click the button below for a Free Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Review or contact our lawyers toll-free 24 hrs/day for a free case evaluation by dialing (866) 588-0600.
Table Of Contents
- Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Overview
- Latest Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates
- FDA Reports and Statistics
- Ohio Hernia Mesh Injuries & Side Effects
- Do You Qualify for an Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?
- Ohio Hernia Mesh Recall Information
- Statute of Limitations for Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- FAQs
- 1. What evidence is crucial for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
- 2. What should I do if I suspect my injuries are related to a hernia mesh patch?
- 3. How do I choose the right lawyer for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
- 4. What is the average settlement amount for Ohio hernia mesh cases?
- 5. How long does a hernia mesh lawsuit take in Ohio?
- 6. What factors influence settlement amounts in Ohio hernia mesh cases?
- 7. Can I file a lawsuit if another firm declined my hernia mesh claim?
- 8. Which hernia mesh manufacturers are most commonly sued in Ohio?
- 9. What complications make me eligible for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
- 10. How does the MDL process affect my Ohio hernia mesh case?
- Get Your Free Consultation From Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawyers
Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Overview
Thousands of hernia mesh lawsuits are underway in Ohio as individuals seek justice for injuries following mesh implants.
Over 20,000 cases have been filed nationwide against major manufacturers including Atrium, Bard, Ethicon, and Covidien for severe complications caused by defective mesh devices.
Primary allegations focus on manufacturers marketing faulty products that cause life-threatening complications requiring revision surgery.
The FDA acknowledges that while surgical mesh can reduce hernia recurrence, some products have high failure rates causing severe complications [1].
Latest Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Updates
- June 2025 – Over 25,000 hernia mesh lawsuits remain pending across different Multidistrict Litigations (MDLs), with bellwether trials and settlement negotiations making significant progress in determining future resolutions [2].
- April 2024 – Another bellwether trial scheduled that could significantly influence settlement negotiations momentum, with status conferences planned for early 2024 to discuss global settlement or additional bellwether trials [3].
- Settlement Mediator Appointed – The appointment of a settlement mediator in the Bard hernia mesh MDL marked significant progression toward reaching global settlements for affected patients [4].
FDA Reports and Statistics
According to the FDA’s 2023 guidance, hernia mesh is designed to provide additional support to weakened or damaged tissue during hernia repair surgery [5].
However, when faulty, these devices can lead to severe complications requiring immediate medical intervention.
Key Litigation Statistics:
- 25,000+ lawsuits pending across multiple MDLs as of March 2024
- Nearly 400 new cases filed in November 2023 alone
- $4.8 million judgment awarded in Rhode Island against Bard subsidiary
- $500,000 award in Stinson Bellwether trial against Bard
- $70,000 average settlement in historical Kugel mesh litigation
Ohio Hernia Mesh Injuries & Side Effects
According to 2020 research by Science Direct, hernia mesh complications can manifest as life-threatening emergencies requiring immediate medical intervention [6].
These complications often necessitate revision surgery and can cause permanent damage.
Serious complications include:
- Infection: Localized or systemic infections potentially leading to sepsis
- Adhesion and Scarring: Chronic pain, discomfort, and mobility difficulties
- Mesh Erosion: Mesh breaks down and erodes through surrounding tissue
- Seromas: Fluid buildup requiring medical intervention
- Bowel Perforation: Puncture of intestinal walls causing blockages
Do You Qualify for an Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit?
You may qualify for an Ohio hernia mesh lawsuit if:
- You underwent hernia repair surgery in Ohio since January 1, 2006
- You experienced serious side effects including adherence, pain, fluid buildup, sepsis, bowel perforation, hernia recurrence, intestinal blockage, bleeding, fistula formation, infections, mesh rejection, organ puncture, mesh migration, bowel obstruction, or abscesses
- The injuries required medical treatment, hospitalization, or revision surgery
- You can provide medical documentation linking your injuries to the hernia mesh implant
Evidence Required for an Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuit
Essential documentation includes:
- Medical Records: Complete documentation of mesh implantation and subsequent treatments
- Complication Documentation: Medical reports and photographs of complications
- Economic Loss Proof: Medical bills and proof of lost wages from missed work
- Manufacturer Communication: Any correspondence with mesh manufacturer or medical professionals about complications
Damages You Can Recover
Ohio hernia mesh victims may receive:
- Medical Expenses: Current and future medical costs including revision surgeries
- Lost Wages: Compensation for income lost due to complications
- Pain and Suffering: Physical discomfort, emotional distress, and reduced quality of life
- Punitive Damages: Additional compensation for manufacturer misconduct
Studies have shown that surgical mesh can reduce the rate of hernia recurrence. However, some hernia mesh also has a high failure rate and can cause severe or even life-threatening complications. – National Library of Medicine
Ohio Hernia Mesh Recall Information
While not all defective hernia mesh products have been formally recalled, several manufacturers have faced significant legal scrutiny:
- Atrium: C-Qur mesh products subject to numerous lawsuits
- Bard: Multiple mesh models involved in extensive litigation
- Ethicon: Physiomesh and other products named in lawsuits
- Covidien: Various mesh devices subject to legal claims
- Gore Medical and Genzyme: Additional manufacturers involved in litigation
Statute of Limitations for Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
Two years from the date of injury or from when the injury was or should have been discovered to file a hernia mesh lawsuit.
Ohio’s statute of limitations is shorter than many states, making immediate legal consultation essential to preserve your rights.
FAQs
1. What evidence is crucial for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
Key evidence includes medical records, proof of hernia mesh implantation, documentation of complications and additional surgeries, and any communication with healthcare providers regarding your condition.
Seek immediate medical attention to document your injuries, and consult with a lawyer experienced in hernia mesh cases to discuss your legal options and ensure your rights are protected.
3. How do I choose the right lawyer for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
Look for a lawyer with experience in hernia mesh cases, a proven track record of successful settlements, and the resources to handle complex litigation. Ensure they offer a free consultation and work on a contingency fee basis.
4. What is the average settlement amount for Ohio hernia mesh cases?
Settlement amounts range from $60,000 to $1 million depending on case specifics, with historical Kugel mesh settlements averaging around $70,000 per claim.
5. How long does a hernia mesh lawsuit take in Ohio?
Cases can take several years depending on complexity, with MDL proceedings potentially expediting resolution through coordinated pretrial processes.
6. What factors influence settlement amounts in Ohio hernia mesh cases?
Primary factors include severity of injuries, economic impact (medical expenses and lost wages), and impact on quality of life including personal relationships.
7. Can I file a lawsuit if another firm declined my hernia mesh claim?
Yes, even if a potential claimant has had their hernia mesh claim declined by another firm, they may still be able to seek legal help with their case.
8. Which hernia mesh manufacturers are most commonly sued in Ohio?
Major manufacturers include Atrium, Bard, Ethicon, Covidien, Gore Medical, and Genzyme, with cases consolidated in federal MDL proceedings.
9. What complications make me eligible for a hernia mesh lawsuit?
Qualifying complications include adherence, chronic pain, fluid buildup, sepsis, bowel perforation, hernia recurrence, intestinal blockage, bleeding, infections, mesh rejection, and organ puncture.
10. How does the MDL process affect my Ohio hernia mesh case?
MDL consolidates similar cases for efficient pretrial proceedings, with bellwether trials helping gauge potential outcomes and settlement negotiations for thousands of related cases.
See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.
Get Your Free Consultation From Ohio Hernia Mesh Lawyers
At Schmidt & Clark, LLP, we stand by your side during challenging times. Should you or someone close to you suffer from complications related to hernia mesh in Ohio, don’t hesitate to get in touch.
Our seasoned legal team specializes in these intricate cases and offers step-by-step assistance throughout your legal journey.
References
- https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/implants-and-prosthetics/surgical-mesh-used-hernia-repair#What
- https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/how-much-compensation-can-you-expect-for-a-hernia-mesh-lawsuit.html
- https://www.millerandzois.com/products-liability/hernia-mesh-case-value/
- https://nighgoldenberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CMO-51-Bard-Hernia-Mesh-MDL-2846-Settlement-Scheduling-Order.pdf2.
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666138120300025