Molekule Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

Molekule Lawsuit Overview

A class action lawsuit alleges that Molekule Air Purifiers do not “destroy” germs or “eliminate” indoor air pollution as advertised, and cannot protect against airborne viruses like COVID-19, despite the manufacturer’s advertising claims.

The case, titled Paul Lepore v. Molekule Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York under case number 2:20-cv-02571.

Molekule Information

Molekule markets its air purifiers as using Photo Electrochemical Oxidation (PECO) technology, claiming the following capabilities:

• Highly Effective at Improving Indoor Air Quality: The company asserts its devices can completely eliminate indoor air pollution and germs.
• Capable of Destroying Large Quantities of Pollutants Quickly: Claims include destroying 3.4 million black mold spores in 50 minutes, 1 million allergens in 4 minutes, 3.4 million MS2 viruses in 2 minutes, and 3.7 million bacteria in 5 minutes.

However, the lawsuit alleges these claims misrepresent the product’s effectiveness, leading consumers to overpay for devices that don’t perform as advertised.

Latest Molekule Lawsuit 2025 Updates

• February 25, 2025 – Schmidt & Clark, LLP is no longer taking these cases and recommends contacting another law firm adequately suited to handle your case.
• 2023 – Molekule reached a $1.7 million class action settlement, providing cash payments and coupons to eligible consumers who had purchased specific Molekule air purifier models before October 12, 2021.
• 2021 – A separate lawsuit was filed in November 2021, arguing that Molekule’s air purifiers performed worse than traditional HEPA filters. Plaintiffs alleged that the company knowingly sold defective products while promoting them as superior air purification solutions.
• 2019 – The National Advertising Division (NAD) found that Molekule’s advertising lacked sufficient scientific support for its claims. Although Molekule agreed to modify its marketing language, the company allegedly continued to mislead consumers about the purifier’s effectiveness.

FDA Reports and Statistics 2025 Updates

While the FDA does not regulate air purifiers specifically, independent testing organizations have evaluated Molekule’s performance:

• Consumer Reports and Wirecutter testing found that Molekule air purifiers underperformed compared to standard HEPA filters [1].
• Wirecutter’s evaluation concluded that the Molekule Air “almost flunked” standard air purification tests.
• Independent lab studies, such as those conducted by Florida International University, showed that PECO technology effectively neutralizes allergen proteins, but other reviews questioned whether real-world performance matches marketing claims [2].

Molekule Injuries & Side Effects

While not physical injuries in the traditional sense, consumers have reported significant financial and health-related impacts:

• Financial Loss: Consumers paid premium prices (often $500-$1,000) for devices that allegedly don’t perform as advertised.
• Inadequate Health Protection: Reliance on devices that may not provide the promised reduction in allergens and asthma triggers.
• False Sense of Security: Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, consumers may have believed they were protected when they weren’t.
• Continued Exposure to Pollutants: Exposure to air pollutants that were supposed to be eliminated by the device.

Do You Qualify for a Molekule Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Molekule lawsuit if:

• You purchased a Molekule air purifier before October 12, 2021.
• You relied on advertising claims about PECO technology’s superior performance over HEPA filters.
• You would not have purchased the device or would have paid less had you known about its actual performance.
• You have proof of purchase (receipt, order confirmation, etc.)

Evidence Required for a Molekule Lawsuit

To strengthen your case, you should gather:

• Proof of purchase (receipts, credit card statements, emails).
• Product packaging and marketing materials that contain the disputed claims.
• Documentation of any communications with Molekule customer service.
• Any health-related documentation if you purchased the device for specific health concerns.

Damages You Can Recover

Compensation in a Molekule lawsuit may include:

• Refund of purchase price or partial refund
• Compensation for the difference between what you paid and the actual value
• Damages for false advertising
• In some cases, punitive damages may be awarded

Statute of Limitations for Molekule Lawsuits

The time to file a Molekule lawsuit varies by state, but typically ranges from 1-4 years from date of purchase or discovery of the deception. For specific details about your state’s statute of limitations, contact our attorneys immediately.

FAQs

Related Article: Dehumidifier Recall Suit

See all product liability lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Get Your Free Molekule Lawsuit Evaluation From Our Lawyers

Time is limited to pursue legal action for Molekule false advertising claims. Most states only allow 1-4 years from the date of purchase or discovery of the deception to file a claim.

Our services at Schmidt & Clark, LLP include:

• Free, confidential consultations
• No upfront costs or fees
• Payment only if we win your case

Don’t wait until it’s too late to seek the compensation you deserve for your losses related to Molekule’s allegedly deceptive marketing practices.

Reference:

1. https://www.consumerreports.org/appliances/air-purifiers/molekule-air-purifier-review-a6711172738/
2. https://www.livescience.com/best-air-purifiers-for-allergies