Published by If a Miocololy self-feeding pillow was involved in an aspiration, choking, or suffocation emergency, you may want a legal review of your options.
A case evaluation can help assess potential compensation for medical expenses and other documented losses connected to the event.
Table Of Contents
- What’s the Problem?
- Latest Updates
- Product Identification
- Units, Sales Window, and Price
- Remedy Status
- What Parents and Caregivers Should Do
- Do You Qualify for a Miocololy Self-Feeding Pillow Lawsuit?
- Liability Considerations
- Statute of Limitations
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Why Acting Promptly Matters
- References
What’s the Problem?
CPSC warns that these pillows hold a bottle at an unsafe angle while keeping it fixed in place. An infant may be unable to pull away, which can lead to aspiration of milk or formula and create a suffocation risk.
Design described in the warning includes a stuffed fabric pillow with an elastic sleeve that positions a bottle in front of an infant’s face. Arms or contours can keep the setup close to the infant, which increases risk when feeding is not actively supervised.
Latest Updates
- January 15, 2026 – CPSC issued Product Safety Warning No. 26-187 advising consumers to immediately stop using Miocololy self-feeding pillows due to an aspiration and suffocation hazard, covering about 2,380 units sold on Amazon. [1]
Product Identification
CPSC describes Miocololy self-feeding pillows as stuffed fabric pillows with an elastic sleeve intended to hold a bottle. Colorways listed include pink and gray, and other colors may have been available.
Sales were online through Amazon.com. Importation and sales were attributed to Miocololy-US, based in China, and manufacturing occurred in China.
Units, Sales Window, and Price
CPSC lists about 2,380 units. Online sales occurred from October 2024 through November 2025.
Price was listed between $15 and $25. Purchase records and order history can help confirm timing and product identity.
Remedy Status
CPSC states Miocololy-US has not agreed to recall these self-feeding pillows or offer a remedy to consumers. That means consumers are being directed to act without a repair, refund, or replacement program described in the warning.
Because no remedy is described, documentation becomes especially important if a safety incident occurred. Keep photos and order confirmation details if they are available.
What Parents and Caregivers Should Do
CPSC urges consumers to stop using the pillows immediately and dispose of them. Do not sell or give away these products.
Feeding should be active and closely supervised. Bottle propping can lead to choking or aspiration and can result in immediate serious injury or death.
Do You Qualify for a Miocololy Self-Feeding Pillow Lawsuit?
A legal review may be relevant if an infant experienced aspiration, choking, respiratory distress, or any suffocation-related emergency after use of a self-feeding pillow. Review may also be appropriate when medical evaluation occurred even if symptoms resolved quickly.
Case strength often depends on product identification, a clear timeline, and medical documentation. Saving packaging, photos, and order details can materially improve evaluation.
Evidence to Gather
- Photos of the pillow, elastic sleeve, and any labels or product identifiers
- Amazon order history, receipts, or transaction records
- Medical records, discharge paperwork, and follow-up notes
- A written timeline of feeding, symptoms, and treatment
- Any communications with the seller, platform, or regulators
Potential Damages
Potential damages may include emergency care costs, hospital bills, and follow-up medical treatment. Depending on the facts, damages may also include caregiver lost income and other documented out-of-pocket losses.
Non-economic damages may be available in some jurisdictions. Eligibility and categories of recovery depend on local law and the evidence available.
Liability Considerations
Child product injury cases are often evaluated under product liability and negligence theories. Analysis may focus on hazard foreseeability, product design, warnings, and marketing claims.
A CPSC warning does not automatically establish liability in an individual case. Evidence of exposure, injury, and damages still drives any claim evaluation.
Statute of Limitations
Deadlines vary by jurisdiction and may depend on the date of injury or discovery. Prompt review helps preserve evidence and avoid missed filing windows.
Medical records and product identification details can become harder to obtain over time. Early documentation usually improves claim review quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is there an official recall with refunds or replacements?
CPSC states the seller has not agreed to an acceptable recall or remedy. - What should I do if I still own one?
Stop using it immediately, dispose of it, and do not resell or give it away. - What if an incident happened but no hospital visit occurred?
A legal review may still be possible, but medical documentation typically strengthens a claim evaluation.
Why Acting Promptly Matters
Cases involving infant feeding hazards can turn on small details, including product configuration and timing. Photos and order history can disappear, so preserving records early can be important.
Medical documentation also matters for both treatment and claim evaluation. Seek medical advice promptly if symptoms occur.
References
- https://www.cpsc.gov/Warnings/2026/CPSC-Warns-Consumers-to-Immediately-Stop-Using-Miocololy-Self-Feeding-Pillows-Due-to-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death-from-Aspiration-and-Suffocation