If you or a loved one experienced injuries due to a Michelin tire failure, blowout, or tread separation, you may be entitled to pursue compensation through a product liability lawsuit.
At Schmidt & Clark, LLP, we are dedicated to helping individuals harmed by defective products. Our experienced legal team is here to guide you through the process and fight for the compensation you deserve.
Contact Schmidt & Clark today for a free, no-obligation consultation.
Click the button below for a Free Confidential Case Evaluation or call us toll-free 24/7 at (866) 588-0600.
Table Of Contents
- What’s the Problem?
- Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Tire Recall Overview
- Latest Recall Updates
- Which Tires Are Affected?
- Why the Recall Matters
- Steps Michelin Is Taking
- Do You Qualify for a Michelin Tire Recall Lawsuit?
- Evidence in a Tire Recall Lawsuit
- Statute of Limitations for Tire Recall Lawsuits
- Potential Compensation in a Michelin Tire Recall Lawsuit
- What Consumers Should Do Next
- Conclusion
- References
What’s the Problem?
The recall of Michelin Agilis CrossClimate C-Metric tires has raised serious concerns for drivers who rely on these products for safe travel in severe snow conditions.
The tires, which were advertised and marked with the Three Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) symbol, were found to underperform in critical snow traction tests, creating potential crash risks.
Individuals affected by this recall may be entitled to pursue compensation through a Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tire recall lawsuit.
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Tire Recall Overview
Michelin recently announced a recall of select Agilis CrossClimate C-Metric replacement tires after testing revealed that they did not meet the required snow traction standards.
These tires displayed the Alpine snowflake symbol, which is meant to assure drivers that they perform adequately in severe snow conditions.
However, because they failed to meet the necessary performance criteria, the tires could pose safety risks to drivers relying on them in winter weather.
Latest Recall Updates
The recall impacts tires manufactured between September 24, 2023, and April 26, 2025, at a Michelin-owned European production facility.
The company has already implemented warehouse blocks to prevent further distribution of the affected products. Additionally, Michelin has clarified that this recall only applies to C-Metric replacement tires and does not affect other CrossClimate product lines, such as the CrossClimate 2 passenger or SUV tires.
Which Tires Are Affected?
The specific tire sizes included in the recall are:
- 185/60R15C
- 195/75R16C
- 205/65R15C
- 205/75R16C
- 225/75R16C
- 235/65R16C
Because these tires are used on commercial and passenger vehicles that may travel through harsh winter conditions, the safety risks of reduced snow traction can be significant.
Why the Recall Matters
The central issue behind the recall is safety. When tires marked with the 3PMSF symbol fail to meet snow traction standards, drivers may falsely believe they are adequately protected in severe weather. Reduced traction increases the likelihood of skidding, losing control, and potential collisions, especially on snow-packed or icy roads. This creates legal liability concerns for Michelin and opens the door for potential lawsuits by consumers who experienced accidents or financial damages as a result of the defective tires.
Steps Michelin Is Taking
Michelin is offering tire exchanges for customers who purchased the affected models. Drivers can contact Michelin Consumer Care at 1-888-971-3801 for information on replacements. Additionally, consumers can reach out to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) via their Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 to check whether their tires are included in the recall.
Do You Qualify for a Michelin Tire Recall Lawsuit?
Drivers who purchased affected Agilis CrossClimate C-Metric tires and experienced safety issues, property damage, or accidents may qualify for legal claims. Even if no crash occurred, consumers may still have grounds to pursue financial recovery for:
- Replacement costs
- Vehicle damage caused by poor traction
- Medical bills from accidents
- Lost wages due to injury
- Pain and suffering related to tire failure incidents
Because this recall specifically involves a mislabeling issue—where the tires were marketed with a snow symbol that did not match their performance—there may also be grounds for claims under consumer protection and false advertising laws.
Evidence in a Tire Recall Lawsuit
To build a strong case, claimants should preserve the following types of evidence:
- Proof of tire purchase (receipts, invoices, or installation records)
- Photographs of the affected tires, especially showing the Alpine snowflake symbol
- Accident reports if an incident occurred
- Medical documentation of injuries
- Correspondence with Michelin or dealers regarding the recall
This documentation can help demonstrate how the defective tire directly contributed to financial and personal damages.
Statute of Limitations for Tire Recall Lawsuits
The timeline to file a tire recall lawsuit varies by state. Generally, product liability claims must be filed within two to four years from the date of the injury or discovery of the defect. For consumers impacted by the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate recall, it is important to act promptly to avoid missing legal deadlines that could bar recovery.
Potential Compensation in a Michelin Tire Recall Lawsuit
If successful, plaintiffs may recover damages for:
- Cost of tire replacement or refund
- Property damage repair expenses
- Medical expenses from related accidents
- Lost income and reduced earning capacity
- Pain and suffering damages
- In some cases, punitive damages to hold Michelin accountable
Compensation will depend on the severity of the losses suffered and the strength of the evidence presented in court.
What Consumers Should Do Next
Anyone who owns Michelin Agilis CrossClimate C-Metric tires should immediately check whether their tire size and production date fall under the recall notice.
If so, they should arrange for a replacement through Michelin or an authorized dealer. At the same time, affected individuals who experienced accidents, damages, or financial loss should consult with an experienced product liability attorney to evaluate whether a Michelin tire recall lawsuit is the best path forward.
Conclusion
The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate C-Metric tire recall highlights the importance of accurate safety labeling and performance testing in consumer products. When tires fail to perform as advertised, the consequences can be severe, ranging from financial losses to life-threatening accidents. If you or a loved one were impacted by these recalled tires, you may have legal options available to seek justice and compensation. Acting quickly can help protect your rights and ensure that responsible parties are held accountable.
References
1. https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/rcl/2023/RCAK-23T002-5200.pdf