The complaint was filed by Carol Moore against Walmart Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. Moore alleges that she was using the pressure cooker on or about July 4, 2024, when the lid suddenly came off and hot contents were forcefully ejected.
The lawsuit claims Moore suffered partial-thickness burns, required immediate medical care, underwent wound debridement and other procedures, and was left with permanent scarring. The case focuses on whether the pressure cooker’s lid-locking and pressure-release systems could allow the lid to open while pressure remained inside.
Consumers who suffered burns after a Farberware pressure cooker sold through Walmart opened, exploded, or released hot contents may want to preserve the appliance, lid, gasket, purchase records, photographs, medical records, and any communications about the product.
Quick Facts
- A 2026 lawsuit alleges that a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker sold through Walmart opened while pressurized.
- The plaintiff alleges partial-thickness burns, wound debridement, medical treatment, and permanent scarring.
- The complaint raises claims involving alleged design defect, failure to warn, negligence, and warranty issues.
- Pressure cooker burn claims often depend on preserving the appliance, lid, seals, model information, photos, and medical records.
Table Of Contents
- Latest News & Updates on Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuits
- What Is the Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker?
- Reported Risks or Injuries
- How Does the Problem Occur, and Who May Be Liable?
- Who May Be Affected?
- Do I Qualify?
- Do I Have a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
- Important Legal Actions or Recalls
- Potential Compensation
- Legal Process Overview
- Frequently Asked Questions About Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuits
- What is the Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Evaluation about?
- What does the Moore lawsuit allege?
- What injuries may support a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
- Is there a Farberware pressure cooker recall?
- What should I do with the pressure cooker after an incident?
- Can I bring a claim without the receipt?
- What evidence matters most in a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
- How soon should I request a legal review?
- References
Latest News & Updates on Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuits
June 2026
Carol Moore filed a product liability complaint against Walmart Inc. alleging that a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker opened or exploded while still pressurized, causing scalding contents to be ejected onto her body. The complaint alleges that the pressure cooker was defective and that Walmart failed to adequately warn consumers about the alleged risk [1].
May 2025
CPSC announced a recall of 1.8 million SharkNinja Foodi pressure cookers after reports that the pressure-cooking lid could open during use and allow hot contents to escape. Although that recall did not involve Farberware, it shows how regulators evaluate lid-opening hazards when hot food and liquid can be released under pressure [2].
Burn Injury Context
The Mayo Clinic notes that burns can damage skin and deeper tissue, and more serious burns may require medical care for pain, infection risk, scarring, and other complications. That medical context may be relevant in pressure cooker cases involving scalding liquids, steam, and food released with force [3].
What Is the Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker?
The lawsuit involves a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker allegedly sold through Walmart. Electric pressure cookers are designed to cook food quickly by trapping steam and pressure inside a sealed pot.
The complaint describes the product as a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker. In a legal review, model identification, purchase source, product labels, user manuals, and any serial or manufacturing information may help establish which unit was involved.
The central safety issue is whether a consumer could reasonably believe the appliance was safe to open while dangerous pressure remained inside. A pressure cooker may appear finished or inactive even though heat, steam, and pressure have not fully dissipated.
That hidden-pressure problem can make these cases fact-intensive. The lid, gasket, float valve, vent, pressure indicator, and locking mechanism may all need to be inspected before anyone can determine what happened.
Reported Risks or Injuries
The reported risk is sudden ejection of scalding food, liquid, and steam from a pressurized cooker. If the lid releases while pressure remains inside, the contents may strike the user before there is time to move away.
Moore alleges that she suffered partial-thickness burns and required immediate medical care. The complaint also alleges wound debridement, multiple medical procedures, and permanent scarring.
Pressure cooker burns may affect the chest, abdomen, arms, hands, face, neck, or legs depending on the user’s position and how the contents escaped. Injuries may include blistering, deep tissue damage, infection risk, nerve pain, skin discoloration, and long-term sensitivity.
Serious burns can disrupt more than the initial cooking incident. Dressing changes, scar care, limited movement, missed work, and emotional distress around cooking may all become part of the damages analysis.
How Does the Problem Occur, and Who May Be Liable?
The alleged problem occurs when a pressure cooker lid can be rotated, removed, or opened before internal pressure has safely released. Once the seal breaks, hot contents can erupt from the pot instead of venting gradually.
A Gourmia pressure cooker lawsuit involves similar lid-opening and burn-hazard allegations.
A legal investigation may focus on whether the lid-lock system, pressure indicator, gasket, float valve, venting components, or warnings failed to protect consumers from premature opening. The analysis may also consider whether the instructions clearly explained when the cooker was safe to open.
Potentially liable parties may include Walmart, product designers, manufacturers, distributors, component suppliers, or other entities involved in bringing the pressure cooker to market. The complaint names Walmart, but liability must still be proven through evidence.
Product inspection can be critical. Wear patterns, lid alignment, gasket condition, valve movement, residue, and damage to locking components may help explain whether the appliance failed or was unsafe during foreseeable use.
Who May Be Affected?
Consumers who used a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker sold through Walmart and suffered burns after the lid opened or hot contents escaped may be affected. A nearby family member or bystander may also be affected if they were struck by hot contents.
Incidents may occur during cooking, pressure release, lid removal, or shortly after the user believes the cooking cycle has ended. The timing of the release may help show whether the user had reason to believe the appliance was safe to open.
Anyone involved in a pressure cooker burn incident should preserve the appliance if possible. Cleaning, repairing, returning, or discarding the cooker can make later inspection more difficult.
Do I Qualify?
You may qualify for a legal review if you were burned by a Walmart Farberware pressure cooker that opened, exploded, or released hot contents while pressurized. The review will likely focus on the product model, purchase source, incident sequence, injury severity, and whether the appliance is still available.
Useful documentation may include:
- The pressure cooker, lid, gasket, inner pot, power cord, accessories, and any damaged parts
- Walmart receipts, online order records, credit card records, warranty documents, product photos, or user manuals
- Photos of the kitchen, appliance, spilled contents, burn injuries, clothing, and surrounding damage
- Emergency room records, burn-care records, wound debridement records, prescriptions, and follow-up treatment notes
- A written incident timeline describing what was cooked, what settings were used, and when the lid opened
Evidence should be gathered before the appliance is altered or thrown away. A product expert may need to inspect the pressure cooker, lid, venting system, gasket, and locking components.
Do I Have a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
If you or a loved one has been injured by a Walmart Farberware pressure cooker, you may have legal options. Contact Schmidt & Clark for a free case review.
Important Legal Actions or Recalls
| Event | Month/Year | Type | Status | Notes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moore v. Walmart Inc. complaint filed | June 2026 | Product liability lawsuit | Pending | Complaint alleges a Farberware 7-in-1 pressure cooker opened or exploded while pressurized | Complaint |
| Design defect and failure-to-warn allegations raised | June 2026 | Legal allegations | Alleged | Plaintiff alleges the cooker could be opened while pressure remained inside | Complaint |
| Reported burn injuries in Moore complaint | June 2026 | Injury allegations | Alleged | Complaint alleges partial-thickness burns, medical procedures, wound debridement, and permanent scarring | Complaint |
| Pressure cooker lid-opening hazard context | May 2025 | Consumer product recall | Recall announced | CPSC recalled SharkNinja pressure cookers after lid-opening burn hazards were reported | CPSC |
Potential Compensation
Potential compensation may include emergency care, burn treatment, wound debridement, surgical procedures, prescriptions, follow-up visits, scar treatment, and future medical care. Out-of-pocket treatment costs may also be part of a claim.
Additional damages may include lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, disfigurement, permanent scarring, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. The complaint in Moore’s case seeks damages for medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish, and diminished enjoyment of life.
Compensation amounts vary by case. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Legal Process Overview
Free case review: The review begins with the pressure cooker model, purchase source, incident timeline, injury photos, and medical treatment history. The goal is to determine whether the facts resemble known lid-lock or pressure-release allegations.
Product preservation: The pressure cooker should be kept in its post-incident condition if possible. The lid, gasket, valve, inner pot, cord, and accessories may all be relevant to an expert inspection.
Technical investigation: Attorneys may review product design, warnings, user instructions, failure reports, and safer alternative design evidence. Medical records are reviewed separately to document the injury and treatment course.
Filing: If the evidence supports a claim, a lawsuit may allege strict liability, negligence, failure to warn, breach of warranty, or other claims depending on the facts and state law. Filing deadlines vary by state.
Resolution: The case may resolve through settlement, court ruling, dismissal, or trial. The timeline depends on product evidence, expert analysis, injury severity, defendant response, and whether similar cases are pending.
Frequently Asked Questions About Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuits
What is the Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Evaluation about?
The Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Evaluation concerns potential claims by consumers who suffered burns after a Farberware pressure cooker allegedly opened, exploded, or released hot contents while pressurized. The Moore complaint alleges serious burn injuries involving a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker.
What does the Moore lawsuit allege?
The lawsuit alleges that the pressure cooker’s lid came off while the appliance remained pressurized, causing scalding contents to be ejected onto the plaintiff. The complaint also alleges design defect, failure to warn, negligence, and warranty-related claims against Walmart.
What injuries may support a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
A Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit may involve partial-thickness burns, second-degree burns, third-degree burns, scarring, wound debridement, surgery, infection, or other documented injuries. Medical records and injury photos can be important evidence.
Is there a Farberware pressure cooker recall?
This article is based on a lawsuit complaint, not a CPSC Farberware recall notice. A product does not have to be recalled for a person to request a legal review after an alleged defect-related injury.
What should I do with the pressure cooker after an incident?
Keep the pressure cooker, lid, gasket, inner pot, cord, and accessories if it is safe to do so. Do not clean, repair, return, or discard the appliance before getting legal guidance if you believe it may be evidence.
Can I bring a claim without the receipt?
A receipt helps, but it may not be the only way to show purchase or use. Walmart order history, credit card records, warranty documents, photos, manuals, product packaging, and witness statements may also help identify the product.
What evidence matters most in a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?
The appliance itself is often the most important evidence because experts may need to inspect the locking and pressure-release systems. Medical records, burn photos, purchase records, and a detailed timeline are also important.
How soon should I request a legal review?
You should request a review promptly after a serious pressure cooker burn. Filing deadlines vary, and early action can help preserve the product, medical records, witness information, and other evidence.
References
- https://www.schmidtandclark.com/wp-content/uploads/farberware-walmart-pressure-cooker-lawsuit-arkansas-1.pdf
- https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2025/SharkNinja-Recalls-1-8-Million-Foodi-Multi-Function-Pressure-Cookers-Due-to-Burn-Hazard-Serious-Burn-Injuries-Reported
- https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/burns/symptoms-causes/syc-20370539
Published by