Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Update: Injuries, Recall Status, and Legal Options

Moore filed the complaint against Walmart Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas in June 2026. The lawsuit asserts design-defect, failure-to-warn, negligence, and warranty-related claims, but its allegations have not been proven through a final judgment.

Consumers injured after a Farberware pressure cooker opened or released hot contents should preserve the appliance, lid, gasket, photographs, purchase records, and medical documentation. An individual review can determine whether the product, incident, injuries, and applicable law support a claim.

Quick Facts

• Carol Moore filed a product-liability complaint against Walmart Inc. on June 8, 2026.
• The lawsuit involves a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker allegedly sold through Walmart.
• Moore alleges partial-thickness burns, wound debridement, medical treatment, and permanent scarring.
• The complaint alleges defects involving the cooker’s lid-locking and pressure-release safety systems.

Latest Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Developments

June 2026

• June 8, 2026 – Carol Moore filed a complaint alleging that a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker opened or exploded while pressurized and released scalding contents onto her body. The complaint asserts strict-liability, negligence, failure-to-warn, and warranty-related claims against Walmart [1]
• June 8, 2026 – The federal docket identified the case as Moore v. WalMart, Inc., Case No. 5:26-cv-05131, in the Western District of Arkansas. The docket classifies the action as a personal-injury product-liability case and identifies Judge Timothy L. Brooks as the presiding judge [2]

May 2025

• May 1, 2025 – CPSC announced a separate recall of approximately 1.8 million SharkNinja Foodi pressure cookers because the pressure-cooking lid could open during use and allow hot contents to escape. That recall does not involve Farberware, but it provides regulatory context for pressure-cooker lid-opening and burn hazards [3]

What Is the Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker?

The lawsuit involves a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable electric pressure cooker allegedly sold through Walmart. Electric pressure cookers cook food by trapping steam inside a sealed pot and increasing internal pressure.

The complaint identifies the appliance as a Farberware 7-in-1 model but should be reviewed directly for all product-specific allegations. Labels, model information, packaging, manuals, receipts, and Walmart order records may help establish which cooker was involved in an incident.

A pressure cooker typically uses a gasket, lid-locking mechanism, pressure indicator, float valve, and steam-release components to contain and regulate pressure. These systems are intended to prevent the lid from being removed before the internal pressure has safely dissipated.

The central issue in Moore’s case is whether the cooker could appear safe to open while dangerous heat and pressure remained inside. The complaint’s allegations remain disputed and must be proven with evidence.

What Does the Moore Lawsuit Allege?

Moore alleges that she was using the pressure cooker on or about July 4, 2024, when its lid suddenly came off during ordinary use. According to the complaint, pressurized food, liquid, and steam were forcefully ejected onto her body.

The lawsuit alleges that the cooker was defective and unreasonably dangerous because its safety features did not prevent the lid from opening while pressure remained inside. It also contends that Walmart failed to provide adequate warnings about the alleged hazard.

The complaint asserts claims involving strict product liability, negligence, failure to warn, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty. Each claim remains an allegation rather than an established finding of liability.

Walmart may dispute the alleged defect, how the incident occurred, causation, damages, or its legal responsibility for the product. Those issues may be addressed through motions, discovery, expert analysis, settlement negotiations, or trial.

What Risks and Injuries Are Alleged?

The primary alleged risk is the sudden release of scalding food, liquid, and steam from a pressurized cooker. A user standing near the appliance may have little time to move away when the lid opens unexpectedly.

Moore alleges that she suffered partial-thickness burns and required immediate medical treatment. The complaint also describes wound debridement, additional medical procedures, pain, mental anguish, and permanent scarring.

Pressure-cooker burns may affect the hands, arms, chest, abdomen, face, neck, or legs depending on the user’s position. Potential complications can include infection, scarring, changes in skin color, limited movement, and persistent sensitivity.

Mayo Clinic explains that more serious burns can damage deeper layers of skin and may require specialized medical treatment. The severity of a burn depends on its depth, size, location, and resulting complications [4]

How Could a Pressure Cooker Open While Pressurized?

The alleged hazard may occur when a lid can be rotated, unlocked, or removed before the pressure inside the pot has fully released. Breaking the seal can allow steam and hot contents to erupt rather than vent gradually.

An investigation may examine the locking mechanism, lid alignment, gasket, float valve, pressure indicator, vent, control system, and other components. Investigators may also assess whether wear, residue, component movement, or damage affected the cooker’s operation.

Warnings and instructions may be relevant when determining whether users received clear information about pressure release and safe lid removal. A consumer may reasonably rely on indicators, completed-cycle signals, or other product features when deciding whether the lid can be opened.

Determining what caused a specific incident generally requires inspection of the appliance and its components. The occurrence of a burn does not by itself establish that the cooker was defective.

Was the Farberware Pressure Cooker Recalled?

The Moore article and lawsuit are based on an individual product-liability complaint rather than a cited CPSC recall involving the Farberware cooker. The absence of a recall citation does not determine whether the product was defective or whether a particular consumer has a valid claim.

A recall is a regulatory or voluntary corrective action that may involve identified models, hazards, incidents, and remedies. An individual lawsuit instead requires proof concerning the specific product, alleged defect, causation, injuries, and damages.

The separate SharkNinja recall discussed above should not be described as involving Walmart’s Farberware pressure cookers. It is included only as context showing how an alleged ability to open a pressure-cooking lid during use can create a scalding hazard.

Who May Be Affected?

Consumers may be affected if they used a Farberware 7-in-1 programmable pressure cooker sold through Walmart and suffered burns after its lid opened or hot contents escaped. A bystander may also be affected if released contents struck someone standing nearby.

Incidents may occur during cooking, pressure release, lid removal, or shortly after the user believes the cycle has ended. The timing of the lid movement and any pressure indicators may be important to the investigation.

A potential claim may be stronger when the cooker and its components have been preserved. Photographs, purchase records, medical documentation, witness accounts, and a detailed incident timeline may also help establish what occurred.

Owning a similar cooker does not automatically establish a claim. Eligibility depends on product identification, an alleged defect, causation, documented injury, applicable law, and filing deadlines.

Who May Be Liable?

The Moore complaint names Walmart Inc. as the defendant. Depending on the evidence and governing law, an investigation may also consider a manufacturer, designer, distributor, component supplier, or another entity in the product’s supply chain.

Potential liability may involve the cooker’s design, manufacture, warnings, instructions, warranties, testing, quality controls, or distribution. Each party’s conduct and connection to the product must be evaluated separately.

A claimant generally must show that a defective or legally inadequate condition caused the pressure cooker to release its contents and resulted in compensable injuries. Walmart and any other defendant may raise defenses concerning product use, alteration, maintenance, causation, or damages.

Do I Qualify?

• Did a Farberware pressure cooker sold through Walmart open or release hot contents while still pressurized?
• Did you suffer burns, scarring, medical expenses, lost income, or another documented injury?
• Do you still have the cooker, lid, gasket, inner pot, valve, cord, or other components?
• Do you have photographs, Walmart records, medical records, packaging, manuals, or witness information?

An individual legal review can determine whether the product identification, alleged defect, incident circumstances, medical evidence, potential defendants, and applicable deadlines support a claim.

What Evidence Should I Preserve?

Preserve the pressure cooker in its post-incident condition when it is safe to do so. Keep the lid, gasket, inner pot, float valve, steam-release components, power cord, accessories, packaging, and instructions together.

Do not clean, repair, test, return, or discard the appliance before obtaining case-specific guidance. Altering its condition may affect an engineer’s ability to determine how the alleged failure occurred.

Photograph the cooker, lid position, contents, surrounding area, clothing, burns, and any visible damage. Save Walmart order history, receipts, payment records, warranty materials, emails, and communications concerning the product.

Medical evidence may include emergency-room records, photographs, treatment notes, debridement records, prescriptions, scar evaluations, bills, and follow-up recommendations. A written timeline can help preserve details about the cooking cycle and lid release.

Do I Have a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one suffered burns after a Walmart Farberware pressure cooker opened or released hot contents, you may have legal options. Contact Schmidt & Clark for a free case review.

Start My Free Case Review

Important Legal Actions or Recalls

Potential Compensation

Potential compensation may include emergency care, burn treatment, wound debridement, surgery, prescriptions, follow-up visits, scar treatment, rehabilitation, and future medical expenses. Recoverable losses depend on the evidence and applicable law.

Other potential damages may include lost wages, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, disfigurement, permanent scarring, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. The Moore complaint seeks damages for several of these alleged losses.

Compensation amounts vary by case. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Legal Process Overview

Free case review: An initial review may examine the pressure cooker model, purchase source, incident timeline, injuries, medical treatment, and available product evidence.

Investigation. Attorneys may preserve the cooker, review medical records and warnings, identify potential defendants, inspect components, and consult qualified engineering or medical experts.

Filing. A lawsuit may be filed when the evidence and governing law support one or more claims. Applicable statutes of limitation differ by jurisdiction.

Discovery/negotiation: The parties may exchange documents, inspect the cooker, question witnesses, obtain expert opinions, and discuss a possible settlement.

Resolution: A case may conclude through settlement, dismissal, court ruling, or trial. No outcome or timeline can be guaranteed.

Frequently Asked Questions About Walmart Farberware Pressure Cookers

Do I Have a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?

A claim may warrant review if a Farberware pressure cooker opened or released hot contents while pressurized and caused documented burns or other injuries. Eligibility depends on product evidence, causation, damages, and applicable law.

What Evidence May Support a Walmart Farberware Pressure Cooker Lawsuit?

Helpful evidence may include the cooker, lid, gasket, inner pot, photographs, Walmart records, manuals, medical records, and witness information. Preserve the appliance without cleaning or repairing it.

What does Carol Moore’s lawsuit allege?

The complaint alleges that a Farberware 7-in-1 pressure cooker opened while pressurized and ejected scalding contents. Moore alleges partial-thickness burns, medical procedures, debridement, and permanent scarring.

Has the court found Walmart liable?

No. The complaint contains allegations that must be proven, and the available docket does not reflect a final judgment establishing liability.

Is this article based on a Farberware recall?

No. The page is based on Moore’s individual product-liability complaint rather than a cited Farberware recall notice.

What should I do with the cooker after an incident?

Keep the cooker and all components in their post-incident condition when safe. Do not clean, repair, return, test, or discard them before obtaining guidance about evidence preservation.

Can I seek review without a receipt?

Possibly. Walmart order history, payment statements, warranty records, photographs, packaging, manuals, and witness accounts may help identify the product and purchase source.

How long do I have to file a claim?

Filing deadlines vary by state, claim type, and incident date. A legal review can identify the deadlines that may apply to the specific circumstances.

References

1. https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/filings/DTI4GGZA/Moore_v_WalMart_Inc__arwdce-26-05131__0002.0.pdf
2. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/arkansas/arwdce/5%3A2026cv05131/77414
3. https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2025/SharkNinja-Recalls-1-8-Million-Foodi-Multi-Function-Pressure-Cookers-Due-to-Burn-Hazard-Serious-Burn-Injuries-Reported
4. https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/burns/symptoms-causes/syc-20370539