Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit Investigation

A federal lawsuit alleges that an Emeril Lagasse Pressure AirFryer Plus released scalding contents while the appliance was being used, causing severe burn injuries. The case involves product-liability allegations against Tristar Products Inc. and focuses on whether the pressure-cooking lid and safety features were defectively designed or inadequately warned about.

Schmidt & Clark attorney awards and recognitions
Table of contents
  1. Latest Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit Updates
  2. May 14, 2026: Tristar Files Reply and Motion to Amend
  3. May 5, 2026: Wade Opposes the Arbitration Motion
  4. April 21, 2026: Tristar Moves to Dismiss or Compel Arbitration
  5. March 31, 2026: Tristar Is Served
  6. March 5, 2026: Case Assigned to Judge Divine
  7. March 4, 2026: Wade Files Suit
  8. What Is a Scald Burn?
  9. Who May Be Affected?
  10. Reported Injuries or Damages
  11. Evidence to Preserve
  12. Filing Deadlines
  13. Frequently Asked Questions
  14. What Does the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit Allege?
  15. Which Court Is Hearing the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit?
  16. What Does the Research Say About Scald Burns?
  17. Is a Jury Trial Requested in the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit?
  18. References
The Emeril Lagasse Pressure AirFryer Plus, model Y6D-AF-36B, is named in a federal burn injury lawsuit. A Missouri woman alleges its pressure lid opened while the unit was still pressurized, scalding her. Suzette Wade sued Tristar Products, Inc. on March 4, 2026. She alleges severe burns to her face, chest, abdomen and arms. Tristar has asked the court to dismiss the case or compel arbitration. This is one individual case, and the court has not ruled on that request. No recall or MDL covers this model.
Lawsuit at a glance
  • Case or litigation name: Wade v. Tristar Products, Inc.
  • Defendants: Tristar Products, Inc.
  • Court and docket number, when available: U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, No. 4:26-cv-00316 (Judge Joshua M. Divine)
  • MDL number, judge, and case count, when an MDL exists: No MDL
  • Filing date: March 4, 2026
  • Main allegations: Alleged: the pressure lid opened while the unit was still pressurized, scalding the user; claims for strict product liability, failure to warn and negligence
  • Products or people involved: Emeril Lagasse Pressure AirFryer Plus, model Y6D-AF-36B; plaintiff Suzette Wade of Robertsville, Missouri

Latest Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit Updates

May 14, 2026: Tristar Files Reply and Motion to Amend

Tristar Products filed its reply on the motion to dismiss or compel arbitration, plus a motion to amend its memorandum. Judge Joshua M. Divine granted the amendment, per the court docket [1].

May 5, 2026: Wade Opposes the Arbitration Motion

Suzette Wade filed her response in opposition to Tristar’s motion to dismiss or compel arbitration. She attached her own declaration to the response.

April 21, 2026: Tristar Moves to Dismiss or Compel Arbitration

Tristar Products filed a motion asking the court to dismiss the case or compel arbitration. It filed a memorandum, a supporting declaration and an arbitration agreement exhibit with the motion.

March 31, 2026: Tristar Is Served

Tristar Products was served with the complaint on March 31, 2026, less than four weeks after Wade filed it on March 4, 2026. Its answer was due April 21, 2026.

March 5, 2026: Case Assigned to Judge Divine

The court assigned the case to U.S. District Judge Joshua M. Divine on March 5, 2026. The assignment came one day after Wade filed her complaint. The court’s case opening notification names Judge Divine as the assigned judge. The case number is 4:26-cv-00316 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

March 4, 2026: Wade Files Suit

Suzette Wade filed her complaint and jury demand against Tristar Products in federal court in Missouri. The filing opened the case. The complaint is docket entry 1 [2]. Wade is the plaintiff, and Tristar Products, Inc. is the only defendant named in the case.

What Is a Scald Burn?

MedlinePlus defines a burn as damage to your body’s tissues caused by heat, chemicals, electricity, sunlight, or radiation. It is a service of the National Library of Medicine [3]. The Wade complaint alleges that hot food and steam from a pressure air fryer erupted onto the user’s body after the pressure lid opened while the unit was pressurized.

Who May Be Affected?

You may be in a similar position if a pressure cooker or pressure air fryer lid opened while the appliance was still under pressure and hot food or steam burned you. Wade’s case involves the Emeril Lagasse Pressure AirFryer Plus, which the complaint says she used as intended on January 28, 2023 in Robertsville, Missouri. Whether you have a claim depends on your own facts and your own injuries, and only an individual legal review can answer that.
Think you may qualify?
Schmidt & Clark offers a free case review for people burned while using a pressure cooker or pressure air fryer. A review does not promise eligibility or any result. Start My Free Case Review

Reported Injuries or Damages

The complaint alleges severe and permanent burn injuries, including serious burns to the face, chest, abdomen and arms. It also alleges significant pain, medical expenses, mental anguish and permanent disfigurement. No court has made a finding on these allegations. The complaint seeks compensatory damages, plus costs, interest and other damages to be determined at trial. It brings claims for strict product liability, failure to warn and negligence. For other pressure cooker burn cases and how a review works, see our pressure cooker lawsuit page, which covers the wider litigation.

Evidence to Preserve

If a pressure appliance burned you, keep these items safe and do not repair or discard it:
  • The appliance itself, plus its box, manual and any packaging
  • The model number and serial number
  • The receipt, order confirmation or product registration
  • Photographs of your injuries over time, and of the lid and gasket
  • Medical and billing records
  • Names of anyone who saw the incident
  • Messages with the seller or Tristar

Filing Deadlines

Filing deadlines come from state law. They differ depending on where you live and when your injury happened, so check which rules apply to you. A late filing can end a claim, however good the facts look. Talk with a lawyer soon so you know which deadline applies in your case.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Does the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit Allege?

The Emeril Lagasse pressure air fryer lawsuit alleges the built-in safety features meant to lock the lid until pressure was released failed. It also alleges Tristar knew or should have known of the defect and the product did not meet the UL 136 standard.

Which Court Is Hearing the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit?

The Eastern District of Missouri is hearing the Emeril Lagasse pressure air fryer lawsuit. It is filed as a diversity product-liability action under 28 U.S.C. 1332, with the nature of suit listed as personal injury product liability.

What Does the Research Say About Scald Burns?

The research on scald burns from MedlinePlus says scalds from hot liquids and steam, building fires, and flammable liquids and gases are the most common causes of burns overall, according to the agency.

Is a Jury Trial Requested in the Emeril Lagasse Pressure Air Fryer Lawsuit?

The plaintiff demanded a jury trial in the Emeril Lagasse pressure air fryer lawsuit, and the docket lists the jury demand for the plaintiff. The request came with the complaint filed March 4, 2026, and no court has made a finding on the claims.

References

  1. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72364961/wade-v-tristar-products-inc/?order_by=desc
  2. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/72364961/wade-v-tristar-products-inc/?order_by=asc
  3. https://medlineplus.gov/burns.html