FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit Attorney

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has received thousands of adverse event reports associated with retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters like B. Braun’s Tempofilter II, which has been linked to adverse health complications including filter fracture, device migration, perforation of the lungs / heart, severe infections, nerve damage and death.
Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt
Free Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit Review
If you or a loved one has been harmed by Tempofilter II IVC filter complications, you should contact the attorneys at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, immediately.

You may be entitled to compensation by filing a Tempofilter II IVC Filter lawsuit and our lawyers can help. Please click the button below for a Free Confidential Case Evaluation or call us toll-free 24 hrs/day by dialing (866) 588-0600.

Start My Free Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit Case Review

What is the Tempofilter II?

Tempofilter II is a retrievable IVC filter that is designed to ensure effective caval filtration for up to 3 months. Unlike the original Tempofilter, the next-generation Tempofilter II features a tethering catheter, which does not require fixation barbs to ensure correct positioning.

Braun says the Tempofilter II offers minimal endothelialization for easy retrieval and a subcutaneous fixation device which ensures a minimal risk of infection at the puncture site.

What’s the Problem?

Despite its advantages, patients have still been injured after being implanted with the Tempofilter II. According to one report, a 62-year-old man who received the Tempofilter II had it removed three weeks after being implanted. Unfortunately, a filter leg broke and become embedded in the patient’s vena cava wall. The man was put on blood-thinning medications and discharged from the hospital without removing the broken filter leg.

Related Article: IVC Filter Litigation Update


An April 2013 study published in JAMA Internal Medicine [1] looked at complications associated with IVC filter placement in 952 patients. About 680 patients were implanted with retrievable vena cava filters, and only 58 were successfully removed. Doctors made 13 unsuccessful removal attempts, 11 of which occurred in patients whose filters had remained in place for over 85 days.

Of the 13 unsuccessful IVC filter removal attempts:

  • 8 patients couldn’t have their filters removed because they were embedded;
  • 3 patients couldn’t have their devices removed because the filters had punctured a blood vessel;
  • 2 patients’ filters had migrated to a position that wouldn’t allow for removal, and
  • 1 patient had a blood clot inside the filter.

In June 2015, a study published in the Journal of Vascular Interventional Radiology [2] found that the Cook Celect vena cava filter had a 43% rate of perforation compared to the Options filter made by Rex Medical, which had a 0% perforation rate. The researchers noted this was a “significantly higher rate” of perforation.

Another study published in the Annals of Surgery [3] in October 2015 found that patients who suffer traumatic injuries face a “life-threatening” risk for blood clots, but that IVC filters don’t provide a survival benefit. For the study, researchers looked at 803 patients who received an IVC filter after a traumatic event between 2010 and 2014.

They found that not only did the IVC filter recipients fail to receive a survival benefit, but they also suffered deep vein thrombosis (DVT) events at an increased rate. Trauma patients are being implanted with IVC filters at increasing rates despite a lack of proof that the devices help, the researchers concluded.


Who is Eligible to File a Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit?

Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuits can be filed by anyone who has suffered from the use of an IVC filter or the families of those who have suffered or died from the use of these devices. These lawsuits claim that the manufacturing companies and medical professionals applying faulty products had a debt of responsibility to warn the users of the dangers of these products.

But it will be important to act quickly as there is a time limit in which these lawsuits must be filed. This is called the “statute of limitations” and is different from state to state.

Related Articles:

See the other medical device lawsuits we’ve covered.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered severe pain or injury from a defective medical device?

Get a Free Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

The Medical Device Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Tempofilter II IVC filter lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new cases in all 50 states.

Free Confidential Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has had a Tempofilter II IVC filter implanted, you should contact our law firm immediately. Our lawyers are evaluating every individual case regardless of whether you have been injured or not. So, if you have received a Tempofilter II IVC filter implant, we would like to speak with you. You may be entitled to compensation for a settlement by filing a Tempofilter II IVC Filter Lawsuit against the manufacturer and our lawyers can help.

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.