FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Vermont Talcum (Baby) Powder Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Vermont residents grappling with health issues allegedly linked to talcum powder usage may find the evolving Vermont talcum powder lawsuit to be of critical importance.

Focused on the claims against Johnson & Johnson and others, this article explains the current lawsuit status, individual rights, potential compensation, and the health concerns prompting these legal battles.

If talcum powder has negatively impacted your health or that of a loved one, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is ready to assist. As a top-tier law firm specializing in plaintiff representation, our primary goal is to make sure you get the justice you deserve and the compensation you’re entitled to.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Overview

The pivotal ingredient at the heart of these talcum powder lawsuits is a naturally occurring mineral – talc. Talc, the primary component in Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, has been under scrutiny due to mounting evidence linking its use to serious health problems, such as ovarian cancer. Amid the sea of individual cases, a few key players have been consistently named in these lawsuits:

  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Imerys Talc America
  • Colgate-Palmolive
  • Valeant Pharmaceuticals

Johnson & Johnson, a multinational corporation known for its array of consumer goods, stands as the primary defendant. The company’s Johnson’s baby powder, one of its most recognized products, is at the forefront of these legal battles. Accusations of unethical conduct, including alleged attempts to suppress unfavorable findings, have further complicated the legal landscape.

What is Talc?

Talc is primarily made up of hydrated magnesium silicate. It is also referred to as Vermont talc and is a key ingredient in a variety of consumer goods. This mineral finds extensive use in a broad spectrum of consumer products, from cosmetics such as mascara and lipstick to personal care items like baby powder and cosmetic talc products [1].

The extraction and processing of talc involve mining from locations like Vermont, followed by milling to achieve varying particle sizes. The finest talc particles are often used in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and certain food items.

Active Ingredients Used in Talcum Powder Products

Active ingredients in talcum powder products primarily include talc and cornstarch. The inherent moisture-absorbing properties of talc make it a key component in these products. The presence of cornstarch, derived from a food substance, serves as an alternative to talc.

The products also incorporate a range of fragrances, from fresh baby powder to floral scents, to impart a pleasing aroma. The ongoing litigation seeks to hold Johnson & Johnson accountable for any potential health risks associated with their talcum powder products.

Identifying Key Players: Brands and Companies Named in Talcum Powder Lawsuits​​

The product primarily implicated in these lawsuits is Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder. Allegations revolve around the health risks associated with the talc baby powder that Johnson created.

The company’s approach to managing its asbestos-related liabilities has also drawn scrutiny. Johnson & Johnson established a new entity, LTL Management LLC, to transfer its asbestos liabilities, including claims related to mesothelioma and ovarian cancer.

Talcum Powder Litigation: An Overview of the Battle Against Johnson & Johnson

Currently, Johnson & Johnson is confronted with a multitude of lawsuits suggesting that its talcum powder could cause cancer. Efforts to resolve numerous lawsuits through bankruptcy have been thwarted, marking the second instance where J&J’s bankruptcy approach has been turned down.

Multidistrict litigation, a legal procedure that consolidates similar cases for simultaneous resolution, is playing a significant role in the talcum powder lawsuits due to the large number of similar claims against Johnson & Johnson.

Current State of Litigation in Vermont

In Vermont, the Supreme Court’s rejection of Johnson & Johnson’s appeal of a $2 billion penalty in a baby powder cancer case underscores the gravity of the issue and the judiciary’s willingness to enforce corporate responsibility.

Approximately 6,600 lawsuits have been filed by women who were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, asserting that talcum powder caused their condition. In one such case, evidence was presented indicating that prolonged use of Johnson & Johnson baby powder resulted in the development of the disease.

The Growing Number of Talcum Powder Lawsuits in Multidistrict Litigation

A notable escalation has been observed in the number of cases in MDL 2738, which consolidates federal lawsuits into a single case. In August 2023, the pending cases numbered 37,770. By September 2023, the figure rose to 47,346, and presently, there are 52,995 cases.

The consolidation of these cases under multidistrict litigation enhances the overall litigation efficiency by bringing together the interests of all the plaintiffs. While each claim maintains its individuality, the collective representation allows for a more efficient handling of cases and promotes consistent decisions.

Johnson & Johnson’s Bankruptcy Strategy and Litigation Complexities

Characterized as the ‘Texas Two-Step,’ Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy strategy involved the transferring of asbestos liabilities to a newly established subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, followed by filing for bankruptcy.

However, this move has been challenged, with rulings determining that only financially distressed companies can declare bankruptcy. As a result, Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy filed by LTL Management, LLC was dismissed, allowing for 38,000 pending lawsuits to proceed.

These developments have potential consequences for existing plaintiffs, who may face a considerable decrease in payout from the proposed $8.9 billion asbestos trust fund. There is also apprehension that the funds could be exhausted before numerous future plaintiffs have a chance to present their claims.

A link has been identified between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, as suggested by a Harvard epidemiologist who estimates that 10,000 American women develop ovarian cancer annually from using talcum powder for perineal dusting. This correlation highlights the potential health risks associated with talcum powder usage [2].

“In 1976, the Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrances Association (CTFA), the trade association representing the cosmetic and personal care products industry, issued voluntary guidelines stating that all talc used in cosmetic products in the United States should be free from detectable amounts of asbestos according to their standards.”- American Cancer Society

Johnson & Johnson’s testing revealed the presence of asbestos, including chrysotile and tremolite asbestos, in their talcum powder. Despite knowing this, they chose not to disclose this information publicly, leading to numerous lawsuits.

Does Talcum Powder Cause Mesothelioma?

Talcum powder does cause mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive form of cancer primarily attributed to asbestos exposure, a naturally occurring mineral [3].

The presence of asbestos in talcum powder can result in the development of mesothelioma and other asbestos-related cancers, potentially leading to asbestos contamination in affected areas.

This occurs when asbestos fibers from the talcum powder are inhaled and accumulate in the lungs and pleura, ultimately causing the onset of the disease.

Who Qualifies For a Vermont Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

Individuals who are within the statute of limitations, have a cancer diagnosis that can be linked to talcum powder use, and can demonstrate a history of frequent talcum powder usage qualify for a Vermont talcum powder lawsuit.

The use of talcum powder has been associated with conditions such as ovarian cancer, lung cancer, and asbestos-related diseases, which warrant legal action.

Damages That You Can Recover From a Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Courts have awarded compensatory and punitive damages to claimants in talcum powder lawsuits. The typical amount awarded for a talcum powder lawsuit settlement is estimated to be around $500,000 per plaintiff.

When calculating medical expenses in talcum powder lawsuits, certain factors are taken into account, such as:

  • current medical bills
  • potential future medical needs
  • lost earning capacity
  • lost quality of life

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Vermont

A variety of factors influence settlement amounts in Vermont talcum powder lawsuits, including:

  • Physical and financial damages
  • Incurred medical bills
  • Lost earning capacity
  • Severity of the disease
  • Evidence of negligence
  • The caliber of legal representation

The highest known settlement awarded in a Vermont talcum powder lawsuit, which involved Vermont mines, is $2.1 billion, reflecting the substantial compensation plaintiffs may receive.

Filing a Vermont Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Individuals must ascertain their eligibility to file a claim and comply with the state’s statute of limitations, ranging from one year to ten years, to initiate a talcum powder lawsuit in Vermont.

Significant evidence in a Vermont talcum powder lawsuit comprises documentation demonstrating the potential presence of asbestos in talc and its products, as well as research linking talc usage to ovarian cancer.

Types of Evidence Presented in Talcum Powder Lawsuits

In talcum powder lawsuits, medical records, including diagnosis details and pathology reports from biopsies, serve as evidence.

Internal company documents hold great significance as they can serve as evidence of a company’s awareness of asbestos risks in its talc products and its subsequent actions or lack thereof in addressing those risks.

Examining the Role of Expert Witnesses in Talcum Powder Litigation

In talcum powder lawsuits, expert witnesses play a pivotal role, presenting scientific evidence and opinions vital for establishing a causal connection between talcum powder use and health issues, such as ovarian cancer.

They also help the court understand the scientific and medical aspects of talcum powder use and its potential health hazards. Their input is essential for presenting evidence, substantiating claims, and influencing the litigation’s outcome.

Vermont Statue of Limitation

As specified by law, the time limit for initiating product liability lawsuits in Vermont is two years following the accrual of the cause of action.

There are exceptions to this rule. Talcum powder lawsuits must be commenced within six years after the cause of action accrues, except in the case of fraud. There is no statute of limitations for injuries arising out of medical or surgical treatment or operation.

Related Articles:

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been unreasonably injured by a dangerous or defective consumer product?

Get Your Free Consultation From Vermont Talcum Powder Lawyers

If you or a loved one has suffered from injuries related to talcum powder exposure, Schmidt & Clark, LLP is ready to provide the assistance you need. We specialize in handling such cases and are committed to guiding you every step of the way.

Understanding your legal rights and determining your eligibility for a lawsuit is crucial. We offer free consultations, and our services are charged only when we successfully resolve your case.

Reach out to Schmidt & Clark today for a comprehensive review of your case. Allow us to be your trusted partner in navigating this challenging situation.



Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.