FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Pennsylvania Talcum (Baby) Powder Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

With the rising number of lawsuits related to talcum powder and its alleged cancer risks, understanding the landscape of this litigation is becoming increasingly important.

Thousands of cases have been filed, accusing manufacturers of talcum-based products of failing to provide adequate warnings about the associated risks. In Pennsylvania, these lawsuits are particularly prevalent.

If you or a loved one has suffered due to the use of talcum powder, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is ready to assist. Renowned for our expertise in representing plaintiffs, our foremost dedication is to secure the justice and rightful compensation you deserve.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Overview

Talcum powder lawsuits have garnered significant attention in the legal field. These lawsuits revolve around the alleged connection between talcum powder, particularly products like baby powder, and cancer diagnoses.

An increasing number of lawsuits accuse manufacturers of failing to adequately inform consumers about the potential health risks associated with talc.

Johnson & Johnson, a key player in this litigation, has chosen to discontinue the use of talcum powder in its products, transitioning to cornstarch-based products. Despite these changes, plaintiffs allege that the company was aware of the potential risks but chose not to inform consumers.

What is Talc?

Talc is a mineral that’s been used in a variety of consumer products [1]. Its most well-known use is in talcum powder, which has been linked to cancer.

Understanding talc and its uses is essential, given that talcum powder cancer cases primarily hinge on manufacturers’ knowledge of potential hazards and their failure to warn consumers adequately.

Active Ingredients Used in Talcum Powder Products

Talcum powder products contain several active ingredients, the most notable of which is talc. However, the health hazards associated with talc-containing products have been a significant concern in recent years.

Talcum powder claims have been made that manufacturers have not sufficiently informed users about the potential health risks, such as ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, and have also failed to test their talc products for asbestos contamination adequately.

As a result, Johnson & Johnson now faces more than 10,000 baby powder lawsuits in Pennsylvania alone, with additional lawsuits targeting other manufacturers of talc products.

As of December 15, 2023, there are 53,729 pending talc cancer lawsuits consolidated into multidistrict litigation, indicating a substantial increase in the number of cases over time.

Identifying Key Players: Brands and Companies Named in Talcum Powder Lawsuits​​

In response to legal proceedings and ongoing debate, Johnson & Johnson has decided to discontinue the sale of its talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in the U.S. and Canada.

It plans to remove all talcum powder products from the global market by 2023, replacing talc with cornstarch. But Johnson & Johnson isn’t the only company facing legal scrutiny. Other providers of talcum powder and prominent retailers such as:

  • Target
  • Walmart
  • CVS
  • Walgreens

Several companies have also been involved in legal proceedings concerning their talcum powder products, with some facing a talcum powder case and numerous talcum powder lawsuits filed.

Talcum Powder Litigation: An Overview of the Battle Against Johnson & Johnson

The legal battle against Johnson & Johnson has been a notable part of the ongoing talcum powder litigation. Numerous lawsuits have been filed against the company, resulting in settlements and jury verdicts totaling billions of dollars awarded to plaintiffs.

In a noteworthy development, 53 women who developed ovarian cancer after using Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products are seeking a motion to remand their cases back to Pennsylvania for trial.

Amidst these proceedings, the company has attempted a controversial bankruptcy scheme, which has resulted in a temporary hold on most lawsuits against them, delaying proceedings for nearly two years to address the bankruptcy of LTL Management, LLC.

Current State of Litigation in Pennsylvania

The current state of litigation in Pennsylvania paints a sobering picture of the toll that talcum powder has taken on those who have used these products. Federal judges have accelerated the proceedings of the talcum powder ovarian cancer cases, setting six bellwether cases back on the trial track in the federal court system.

Amid these proceedings, Johnson & Johnson has encountered obstacles in their bankruptcy filing endeavors, with the U.S. appeals court dismissing their initial two attempts.

The company has also made a significant proposal, offering a $9 billion settlement, underscoring its continuous endeavors to address the numerous lawsuits they are confronting in Pennsylvania.

As it stands, there are more than 10,000 lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson in Pennsylvania, and there are also additional lawsuits targeting other manufacturers of talc products.

The Growing Number of Talcum Powder Lawsuits in Multidistrict Litigation

The number of talcum powder lawsuits consolidated into multidistrict litigation has been growing rapidly. Multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal process in which numerous similar cases are combined and brought before a single court for pre-trial procedures.

This increase in talcum powder lawsuits is mainly attributed to allegations that the usage of talc powder, particularly baby powder, has been linked to ovarian cancer.

Some notable cases in the talcum powder multidistrict litigation include the Johnson & Johnson talc powder cancer lawsuit settlement, which reportedly offered a prominent settlement of $9 billion, in addition to numerous lawsuits filed by individuals alleging the development of ovarian cancer or mesothelioma following the use of baby powder.

Johnson & Johnson’s Bankruptcy Strategy and Litigation Complexities

Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy strategy, often referred to as JJ’s strategy, has been a hot topic in the talcum powder litigation. The strategy includes the creation of a subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, to segregate its liabilities, specifically those associated with talcum powder litigation.

This approach enables the company to pursue bankruptcy protection for the subsidiary, potentially minimizing the financial repercussions of the talcum powder cancer lawsuits on the parent company.

However, Johnson & Johnson’s bankruptcy strategy has not gone as smoothly as planned. With a series of jury trials set for 2024, the company feels compelled to resolve the baby powder asbestos lawsuits.

As a result, it has made multiple attempts to offer significant settlements, such as the notable offer to pay a minimum of $8.9 billion to resolve thousands of these lawsuits.

As of July 2022, Johnson & Johnson is contending with nearly 38,000 cases related to asbestos in its talc products, presenting a substantial legal challenge for the company.

The talc-based powder has long been associated with ovarian cancer. Over 20 long-term studies have indicated a 20%-40% increased risk of developing ovarian cancer after prolonged use of talcum powder.

A study conducted by Dr. Cramer revealed a significant 92% increase in the risk of women who reported using talc in their genital region to develop ovarian cancer [2].

“Multiple studies of ovarian cancer and genital talc use have led only to consensus about possible carcinogenicity.”- Daniel W. Cramer, MD, ScD, Heat of The Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center

Does Talcum Powder Cause Mesothelioma?

Talcum powder does cause mesothelioma. This assertion is based on numerous scientific studies and legal cases that have found a direct link between the use of talcum powder and the development of mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer that primarily affects the lining of the lungs and abdomen [3].

Over time, these trapped fibers can cause inflammation and scarring, leading to the development of mesothelioma.

Who Qualifies For a Pennsylvania Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

Individuals who have used talc-based products and received a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, or another asbestos-related illness qualify for a Pennsylvania talcum powder lawsuit.

Besides meeting usage and diagnosis criteria, it’s also critical for the plaintiff to secure an accurate diagnosis from a licensed healthcare professional.

This diagnosis holds significant importance as it serves as evidence linking the cause of the health issue to the talc-containing product(s) used during the discovery phase of litigation.

Damages That You Can Recover From a Talcum Powder Lawsuit

In a successful talcum powder lawsuit, various types of damages may be awarded. Compensatory damages in a talcum powder lawsuit are intended to provide compensation to the plaintiff for incurred losses, which may encompass actual and punitive damages.

Actual damages may include compensation for medical expenses, financial losses, and suffering resulting from cancer development due to asbestos-contaminated talc products.

Punitive damages are financial reparation granted to reprimand the defendant for their wrongful behavior or lack of care. They are commonly granted in conjunction with compensatory damages in talcum powder lawsuits.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Pennsylvania

Settlement amounts for talcum powder lawsuits in Pennsylvania can vary greatly based on the specifics of each case. Factors that influence the amount of settlement include:

  • The seriousness of the illness.
  • Proof of negligence.
  • The quality of legal representation.

The typical payout for a Johnson & Johnson baby powder lawsuit is a minimum of $100,000. However, settlements and court decisions can reach into the multi-millions or even billions for collective claimants. The largest settlement amount ever awarded in a talcum powder lawsuit in Pennsylvania is $10 million.

Filing a Pennsylvania Talcum Powder Lawsuit

If you or a loved one are believed to be eligible for a talcum powder lawsuit, understanding the process of filing such a lawsuit in Pennsylvania is crucial. This includes understanding the types of evidence presented, the role of expert witnesses, and the state’s statute of limitations.

To initiate a talcum powder lawsuit, it’s necessary to:

  1. Confirm eligibility to file a claim.
  2. Assess the applicability of the statute of limitations.
  3. Ensure compliance with all pertinent criteria for pursuing legal recourse.

Types of Evidence Presented in Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Evidence holds a pivotal role in talcum powder lawsuits. This typically includes product usage documentation, such as receipts or records of purchase, which can support a plaintiff’s testimony regarding the extended use of talcum powder products.

In addition to documentation of product usage, medical documentation is also key in establishing a diagnosis of illnesses associated with such usage, such as ovarian cancer. When combined, these documents serve as fundamental evidence in illustrating a connection between the plaintiff’s condition and their talcum powder usage.

Examining the Role of Expert Witnesses in Talcum Powder Litigation

Expert witnesses are vital in talcum powder lawsuits. These individuals are deemed qualified based on their experience, knowledge, training, skill, or education about the relevant issue. They typically possess expertise in areas such as:

  • Epidemiology
  • Toxicology
  • Pathology
  • Oncology

Expert witnesses offer scientific and technical expertise. Their presentation of evidence and testimony either supports or challenges claims concerning the safety and potential risks associated with talcum powder use. Their testimonies can significantly influence the outcome of the case.

Pennsylvania Statue of Limitation

The statute of limitations for filing a talcum powder lawsuit in Pennsylvania is two years from the date of the injury. However, the discovery rule permits the tolling of a statute of limitation until the plaintiff becomes conscious of their injury or reasonably should have become conscious of their injury.

Related Articles:

See all related product liability lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been unreasonably injured by a dangerous or defective consumer product?

Get Your Free Case Evaluation From Pennsylvania Talcum Powder Lawyers

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we’re committed to standing by your side during challenging times. If you or a loved one has suffered due to exposure to talcum powder, reach out to us without delay. Our experienced team is well-versed in handling such cases and will provide comprehensive guidance throughout the process.

You must be fully aware of your legal rights and determine your eligibility for a lawsuit. Rest assured, our consultations are always complimentary, and you won’t incur any fees unless we secure a favorable result for your case.

Get in touch with Schmidt & Clark today for an in-depth review of your case. Allow us to be your trusted partner in navigating this complex situation.



Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.