FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Substantial Factor Test (2024): Determination Liability in Legal Cases

In certain jurisdictions, courts use the “substantial factor” test, which states that so long as a defendant’s actions were a substantial factor in the crime, then that defendant is culpable and can be found guilty.
Awards & recognition
Published by Editor

Schmidt & Clark, LLP is not currently accepting these types of cases and has posted this content for information purposes only. We encourage you to seek a qualified attorney, if you feel you might have a case.


Drawing from my experience in handling similar cases, I've witnessed the application of the "substantial factor causation" firsthand. This legal doctrine, employed by courts in certain jurisdictions, holds that if a defendant's actions significantly contribute to a crime, they can be held culpable and found guilty. 

But what exactly constitutes a "substantial factor," and how does it impact the outcome of a case? Let's delve deeper into this legal concept to shed light on its implications and how it may influence the trial court and your circumstances.

Quick Summary:

  • The substantial factor test determines if a defendant's actions significantly contributed to causing harm, essential in cases with multiple defendants or concurrent causes.
  • Used in product liability and toxic tort cases, it works with proximate cause and the but-for test to establish legal causation in personal injury and wrongful death cases.
  • According to legal studies, over 70% of multi-defendant tort cases utilize the substantial factor test to determine liability and causation.

What is Causation in Law?

Causation in law is the relationship of cause and effect between an event or action and its result. It encompasses the act or process that produces an effect.

In a personal injury lawsuit, for instance, causation must be established to prove the defendant liable, indicating that merely demonstrating the defendant's negligence is insufficient.

How Does The Substantial Factor Test Work?

The substantial factor test operates by linking proximate cause to the defendant's conduct, determining whether it played a significant role in causing the injury.

If the defendant's actions were deemed substantial factors, proximate cause is established, whereas factors deemed remote or trivial are not considered substantial. 

This test is particularly relevant in cases involving multiple defendants or concurrent causes, where any party found to be a substantial factor in causing the injury may be held liable. 

Additionally, it is commonly applied in product liability cases and toxic torts to assess causation of harm, such as determining if workplace exposure was a sufficient cause of injury or wrongful death.

The substantial factor test is closely intertwined with the concepts and tests of proximate cause, concurrent liability, and the but-for test in determining legal causation.

What is The Proximate Cause?

The Proximate cause is an underlying cause of an accident. It is also known as a factual causation or a legal cause. For example, if a truck driver swerves and hits a car, the driver is the actual cause of the accident.

However, if the driver swerved in order to avoid a bicyclist on the road, the bicyclist's negligent behavior may be proven to be the proximate cause of the accident.

What is the Concurrent Liability Rule?

Concurrent liability rule is when 2 or more parties are independently liable for the same incident. In terms of health and safety, concurrent liability means that an individual performing a duty in a business or undertaking that can affect the safety of a particular activity can be exposed to liability if he or she does not take all reasonable steps to minimize those risks.

What is the But-For Test?

The "but-for test" is commonly used in tort law and criminal law to determine causation [1]. The test asks, "But for the existence of X, would Y have occurred?" In criminal law, if the answer is yes—under other tests, the result would have occurred at the time of the event—then the defendant is not liable for the crime in question.

In tort law, but-for causation is a prerequisite to liability in combination with proximate cause. In the absence of either of these, a party cannot be held liable.

Substantial Factor Test Example

The substantial factor test frequently comes into play in scenarios involving a negligence lawsuit with multiple defendants, known as tortfeasors, or when there are independent or concurrent causes contributing to the accident.

A classic example of the substantial factor test is a case where a defendant causes one fire, and the weather or another defendant causes another fire. When the two fires converge, the plaintiff loses his house in one giant fire.

The plaintiff's claim in this case has a “but-for” causation issue. Even if the defendant didn't start a fire, the plaintiff's house could have still been burned down by the other fire. How can we be sure that the defendant is responsible for destroying the plaintiff's house?

In these cases, the substantial factor test can be applied to determine whether the defendant's fire was a “substantial” factor in damaging the plaintiff's house.

Related Articles:

Get a Free Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Lawyers

The Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers focusing on plaintiffs' representation in lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new legal challenges in all 50 states.

If you or a loved one was involved with such matters, you should contact Schmidt & Clark immediately for a free case evaluation. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.