Pennsylvania Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Attorney

Pressure cookers have become a popular kitchen appliance for their convenience and efficiency. Still, their widespread use has also led to a surge in pressure cooker lawsuits due to explosions causing severe injuries.

In this article, we will delve into the details of specific incidents in Pennsylvania, discuss the pressure cooker brands involved in these Pennsylvania pressure cooker lawsuit cases, and explore the legal options available to those affected.

If you or someone you care about has been injured due to a pressure cooker accident, the committed team at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is ready to support you.

As a law firm with national recognition specializing in representing plaintiffs, our foremost objective is to ensure you receive the justice you deserve and the rightful compensation you are owed.

Pennsylvania Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits

Pennsylvania has experienced an upsurge in pressure cooker lawsuits recently, most of which involve severe injuries from exploding devices.

These incidents often result in substantial burn injuries due to the scalding hot contents being forcefully ejected from the pressure cooker. One such case involved an Instant Pot pressure cooker, a popular brand among consumers.

Numerous lawsuits have targeted the electric pressure cookers, as plaintiffs allege the devices contain dangerous defects. In many cases, the pressure cooker’s lid can be removed while the pot is still under pressure, leading to disastrous consequences.

Instant Brands, the manufacturer of Instant Pot, has faced several lawsuits due to these incidents, with plaintiffs asserting that the company failed to provide adequate safety features and warnings to prevent such accidents.

Explosions from pressure cookers can inflict life-altering injuries, often causing victims to sustain serious burns on multiple body parts. In some cases, these injuries can be so severe that they require extensive medical treatment and lead to permanent scarring or disfigurement.

Consumers must be aware of the potential risks associated with these devices, given the increasing number of pressure cooker lawsuits in Pennsylvania.

The Incident in Pennsylvania

One particular incident in Pennsylvania involved a woman and her two-year-old daughter who sustained severe burns from scalding hot food expelled from an Instant Pot pressure cooker.

The device still contained a hazardous amount of pressure at the time of the explosion, causing the hot contents to eject from the pot forcefully.

“With so many pressure cooker recalls and so many lawsuits, these appliances have shown that they can be extremely dangerous if faulty.”- Consumer Notice.org

The mother sustained second-degree burns on her hands, arms, and chest, which resulted in permanent scarring. Her daughter suffered third-degree burns on her face, chest, neck, left shoulder, and left arm – serious burn injuries that will have a lasting impact on her life.

This tragic incident highlights the risks associated with using pressure cookers and the importance of proper safety precautions.

Which Pressure Cooker Brands Are Named in The Lawsuits?

Pressure Cooker brands that are named in the lawsuits include Instant Pot, the Power Pressure Cooker, and Power Pressure Cooker XL. These include the SilverOnyx Pressure Cooker, Cooks by JCPenney, and the Tristar Power Pressure Cooker, which have all faced legal action due to incidents involving exploding pressure cookers and resulting injuries.

Consumers must understand the potential risks of using pressure cookers, particularly the brands implicated in lawsuits.

By staying informed, individuals can make educated decisions about the products they use in their homes and take the necessary precautions to minimize the risk of accidents.

Other Pressure Cooker Brands Facing Litigation

Several other brands also face litigation across the United States, indicating that pressure cooker lawsuits are not confined to Pennsylvania. Some of these brands include:

• Conair Corporation, which has been involved in lawsuits in Connecticut
• Zavor, which has been involved in lawsuits in Florida
• Tristar Products, which has been involved in lawsuits in Arkansas

These lawsuits often involve allegations of dangerously defective products, inadequate safety features, and false representation of product safety. Consumers should research their brands and stay updated on any potential safety concerns or associated legal actions.

Plaintiff Claims in Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuit

In pressure cooker injury lawsuits, plaintiffs often claim that the devices are dangerously defective due to design flaws and inadequate safety features. They argue that the pressure cooker’s lid can be removed while the pot is still under pressure, leading to explosions and severe injuries.

Another common claim is that the pressure cooker manufacturers failed to warn consumers about the potential risks associated with their products and did not provide adequate safety precautions.

Understanding the assertions made in these lawsuits enables consumers to make knowledgeable decisions about the pressure cookers they use and implement measures to lessen accident probabilities.

Common Pressure Cooker Injury

Pressure cooker explosions can result in various types of injuries, with burns and scalds being the most common [1]. These injuries can be caused by steam, contact with hot surfaces, or splashed/spilled hot liquid, all of which can occur during a pressure cooker explosion.

Defective pressure cookers, such as a defective pressure cooker with safety mechanisms that fail to function as intended, can lead to dangerous situations where a pressure cooker explodes.

This underscores the necessity of vigilance when using pressure cookers and comprehending the potential risks they pose.

Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Pennsylvania

Pressure cooker lawsuit settlement amounts in Pennsylvania can vary greatly depending on the specifics of each case. Factors affecting compensation include the nature and severity of the physical injuries sustained, the amount of medical expenses incurred, and the impact of the injuries on the plaintiff’s life.

Typical settlement amounts in pressure cooker lawsuits in Pennsylvania range from $125,000 to $200,000 for second-degree burns and $600,000 to $2,000,000 for third-degree burns.

These figures demonstrate the potential financial impact of these injuries on affected individuals and their families.

There are instances where the settlement amounts can surpass these ranges. For instance, Instant Brands settled a pressure cooker lawsuit with the mother of an injured child, and the company was ordered to pay $6,225 in legal fees to the family.

This underscores the need to seek legal aid when pursuing compensation for injuries caused by defective pressure cookers.

District Court vs. Circuit Court

Understanding the differences between District Court and Circuit Court is crucial when filing a pressure cooker lawsuit in Pennsylvania. District Court, also known as Magisterial District Court, is a trial court that deals with minor criminal offenses, traffic violations, and civil cases involving small claims [2].

Circuit Court, on the other hand, is a higher-level court that serves as the initial level of appeal for cases determined in trial courts and reviews decisions made by the District Court.

Filing a lawsuit in a Pennsylvania District Court may offer advantages such as:

• Access to local resources and support
• Convenience for plaintiffs residing in Pennsylvania
• Familiarity with local laws
• Potential for a more expeditious resolution

However, it is essential to consult with a lawyer to determine the best course of action for your specific case.

Filing a Pennsylvania Pressure Cooker Lawsuit

Suppose a pressure cooker explosion has injured you or a loved one. In that case, you must take the necessary steps to file a lawsuit in Pennsylvania. To begin, arrange a no-cost case evaluation with a law firm that specializes in product liability cases. They will guide the process and assess whether you have a legitimate claim.

When preparing for your lawsuit, you should compile any relevant evidence, including medical records and incident documentation. The statute of limitations for filing a product liability lawsuit in Pennsylvania is two years, so it is crucial to act promptly.

Seeking advice from a lawyer experienced in product liability cases can help you fulfill all the requirements to file a pressure cooker lawsuit in Pennsylvania. They can guide you through the process, from filing the initial complaint to providing supporting documents such as medical records, witness statements, and other relevant evidence.

FAQs

What should I do immediately after being injured by a pressure cooker in Pennsylvania?
Seek medical attention immediately for your injuries. Document the incident by taking photographs of your injuries and the damaged pressure cooker, and retain the cooker and any related materials, such as the instruction manual.

How can I prove that a pressure cooker defect caused my injury?
Collect evidence such as medical records, photographs of the injuries and the pressure cooker, proof of purchase, and any communication with the manufacturer. Expert testimony may also be required to establish the link between the defect and your injury.

Can I still file a lawsuit if I no longer have the pressure cooker?
While having the pressure cooker can strengthen your case, you can still file a lawsuit without it. Documenting your injuries and retaining any related materials or photographs can support your claim.

Related Articles:

• Oregon Pressure Cooker Lawsuit
• Ohio Pressure Cooker Attorney
• Oklahoma Pressure Cooker Lawsuit

See all related personal injury lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Get Your Free Case Evaluation From Pennsylvania Pressure Cooker Lawyers

If you or a loved one has suffered injuries because a pressure cooker exploded, Schmidt and Clark, LLP are here to provide the legal support you need. Our team has extensive experience in handling cases like these. It is committed to guiding you through each stage of the process.

You are entitled to understand your legal rights and explore the possibility of filing a lawsuit. We assure you that our consultations are always free of charge, and you will not be asked to pay any fees unless we win your case.

Don’t hesitate to get in touch with Schmidt and Clark for a detailed evaluation of your case. Allow us to stand by your side in this journey.

Reference:

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33655192/
2. https://pennsylvaniacourtrecords.us/magisterial-district-court/