FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Illinois Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

With the ever-growing popularity of pressure cookers, the unfortunate reality of pressure cooker-related injuries and lawsuits has also emerged. In Illinois, these incidents have led to serious injuries, raising the need for consumer awareness and legal action.

In this article, we delve into the world of Illinois pressure cooker lawsuits, shedding light on the truth and seeking justice for those affected by pressure cooker injuries, lawsuits, and settlements in the state.

Pressure cookers have become a popular kitchen appliance, but their use in Illinois has come with a dark side—severe injuries caused by defective pressure cookers. Reports of burns, lacerations, traumatic brain injuries, and other serious conditions have led to a growing number of lawsuits against pressure cooker manufacturers in the state.

Illinois Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuits

Pressure cookers have been around since the 17th century, but recent years have seen a surge in accidents involving these devices, including exploding pressure cookers.

Modern electric pressure cookers boast digital controls and a variety of cooking functions, but they can be subject to several defects, leading to an explosive release of pressure. These explosions often result in severe injuries, such as burns, scarring, and lacerations.

A prevalent concern raised in pressure cooker lawsuits is the risk of the cooker opening while under pressure. The malfunction of safety mechanisms has led to a significant increase in severe burns and injuries resulting from exploding pressure cooker incidents and other pressure cooker explosions, including cases where a pressure cooker exploded.

Hundreds of individuals have initiated pressure cooker lawsuits, including those involved in a pressure cooker explosion lawsuit, seeking justice and compensation for their suffering.

Details of the Incident

One such incident in Illinois involved a plaintiff who sustained burn injuries when the contents of a Presto pressure cooker were forcefully expelled onto her. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against IC Marks Inc. and QVC Inc., claiming:

  • negligence
  • breach of express warranty
  • failure to warn
  • strict liability
  • loss of consortium

The lawsuit alleged that the pressure cooker malfunctioned due to the failure of its safety mechanisms. The incident occurred due to the defendant’s failure to redesign the pressure cooker despite the availability of safer alternative designs.

In another case, Bridget Iovino sustained second and third-degree burns as a result of an exploding Elite Bistro pressure cooker. Iovino and her husband directed their lawsuit against Kohl’s and Maxi-Matic USA Inc., claiming that the pressure cooker’s safety mechanisms were faulty and that the defendants were responsible for her injuries.

These incidents demonstrate the catastrophic consequences of instant pot pressure cooker explosions and the need for legal action to hold manufacturers accountable.

Which Pressure Cooker Brands Are Named in The Lawsuits?

Pressure cooker brands that are named in the lawsuits include Crock-Pot, Instant Pot, and Ninja Cooker. These instant pot pressure cookers were advertised as having safety features designed to keep the lid securely closed until the pressure had been properly released. However, defects in these safety features have led to accidents and injuries, prompting victims to seek legal action.

In the Samantha Gonzalez case, the Vasconia pressure cooker’s pressure valve activated inadvertently, and there was a problem with the locking system of the older models. In other lawsuits, plaintiffs claim that manufacturers failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks associated with their pressure cookers, making misleading statements about the safety features.

Plaintiff Claims in Pressure Cooker Injury Lawsuit

In a typical defective pressure cooker lawsuit, the plaintiff asserts claims of negligence and product liability against the manufacturer or product seller. Allegations include:

  • Severe burns caused by boiling liquid ejected from the pressure cooker
  • Faulty components resulting in pressure cooker explosions
  • Claims of the defendant’s knowledge of defects in the pressure cooker

In seeking justice and compensation, the plaintiff’s legal team works to establish the liability of the manufacturer for any injuries sustained. This includes proving design errors, manufacturing mistakes, and failure to warn or provide adequate instructions. By pursuing these claims, plaintiffs hope to hold manufacturers accountable for their negligence and the suffering caused by their defective pressure cookers.

Common Pressure Cooker Injury

Injuries associated with pressure cooker accidents are usually severe and life-altering. Some of the most common injuries sustained include burns, scarring, and lacerations [1]. These injuries often result from defective safety mechanisms or inferior materials used in the manufacturing process.

In case of an injury resulting from a pressure cooker explosion, immediate medical attention is imperative. Proper medical care can help in the recovery process and provide necessary documentation for any potential legal action. Preserving evidence like remnants of the pressure cooker, photographs, and witness accounts is equally important to bolster your claim.

Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Settlement Amounts in Illinois

The settlement amount in pressure cooker lawsuits is calculated based on the severity of the damages incurred, such as physical injuries, emotional distress, and material losses. Generally, settlements are intended to provide financial compensation for those affected by the incident. This compensation may include medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.

The average settlement amount for second-degree burns ranges from $125,000 to $200,000. Third-degree burns may result in settlements up to $2,000,000. In one notable case, a California couple obtained a settlement in a pressure cooker lawsuit against Maxi-Matic USA and Kohl’s Department Stores after the wife suffered substantial burn injuries.

Consumers who purchased a Tristar Power Pressure Cooker between March 1, 2013, and January 19, 2018, could have potential claims as part of a proposed class action lawsuit settlement with Tristar Products, Inc. Eligible claimants may be eligible for compensation.

“The Pressure Cooker suffers from a design defect that poses an unreasonable risk of injury during normal use.”- The United States District Court

Filing an Illinois Pressure Cooker Lawsuit

If a defective pressure cooker in Illinois has injured you, consulting a proficient personal injury attorney to evaluate your claim, gather relevant evidence, and advise on the best legal action becomes imperative. Submitting your claim promptly is crucial, given the statute of limitations for filing a product liability claim in Illinois is two years for personal injury and five years for property damage.

Your attorney will guide you through the civil litigation process, which requires meticulous attention to detail and may be daunting for those without significant legal knowledge. Pursuing a pressure cooker lawsuit opens opportunities for seeking compensation for your injuries and holding the manufacturer accountable for their negligence.

Product Liability

Product liability is a legal principle that holds manufacturers accountable for any harm caused by defective products. In Illinois product liability cases, negligence refers to the failure of a manufacturer or product seller to exercise due care, resulting in the harm caused by a defective product, such as design errors, manufacturing mistakes, and failure to warn or provide adequate instructions [2].

Pressure cooker manufacturers must ensure their products meet certain minimum safety standards. They can be held accountable for any flaws in the pressure cooker if it can be demonstrated that the flaw caused damage. Pursuing a product liability claim allows you to seek compensation for your injuries and hold the manufacturer responsible for their negligence.

Negligence

Manufacturers and retailers have a legal responsibility to ensure that the pressure cookers they design, manufacture, and sell meet certain safety standards and are free from defects. They must take steps to protect consumers from harm and can be held accountable if their products cause any injuries or damages. Typical examples of negligence in pressure cooker injury cases include:

  • Intentional concealment of defects
  • Failure to warn consumers
  • Negligent manufacturing processes
  • Negligent design
  • Failure to conduct proper testing
  • Negligent marketing practices

Establishing negligence in a pressure cooker lawsuit enables you to seek compensation for your injuries while holding the manufacturer and retailer accountable for their actions.

Related Articles:

See all related product liability lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been unreasonably injured by a dangerous or defective consumer product?

Get Your Free Case Evaluation From Illinois Pressure Cooker Lawyers

Schmidt and Clark, LLP stand by your side during critical moments. If you or a family member has suffered from injuries from a faulty pressure cooker, feel free to reach out to us. Our team is experienced in handling such cases and is prepared to assist you at every stage.

You have the right to comprehend your legal rights and assess your potential eligibility for a lawsuit. Be assured that our consultations are always free, and you won’t bear any costs unless we secure a favorable outcome for your case. Our commitment is to serve you with the same care and dedication that we would offer to our own loved ones.

Contact Schmidt and Clark today for a thorough evaluation of your case. Allow us to be your trusted companion on this journey.

Reference:

  1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7746041/
  2. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/product_liability#:~:text=Product%20liability%20is%20a%20doctrine,of%20their%20intent%20or%20knowledge.

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.