FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Maryland NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit Attorney

Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

Navigating the intricate realm of baby formula and associated health risks is daunting for any parent. Being informed is the first line of defense. Recent Maryland NEC baby formula lawsuits have put a spotlight on this issue, and understanding these is paramount.

This article sheds light on the intricacies surrounding NEC baby formula lawsuits, potential avenues for compensation, and how to identify the right Maryland baby formula lawyer.

With Schmidt & Clark, LLP, you are in capable hands. Renowned for our expertise in medical-related lawsuits and backed by years of securing justice for affected families.

NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits

When it comes to NEC baby formula lawsuits, the primary focus is on baby formula manufacturers, such as Abbott Laboratories and Mead Johnson, who produce popular infant formulas like Similac and Enfamil. These lawsuits allege that certain baby formula products, particularly cow milk-based formulas, have caused premature infants to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a severe, life-threatening disease of the gut [1].

The main issue is that these companies failed to warn consumers about the risks associated with their products, particularly for premature infants.

Enfamil and Similac are the top-selling infant formula brands, and their cow milk-based formulas have been linked to NEC in premature babies. While the NEC infant formula litigation is still in the early stages, the American Academy of Pediatrics now recommends that parents avoid infant formula for newborns and that hospitals should promote human breast milk instead [2]. This recommendation comes as a result of the increasing number of NEC baby formula lawsuits filed against baby formula companies.

In these lawsuits, parents claim that their babies, especially premature infants, developed NEC as a direct result of being fed certain baby formulas. In response, Mead Johnson and Abbott Laboratories argue that NEC occurs naturally and could happen to premature or full-term infants, regardless of whether they are breastfed or fed with infant formula products.

However, parents continue to take legal action against these manufacturers for not providing adequate information about the potential risks associated with their products, leading to toxic baby formula lawsuits.

Should your child be affected by NEC due to baby formula, reaching out to seasoned nec formula lawyers, such as NEC baby formula lawyers, for legal guidance is advisable. Frost Law Firm, for example, has a wealth of experience in NEC claims nationwide and has secured millions of dollars in damages for clients.

Enfamil NEC Lawsuits

Enfamil, produced by Mead Johnson, is facing lawsuits for its alleged connection to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature babies. Parents seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering caused by their child’s development of NEC after consuming Enfamil baby formula. These lawsuits claim that Mead Johnson failed to adequately warn consumers about the risk of NEC associated with their product.

For children who developed NEC after drinking Enfamil or Similac, seeking advice from a baby formula lawyer is important to navigate the legal process and advocate for your rights. Compensation amounts for these lawsuits can vary, but families could be eligible to receive compensation for medical costs, pain, and suffering.

Similac NEC Lawsuits

Similarly, Similac, manufactured by Abbott Laboratories, is also under scrutiny for its potential link to NEC in premature infants. Parents are filing lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories, seeking damages and compensation for their child’s suffering due to NEC caused by Similac baby formula.

Should you suspect that your child developed NEC from consuming baby formula like Similac, discussing your situation with an NEC baby formula lawyer is recommended for further information and guidance. They can help you understand your legal options and provide support throughout the process.

Maryland Statute of Limitations for NEC Lawsuits

In Maryland, the statute of limitations for filing a baby formula lawsuit varies depending on the specific case. Product liability cases, including baby formula lawsuits, can range from two to ten years. For wrongful death lawsuits, the statute is two years from the date of the incident.

Awareness of these time limits is pivotal, and talking to an NEC baby formula lawyer is suggested to ensure the timely filing of your claim.

Finding a Baby Formula Lawyer in Maryland

When facing the heart-wrenching repercussions of NEC due to baby formula products, families in Maryland often find themselves in dire need of specialized legal support. Schmidt & Clark, with its commendable legacy in handling such cases, offers unwavering assistance. We are devoted to assisting families in Maryland, ensuring they receive the justice and compensation they rightfully deserve.

Finding the appropriate legal representation can be streamlined by visiting the Schmidt & Clark website or reaching out to our dedicated team directly. Our firm not only specializes in baby formula lawsuits but also has a deep-rooted understanding of Maryland’s legal landscape.

Through our commitment, we navigate the intricate process of filing a lawsuit in the state, from complaint submission to either a courtroom trial or out-of-court settlement, always prioritizing the best interests of our clients.

Collaborating with Schmidt & Clark in Maryland can unlock several advantages:

  • Expert Legal Counsel and Representation: With an adept team at your side, you’re fortified with the right advice tailored to your specific situation.
  • Paperwork & Legal Procedures: We take care of the comprehensive documentation and ensure timely filings, simplifying the process for families.
  • Continuous Guidance: Our team remains available, offering step-by-step guidance, and ensuring clients always know the path forward.
  • Rights & Entitlements: Beyond just representation, we work diligently to make sure clients are fully aware of their rights and potential compensations.

To further address common concerns:

  • Cost Considerations: At Schmidt & Clark, we predominantly operate on a contingency fee basis. This means families only bear a cost if compensation is successfully secured.
  • Eligibility Criteria: Generally, parents or guardians of affected infants have the standing to file a lawsuit. However, our team can offer clarity on specific eligibility nuances.
  • Timeline to File: Maryland has its distinct statute of limitations for baby formula lawsuits. Early consultation with Schmidt & Clark ensures that you’re operating within this crucial timeframe, safeguarding your rights.

Related Articles:

See all related food poisoning lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered food poisoning from consuming contaminated food or beverages?

Get Your Free Consultation From Baby Formula Lawyers

Engaging in a complimentary consultation with a baby formula lawyer from Schmidt & Clark, LLP can offer clarity in these tumultuous times for Maryland families. This initial, no-strings-attached meeting provides insights, addressing both the emotional and legal concerns surrounding your potential lawsuit.

Our professionals stand ready to decode your legal standing, advise you with utmost sincerity, and tenaciously advocate for your rights. Being proactive and informed is vital in the ever-evolving domain of Maryland baby formula lawsuits.

With the dedicated guidance of Schmidt & Clark, families can navigate this complex legal maze with confidence, ensuring their child’s rights are zealously protected. If NEC from baby formula has impacted your family, consider reaching out to Schmidt & Clark. Their commitment lies in facilitating justice, healing, and appropriate compensation for the harm done to your loved ones.


  1. Neu, J., & Walker, W. A. (2011). Necrotizing enterocolitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(3), 255-264.
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2012). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 129(3), e827-e841.

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.