FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Kansas NEC Baby Formula Lawsuit Attorney

Awards & recognition
Collen Clark Published by Collen Clark

A surging tide of legal action is targeting baby formula giants, notably Enfamil and Similac, amid claims their products may trigger the severe condition, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), in premature infants.

Today we’re here to unveil the intricacies of NEC baby formula lawsuits in Kansas, guiding you through the pivotal legal nuances and offering insights on securing representation from a trusted Kansas baby formula lawyer.

At the forefront of championing the rights of affected families is Schmidt & Clark, LLP. As a law firm recognized nationally for our advocacy, we are steadfastly dedicated to ensuring victims secure the justice and compensation they are rightfully due.

NEC Baby Formula Lawsuits

The connection between baby formula and NEC is alarming. Research has shown that premature babies fed cow-based baby formula, such as Similac, have an increased risk of NEC compared to those fed breast milk [1]. NEC baby formula lawsuits involve claims against makers of Enfamil and Similac for allegedly causing necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature babies.

The baby formula products in question are made and marketed by Mead Johnson Nutrition Company (Enfamil) and Abbott Laboratories (Similac).

Premature infants are at a higher risk of developing NEC when fed cow’s milk-based formulas, as their immature digestive systems have difficulty processing cow’s milk proteins [2]. This can lead to a bacterial infection and severe inflammation in the baby’s intestinal wall, resulting in necrotizing enterocolitis. The condition can be life-threatening and requires immediate medical attention, often in a neonatal intensive care unit.

Human breast milk is a safer alternative for these infants, as it is easier for their delicate systems to digest.

Enfamil and Similac, two of the most popular baby formula brands, have been at the center of these NEC lawsuits. The lawsuits allege that the manufacturers failed to warn consumers about the potential risks of using their cow’s milk-based formulas, specifically the cow milk-based formula products for premature infants.

Affected families are seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages caused by NEC.

These lawsuits aim to hold negligent companies accountable and raise awareness of the risks associated with formula-feeding premature babies. But, what exactly are the differences between the lawsuits against Enfamil and Similac? Let’s find out.

Enfamil NEC Lawsuits

Enfamil nec baby formula lawsuit primarily focuses on the manufacturer’s failure to inform consumers about the heightened risk of NEC in premature babies consuming cow milk-based formula. Legal action has been taken against Mead Johnson Nutrition Company, the producer of Enfamil baby formula. Parents claim that the formula caused their premature infants to suffer from necrotizing enterocolitis, a serious gastrointestinal infection.

The ongoing Enfamil NEC baby formula lawsuit’s current status remains uncertain. However, the potential outcomes of these lawsuits could include financial compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and other damages for affected families.

For more information on Enfamil NEC lawsuits, consider consulting diverse sources like legal websites and news media. Staying informed about the ongoing legal battle can help you better understand the situation and make informed decisions about your own potential case.

Similac NEC Lawsuits

Similac NEC lawsuits refer to legal cases against Abbott Laboratories, the producer of Similac baby formula. Similar to the Enfamil cases, these lawsuits allege that the manufacturer failed to properly alert consumers about the higher risk of NEC in premature babies who are fed cow milk-based formula.

If a Similac NEC lawsuit involving baby formula products is successful, the outcome could include financial compensation for medical bills, pain and suffering, and other damages. This compensation can help families cover the costs of caring for a child who has suffered from NEC due to the consumption of cow milk-based formula.

It’s vital to find a qualified lawyer for your Similac NEC lawsuit, given the varying statute of limitations and legal requirements for claim filing. To better understand how to find the right representation in Kansas, let’s delve into the statute of limitations for NEC lawsuits in the state.

Kansas Statute of Limitations for NEC Lawsuits

The statute of limitations for filing a baby formula lawsuit in Kansas can vary, but product liability cases usually have an average of 2 years [3]. This means that you have two years from the date of the injury or when you found out about it to file an infant formula NEC lawsuit. However, wrongful death cases may have different timeframes, depending on the situation.

It’s important to comprehend your specific case’s statute of limitations, as it sets the claim filing time window. Now that we know the legal timeframes, let’s discuss how to find a suitable baby formula lawyer in Kansas.

Finding a Baby Formula Lawyer in Kansas

In your quest to find a reliable baby formula lawyer in Kansas, it’s paramount to prioritize those who have solid experience in handling NEC lawsuits, especially those associated with formula-fed infants. Schmidt & Clark stands as a reputable firm with an established track record in navigating the intricate legal maze of premature infant formula NEC lawsuits.

Connecting with Schmidt & Clark, whether through their website or a direct call, can offer invaluable insights into your potential case. They bring to the table not just legal advice but comprehensive representation, ensuring you’re well-prepared to file a lawsuit against baby formula manufacturers.

It’s natural to have concerns about the financial aspects of legal representation. At Schmidt & Clark, they understand these apprehensions. Hiring a baby formula lawyer in Kansas, especially from a firm as esteemed as Schmidt & Clark, often means leveraging contingency-based fees. This implies you’re not required to pay upfront, and fees are deducted from any compensation you receive. This arrangement ensures that everyone, regardless of their financial situation, can seek justice.

As for eligibility, anyone who believes their child suffered due to a baby formula can file a lawsuit. It’s crucial to act promptly since there are statutes of limitations in place. In Kansas, it’s typically two years from when the injury was discovered. However, it’s always advisable to consult with your lawyer about specific timeframes, as they can provide clarity based on the specifics of your case.

Understanding the path to legal recourse is just the beginning. Availing a free consultation from Schmidt & Clark can help you gauge the strengths and potential challenges of your case, ensuring you’re making informed decisions every step of the way.

Related Articles:

See all related food poisoning lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one suffered food poisoning from consuming contaminated food or beverages?

Get Your Free Consultation From Baby Formula Lawyers

Taking the first step towards understanding your legal standing in NEC baby formula cases can be challenging. At Schmidt & Clark, LLP our team specializes in these cases and is committed to guiding families with transparency and compassion.

When you reach out for a complimentary consultation, our attorneys provide you with the opportunity to discuss your unique situation, assess the potential of your claim, and gain invaluable advice on charting the path ahead.

If your family has been affected by NEC due to the consumption of certain baby formulas, remember that timely legal action can make a significant difference. The intricate landscape of these lawsuits demands the guidance of experienced professionals.

Let Schmidt & Clark be the support system you lean on to seek the justice and compensation your family rightly deserves. Don’t wait—consult with us today and ensure you’re making informed decisions for your child’s future.

References:

  1. Sullivan, S., Schanler, R. J., Kim, J. H., Patel, A. L., Trawöger, R., Kiechl-Kohlendorfer, U., … & Blanco, C. L. (2010). An exclusively human milk-based diet is associated with a lower rate of necrotizing enterocolitis than a diet of human milk and bovine milk-based products. The Journal of pediatrics, 156(4), 562-567.
  2. Neu, J., & Walker, W. A. (2011). Necrotizing enterocolitis. New England Journal of Medicine, 364(3), 255-264.
  3. Kansas Statute. (n.d.). Product liability.

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.