Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Overview

Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuits allege that chronic exposure to chemicals in the product disrupts the hormone system and leads to an increased risk for uterine cancer and other serious health conditions. These lawsuits claim manufacturers failed to warn consumers about potential health risks associated with their products. 

The legal actions are part of a larger multidistrict litigation against multiple hair relaxer manufacturers.

Latest Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Updates

February 27, 2025 – The Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuits are currently in the discovery phase, where evidence is being gathered to support claims against the manufacturers. Lawyers have filed motions to compel companies to release internal documents about the dangers of their products.

October 2022 – A groundbreaking study published by the Journal of the National Cancer Institute uncovered a troubling connection between chemical hair relaxers and uterine cancer. The research found that frequent use of hair straightening products may more than double a woman’s risk of developing uterine cancer [1].

2017 – Timika Smith, an Illinois woman who used Just For Me Hair Relaxer for nearly three decades, was diagnosed with uterine cancer and endometriosis. She filed a lawsuit (Civil Action 1:22-cv-6047) in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against L’Oréal USA, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson LLC, and others.

“This action arises out of Timika Smith’s diagnosis of uterine cancer and endometriosis,” the complaint states. “Ms. Smith’s uterine cancer and endometriosis was directly and proximately caused by her regular and prolonged exposure to phthalates and other endocrine disrupting chemicals found in Defendants’ hair care products.”

2022 – Jennifer Mitchell, a 32-year-old Missouri woman who began using chemical hair straighteners at eight years old, was diagnosed with uterine cancer despite having no family history of the disease [2]. She filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against L’Oréal and other hair relaxer manufacturers.

“Not being able to carry my own children has been the hardest thing that I’ve ever had to deal with. This is a dream of mine that I’ve always wanted.”- Jennifer Mitchell

FDA Reports and Statistics

A study by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) tracked 33,947 women between the ages of 35 and 74 over 11 years as part of the NIH’s Sister Study. Key findings revealed that women who used hair relaxers more than four times per year had more than double the risk of developing uterine cancer compared to non-users. The study found that Black women are disproportionately affected due to higher usage rates.

Related Article: Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Update

Just For Me Hair Relaxer Injuries & Side Effects

Just For Me Hair Relaxer has been linked to several serious health conditions through recent medical research.

• Uterine Cancer: Hair relaxer chemicals have been linked to increased risk of uterine cancer
• Breast Cancer: Studies have connected chemical exposure from hair relaxers to breast cancer development
• Endometriosis: Disruption of hormone systems can lead to endometriosis
• Uterine Fibroids: Hair relaxer chemicals may contribute to the development of uterine fibroids
• Scalp Burns: Direct application can cause burns and lesions, increasing chemical absorption
• Hair Loss: Extended use may lead to permanent hair damage and loss

Related Article: Hair Straightener Cancer Lawsuit Info

Do You Qualify for a Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuit if:

• You used Just For Me Hair Relaxer products regularly
• You have been diagnosed with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer, breast cancer, endometriosis, or uterine fibroids after using the product
• You can provide medical documentation linking your injuries to hair relaxer use
• You are seeking compensation for damages including medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional distress

Evidence Required for a Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

To prove causation in a Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuit, you typically need:

• Medical records documenting your health condition and diagnosis
• Evidence of product use (receipts, photographs, testimony)
• Expert testimony linking the hair relaxer to your condition

Damages You Can Recover

If successful, you may be entitled to compensation for:

• Medical expenses (past and future treatment)
• Lost wages due to illness
• Pain and suffering
• Ongoing treatment costs
• Emotional distress

Statute of Limitations for Just For Me Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Legal claims are subject to statutes of limitations, meaning there is a deadline by which you must file your lawsuit. These deadlines vary by state and can depend on factors such as:

• When you were diagnosed with a related health condition
• When you became aware of the potential link between hair relaxers and your illness
• Exceptions that may apply based on your circumstances

Since the legal timeline can be complex, speaking with an experienced attorney is crucial to avoid missing your deadline.

Related Articles:

• Mizani Hair Relaxer Litigation
• Soft & Beautiful Hair Relaxer Litigation
• Ultra Sheen Hair Relaxer Litigation

See all related product liability lawsuits our lawyers have covered.

FAQs

1. What are hair relaxers used for?

Hair relaxers, also commonly referred to as hair straighteners, have been around for more than a century and are most often used by Black women to force their hair to lay flat and make it more manageable. Hair relaxers achieve this result by using strong chemicals that break down the protein structure of the hair.

2. What is Just For Me Hair Relaxer?

Soft & Beautiful Just For Me Relaxer contains moisturizing products that reduce hair breakage and provide a foundation for hair growth. The product contains coconut milk, Shea butter, vitamin E, sunflower oil, and other ingredients.

3. What harmful chemicals are found in hair relaxers?

Researchers have identified several harmful chemicals in hair relaxers including phthalates (often listed as “fragrance” or “perfume” on ingredient labels), parabens (used as preservatives), and formaldehyde (a known human carcinogen).

4. How does the legal process work for Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuits?

The Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuits are part of a larger multidistrict litigation (MDL) that includes lawsuits against multiple hair relaxer manufacturers. The case is currently in the discovery phase, with bellwether trials expected to begin in late 2025 or early 2026.

5. What alternatives can I use instead of chemical hair relaxers?

Instead of chemical hair relaxers or straighteners, you can try different combinations of techniques including blow drying with cold air, wrapping your hair, rolling with plastic rollers, sleeping with your hair wet, trying a hair mask, or applying essential oils.

6. How can an attorney help with a Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuit?

An attorney can help by evaluating your case, gathering necessary evidence, representing you in negotiations with the manufacturer and insurers, and litigating the case in court if a satisfactory settlement cannot be reached.

7. What is the current status of the Just For Me Hair Relaxer lawsuit?

The lawsuit is currently in the discovery phase, where evidence is being gathered to support claims against the manufacturers. Lawyers have filed motions to compel companies to release internal documents about the dangers of their products. No settlements have been offered yet, but as the case moves forward, compensation may be negotiated for affected consumers.

Take Action Now: Time-Sensitive Legal Claims

Time is limited to pursue legal action for Just For Me Hair Relaxer injuries. The statute of limitations varies by state, giving you only a limited time from the date of injury or discovery to file your claim.

The Products Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP offers:

• Free, confidential consultations
• No upfront costs or fees
• Payment only if we win your case

Start Your Free Case Review Now

References: 

1. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jnci/djac165/6759686?login=false
2. https://www.schmidtandclark.com/wp-content/uploads/DEHP-Complaint-J.-Mitchell-Illinois-FINAL-00848754xE6B76-1.docx