Nevada Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit

Have you or a family member faced health challenges as a result of using hair relaxer products? This concerning matter has garnered significant attention, particularly in Nevada, where the Nevada hair relaxer cancer lawsuit is being pursued against manufacturers of these products.

If you or someone you hold dear has encountered health issues due to the use of hair relaxers, you may qualify for compensation. Schmidt & Clark, LLP is readily available to offer complimentary consultations, providing you with the opportunity to discuss any apprehensions related to the usage of chemical hair relaxers.

In this blog post, we’ll explore the ins and outs of these lawsuits, including the companies involved, health implications, and potential settlements.

Nevada Hair Relaxer Lawsuit

Hair relaxer lawsuits have been on the rise as more people become aware of the potential health risks associated with these products. If you’re a Nevada resident diagnosed with cancer after using chemical hair relaxers, you may be eligible for compensation through a hair relaxer class action lawsuit.

Joining the hair relaxer cancer lawsuit allows you to seek justice and hold hair relaxer manufacturers accountable for their actions. Legal options are available for those affected by hair relaxer cancer in Nevada, and our legal team can help you navigate the process and determine your eligibility.

Understanding the hair relaxer industry and the potential risks associated with these products is paramount. We’ll delve into the nature of chemical hair relaxers and their potential health impacts.

What Is a Chemical Hair Relaxer?

Chemical hair relaxers are products primarily used by Black women to straighten their hair by breaking down the disulfide bonds in the hair’s cortex. Common chemicals found in these products include sodium hydroxide, ammonium thioglycolate, and sodium thioglycolate.

Unfortunately, the FDA doesn’t require individual chemicals to be labeled when blended with a “perfume” or fragrance, making it difficult for consumers to identify potentially hazardous chemicals in hair relaxers. Companies like L’Oreal USA, Inc. have been marketing their hair straightener products, such as chemical hair straighteners, to Black women and children for decades.

Despite the desired hair texture that hair relaxers may offer, understanding the potential risks and side effects of these chemical hair relaxer products is key.

Health Implications

Prolonged use of hair relaxers has been associated with a heightened risk of being diagnosed with uterine cancer or even likely to develop uterine cancer due to the use of hair relaxer products. [1].

Hair relaxers come with a range of health hazards, such as the potential for scalp lesions and burns, which can facilitate the entry of harmful chemicals into the body. Moreover, the application of heat through processes like flat ironing or blow drying during hair straightening treatments can release or break down detrimental chemicals, further amplifying exposure.

As a result, numerous lawsuits have been filed against hair relaxer manufacturers, alleging that their products can cause cancer.

Furthermore, the chemicals in hair relaxers can disrupt endocrine function, leading to an increased risk of certain cancers, such as uterine cancer [2]. Awareness of these risks is vital when using hair relaxers, and considering alternative hair care options could safeguard your health.

What Companies and Products are Involved in the Hair Relaxer Lawsuits?

Several hair relaxer manufacturers are facing lawsuits due to the potential cancer-causing effects of their products. These companies include:

• L’Oreal
• SoftSheen
• Strength of Nature
• Namaste
• Dabur International (parent company of Namaste Laboratories)
• L’Oréal
• Revlon
• Softsheen-Carson
• Strength of Nature

These manufacturers are among those being sued in new hair relaxer lawsuits, which has led to an increase in hair relaxer litigation.

Holding these companies accountable opens a path for individuals affected by hair relaxer-related cancers to seek compensation and justice.

What Does It Cost To Hire a Nevada Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyer?

Many Nevada hair relaxer cancer lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are no upfront costs for clients seeking legal action. This arrangement makes it more accessible for those affected by hair relaxer-related cancers, such as ovarian cancer, to pursue justice without the burden of initial legal fees.

You can consult with a lawyer at Schmidt & Clark directly to discuss the specifics of your case and any associated costs.

Who Can File a Lawsuit for Hair Relaxer Products in Nevada?

Nevada residents diagnosed with cancer after using hair relaxer products may be eligible to file a lawsuit and seek compensation.

To commence a lawsuit, certain conditions must be satisfied, and it is essential to accumulate supporting evidence to validate your claim. This entails preserving receipts for the hair relaxer product and maintaining documentation of your cancer diagnosis.

How Much Time Do I Have to File a Hair Relaxer Lawsuit in Nevada?

The statute of limitations for filing a hair relaxer lawsuit in Nevada is generally two years from the date of the injury.

However, it is important to consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer to determine the proper deadline for filing suit, as there are many factors that may affect which statute of limitations is applicable, and there are numerous exceptions that can reduce a limitations period.

Settlements and Compensation

The settlements and compensation available for hair relaxer cancer lawsuits depend on the individual case details. Factors such as the health issues caused by using hair relaxer products, the companies involved, and the extent of damages can influence the cash settlements related to hair relaxers.

Settlements in hair relaxer lawsuits can vary widely, ranging from $300,000 to $1,750,000, depending on the severity of the disease and the extent of damages incurred.

While the settlement amounts can differ, the potential for significant financial recovery exists, providing much-needed compensation for those affected by hair relaxer-related cancers. By pursuing a hair relaxer lawsuit, you can seek justice and hold the hair relaxer industry accountable for their products’ potential health risks.

Related Articles:

• Missouri Hair Relaxer Lawsuit
• Montana Hair Relaxer Litigation
• Nebraska Hair Relaxer Attorney

FAQs

Can international brands of hair relaxers be subject to lawsuits in the U.S.?

Yes, international brands sold in the U.S. can be subject to lawsuits if their products cause harm to consumers. U.S. courts have jurisdiction over products sold in the country.

What should I do if I suspect other health issues from hair relaxers besides cancer?

Seek medical advice for any health issues you suspect are related to hair relaxer use. Document your symptoms and consult with a lawyer to explore potential legal actions.

How can hair stylists protect themselves from exposure to harmful chemicals in relaxers?

Stylists can use protective gear like gloves and masks, ensure proper ventilation, and switch to using safer, chemical-free products. Regular health check-ups are also important.

See all related product liability lawsuits our attorneys have covered so far.

Connect with Our Nevada Legal Team

Nevada hair relaxer cancer lawsuits offer a path to justice and compensation for those affected by hair relaxer-related cancers. By understanding the risks associated with chemical hair relaxers, the companies involved, and your legal options, you can take the necessary steps to hold these manufacturers accountable and seek the financial recovery you deserve.

If you or a loved one have been affected by hair relaxer-related cancers, our Nevada legal team at Schmidt & Clark, LLP is here to help.

We’re committed to assisting you in pursuing justice and compensation for your suffering. Don’t hesitate to reach out to us and explore your legal options for a hair relaxer lawsuit.

References

1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3746223/
2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316883/