FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

New Hampshire Firefighter Foam Lawsuit: Find the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Firefighters in New Hampshire are taking legal action over AFFF, a firefighting foam linked to cancer. This escalating New Hampshire firefighter foam lawsuit targets manufacturers accused of neglecting to warn about the dangers of toxic chemicals in the foam.

If you or a loved one has been affected by exposure to firefighting foam, the law firm of Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is prepared to offer support. Recognized for our proficiency in advocating for plaintiffs, our primary commitment is to ensure that you receive the justice and rightful financial restitution you are entitled to.

Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits

The correlation between AFFF and cancer has resulted in a surge of firefighting foam lawsuit cases in the United States, including a growing number of afff foam lawsuits.

Firefighters and others exposed to these firefighting foams have come forward to file lawsuits, alleging their cancer resulted from AFFF exposure. The number of these lawsuits is staggering, with over 5,000 cases filed as of 2024.

Key Points from Lawsuits

The AFFF cancer lawsuits in New Hampshire are centered around the critical issue of exposure to toxic chemicals in firefighting foams and the subsequent health risks, particularly cancer.

These lawsuits emphasize the lack of warnings provided to firefighters and other individuals who were in contact with AFFF, despite the growing evidence linking the foam’s chemicals to serious health conditions.

The legal actions seek to address the accountability of entities responsible for the manufacture and distribution of AFFF and to obtain compensation for those who have suffered due to this exposure.

This lack of transparency has resulted in numerous individuals developing various forms of cancer, most notably kidney cancer.

What Is AFFF?

According to the Division of Spill Prevention and Response, AFFF is called Aqueous Film-Forming Foam or film-forming foam. AFFF is commonly used as a fire suppressant to put out fires caused by flammable liquids. It forms a film that suppresses the fire’s oxygen and prevents reignition [1].

Its effectiveness lies in its ability to quickly form a film over the fire, cutting off the oxygen supply and extinguishing the flames. The composition of AFFF includes water, foam concentrate, and air. The foam concentrate typically contains surfactants and fluorosurfactants, which contribute to AFFF’s fire-suppressing properties.

AFFF was developed by the US Navy in the mid-1960s and gained widespread use in the following decade, particularly within the Department of Defense. Its ability to combat fuel fires at military installations made it a crucial tool in firefighting.

Who Are The Defendants In AFFF Lawsuits in New Hampshire?

The defendants in AFFF lawsuits in New Hampshire include Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Amerex Corporation, Clariant Corporation, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., PBI Performance Products, Inc., Arkema Inc., Archroma, 3M, DuPont, Chemours, Tyco Fire Protection Products, and Kidde-Fenwal.

These AFFF manufacturers are accused of supplying products containing potentially harmful PFAS compounds, despite knowledge of their potential for contamination. Specifically, 3M faces allegations for their products’ PFAS content, while DuPont’s involvement stems from their AFFF and fluorosurfactants, assumed to contain PFAS.

Evidence suggests that 3M and DuPont were aware of the toxicity of PFAS in firefighting foam as early as the 1970s. Internal studies and documents indicate that these companies knew that PFOA and PFOS, two common types of PFAS, were toxic and accumulating in people’s blood.

According to the National Cancer Institute, studies have established a strong correlation between exposure to AFFF and various types of cancer, primarily due to the presence of PFAS chemicals [2].

Cancer cases presented in these lawsuits span a wide range of types, including:

This vast array of cancers linked to AFFF exposure indicates the potential widespread impact of this issue.

Does Firefighting Foam Contain PFAS?

As claimed by the Chem Trust Organization, firefighting foam does contain PFAS. Specifically, the foam concentrate in AFFF often contains surfactants and fluorosurfactants, which are PFAS chemicals. These PFAS chemicals act as surfactants, helping the foam spread over the fire, cooling it, and suppressing it effectively [3].

Possible sources of occupational exposure to PFAS include turnout gear, aqueous film-forming foam, and air and dust at both the fire scene and fire station – National Library of Medicine

Their presence is, therefore, integral to AFFF’s effectiveness in firefighting. However, this effectiveness comes at a cost. The same PFAS chemicals that make AFFF so efficient at combatting fires have been linked to various health issues, including cancer.

Common Injuries Linked To Firefighting Foam PFAS

PFAS chemicals in AFFF, known as toxic chemicals, have been associated with a range of cancers. Studies have indicated a link between PFAS exposure and testicular and kidney cancers, as well as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

More specifically, scientific studies have found connections between toxic firefighting foam exposure and various types of cancer, including testicular, kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer.

These findings underscore the potential health risks faced by individuals exposed to AFFF firefighting foams, particularly firefighters and military personnel, who often use these foams, including AFFF firefighting foam, in their line of duty.

Who Qualifies for the AFFF Lawsuit in New Hampshire?

Firefighters, military personnel, or airport workers who have been exposed to AFFF chemicals qualify for the AFFF lawsuit in New Hampshire.

This evidence could include records of AFFF usage at their place of work or residence or medical records linking their cancer diagnosis to AFFF exposure.

How Do AFFF Lawsuits Work?

AFFF lawsuits work by adhering to the process of multidistrict litigation (MDL). This method consolidates individual personal injury claims related to AFFF exposure into a single MDL case to streamline the legal process and address common issues across cases.

This MDL case is then divided based on the nature of the claims, such as water contamination claims and AFFF exposure cases. The MDL process includes pretrial proceedings, discovery, and motion practice. In some instances, bellwether trials may be scheduled to assess the strength of the claims.

Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits Settlement Amounts in New Hampshire

In New Hampshire, settlement amounts in AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits can greatly fluctuate. This variation depends on elements such as the robustness of the evidence, the gravity of the injuries, and the negotiation prowess of the parties involved.

Settlements, in some cases, have resulted in payouts ranging from tens of thousands to several million dollars. While it’s hard to predict the exact amount, it’s clear that these lawsuits carry significant financial implications for the defendants and potential financial relief for the victims.

Potential Compensation for Victims of Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits in New Hampshire

In New Hampshire, victims involved in firefighting foam cancer lawsuits could qualify for compensation addressing various damages.

This could include medical expenses incurred due to related health conditions, wages lost due to inability to work, and compensation for pain and suffering caused by the disease. If you or a loved one has been affected, consider exploring your options for a firefighting foam lawsuit.

The extent of the compensation would depend on the specific circumstances of each case, including the severity of the disease, the extent of exposure to AFFF, and the impact of the disease on the individual’s quality of life.

Filing a New Hampshire Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuit

When filing a New Hampshire firefighting foam cancer lawsuit, it’s imperative to compile pertinent evidence and seek advice from experienced firefighting foam lawyers. Understanding the state’s statute of limitations is also vital.

Types of Evidence To Present

The evidence presented in a lawsuit could encompass the following:

  • Medical records that affirm the individual’s cancer diagnosis and health history
  • Records of AFFF usage at the individual’s workplace or residence
  • Witness testimonies of its usage

These pieces of evidence could serve as crucial evidence in the case.

Such evidence can help establish a causal link between the individual’s cancer and their AFFF exposure, strengthening their compensation case.

New Hampshire Statute of Limitation

Typically, the statute of limitations for personal injury claims in New Hampshire is three years, counting from the date of injury or when the injury was discovered. This means individuals generally have three years from when they were injured or discovered their injury to file a lawsuit.

However, there are exceptions to this rule, such as cases involving:

  • libel and slander
  • fraud
  • injury to personal property
  • professional malpractice
  • cases involving minors

It’s, therefore, crucial to consult with a knowledgeable lawyer to understand how the statute applies to your specific situation.

Related Articles:

See all related toxic tort lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been injured or exposed to a toxic chemical at work or in the home that has caused a severe life-threatening side effect, illness, disease, or death?

Get Your Free Consultation From New Hampshire Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawyers

Schmidt & Clark, LLP stands ready to assist during these pivotal moments. Should you or a loved one suffer from injuries linked to firefighting foam exposure, reach out to us without delay. Our seasoned team specializes in such cases and will steer you through each step of the legal journey.

It’s essential to comprehend your legal entitlements and determine your eligibility for a firefighting foam lawsuit. We offer complimentary consultations, and our policy ensures you incur no fees unless we secure a favorable verdict or settlement in your case. 

Reach out to Schmidt & Clark for an in-depth analysis of your firefighting foam-related case. 

Reference:

  1. https://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/pfas/firefighting-foam/
  2. https://dceg.cancer.gov/research/what-we-study/pfas
  3. https://chemtrust.org/pfas/

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.