FREE Case Review (866) 588-0600

Idaho Firefighter Foam Lawsuit: Get the Right Attorney

Award Logos
Awards & recognition
C.L. Mike Schmidt Published by C.L. Mike Schmidt

Idaho firefighters have filed lawsuits against AFFF manufacturers due to serious health concerns, primarily cancer, linked to exposure to firefighting foams.

If you’re an affected firefighter, or a family member thereof, seeking justice and compensation, this article explains the Idaho firefighter foam lawsuit.

Should you or a loved one be experiencing the adverse effects of firefighting foam exposure, Schmidt & Clark, LLP, stands prepared to offer support.

With our notable experience in championing the rights of plaintiffs, our overriding mission is to ensure that you receive the justice and fair compensation to which you are entitled.

Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits

Airport and military firefighters in Idaho are taking legal action against the makers of AFFF firefighting foam, accusing them of negligence in its production and distribution.

This toxic firefighting foam has allegedly led to numerous individuals being diagnosed with cancers such as testicular, kidney, and pancreatic.

The link between cancer and AFFF is now widely recognized, and the firefighting foam lawsuits in Idaho reflect a nationwide response to this health crisis. The issue’s urgency has been amplified by numerous scientific studies and increasing legal cases, leading to urgent calls for action.

Each new case underscores the urgency for more thorough regulation and the development of safer alternatives to this PFAS-containing foam.

Key Points from Lawsuits

The lawsuits allege that the main manufacturers of AF, 3M, and DuPont were aware of the health risks their products posed but neglected to inform users. The manufacturers are accused of not only withholding critical information but also persisting in the production and distribution of the hazardous firefighting foam, knowing it could be harmful.

Moreover, the AFFF firefighting foam lawsuit asserts that such irresponsible conduct has exposed numerous firefighters to the hazardous chemicals in AFFF, causing a significant increase in cancer diagnoses. The allegations also encompass water supply contamination affecting individuals who haven’t directly interacted with the foam.

The multi-district litigation (MDL) approach streamlines the legal process, facilitating a more efficient and coordinated pursuit of compensation.

What Is AFFF?

According to the Division of Spill Prevention and Response, AFFF is an acronym for Aqueous Film Forming Foam, a firefighting agent specifically designed to extinguish intense fires fueled by flammable liquids such as alcohol, ether, oil, gasoline, and grease [1].

Its proficiency in controlling Class B fires has established it as a mainstay in the firefighting industry, especially at airports and military bases where the fire risk is elevated.

However, the use of AFFF comes with significant risks. The foam contains chemicals such as PFOS and PFOA, which are part of a group known as PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These substances are linked to several health issues, including:

  • liver damage
  • immune system suppression
  • developmental issues in children

Who Are The Defendants In AFFF Lawsuits in Idaho?

The defendants in AFFF lawsuits in Idaho include companies involved in the production and distribution of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), such as 3M, Tyco, Chemguard, Buckeye, and National Foam.

These companies stand accused of contributing to the health risks faced by firefighters and others due to the toxic nature of the firefighting foam they manufactured and sold.

These companies are accused of negligence in AFFF’s design and production and failure to alert consumers about the potential health risks tied to its use.

3M, a significant AFFF manufacturer, is particularly charged with manufacturing a harmful product and inadequately warning users about the associated risks.

Chemguard and Buckeye Fire Equipment, both implicated in the lawsuits, face similar charges. Legal actions against these companies are a critical move toward holding them responsible for their alleged negligence.

According to the National Cancer Institute, a troubling link exists between firefighting foam and cancer. Studies have uncovered an association between AFFF, particularly its PFAS content, and elevated rates of kidney, testicular, and prostate cancer [2].

This connection has triggered a global debate about the safety of firefighting foams and the necessity for safer substitutes.

Numerous firefighters lodging lawsuits in Idaho were consistently exposed to AFFF during their work. Unbeknownst to them, their health was at risk with each call to duty. The revelation of this link between their cancer diagnoses and the AFFF they trusted for life protection has provoked a surge in legal action.

Does Firefighting Foam Contain PFAS?

According to the Department of Natural Resources, firefighting foam does contain PFAS, chemicals notoriously dubbed ‘forever chemicals’ because of their long-lasting presence in both the environment and the human body [3]. These chemicals make their way into the soil and groundwater, contaminating wells and drinking water supplies.

The occurrence of PFAS in firefighting foam is of significant concern, affecting not only firefighters but also the communities where the foam is deployed. These chemicals can permeate soil and water once released into the environment, potentially subjecting numerous people to their detrimental effects.

Common Injuries Linked To Firefighting Foam PFAS

Exposure to PFAS in firefighting foam has profound and serious health implications. Exposure-related injuries frequently encompass:

Possible sources of occupational exposure to PFAS include turnout gear, aqueous film-forming foam, and air and dust at both the fire scene and fire station. – National Library of Medicine.

Scientific investigations corroborate these assertions, establishing a link between PFAS exposure and heightened cancer risk, including pancreatic cancer.

Who Qualifies for the AFFF Lawsuit in Idaho?

Individuals such as firefighters, military personnel, airport workers, and family members who have been impacted by AFFF-induced cancer and have been exposed to AFFF firefighting foam in Idaho qualify for the AFFF lawsuit in Idaho.

To be eligible, it’s necessary to show repeated exposure to AFFF and a consequent cancer diagnosis. Those who meet these criteria may seek compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and endured pain and suffering.

How Do AFFF Lawsuits Work?

AFFF lawsuits work by integrating individual cases into a larger multi-district litigation (MDL) framework. This process is essential for Idaho residents considering legal action. By joining the MDL, similar lawsuits from across the country are combined in one federal court for the pretrial stages.

This method streamlines the legal proceedings, providing a more organized and effective approach to handling numerous cases that share common issues. This consolidated approach enhances the efficiency and coherence of the legal process.

You should consult a lawyer regarding your exposure to firefighting foam and any consequent illnesses. Upon filing the lawsuit, the case undergoes several phases such as:

  • the initial complaint
  • discovery
  • court hearings
  • settlement negotiations or a trial verdict

The compensation amount is decided based on multiple factors, including the case’s strength and the type of cancer involved.

Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits Settlement Amounts in Idaho

Many people wonder about the potential payout from a firefighting foam lawsuit. Settlement amounts for AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits in Idaho can vary, with averages potentially ranging from $75k to $600k, contingent on the case’s strength and the type of cancer involved.

Remarkably, the highest settlement amount recorded for AFFF firefighting foam lawsuits in Idaho reached $1.185 billion.

It’s worth noting that compensation amounts are determined individually, considering factors like:

  • the cancer’s severity
  • medical expenses
  • lost income
  • pain and suffering

Thus, each case is distinctive, and settlement amounts can vary substantially.

Potential Compensation for Victims of Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuits in Idaho

Victims involved in Idaho’s firefighting foam cancer lawsuits could potentially secure compensation to cover a spectrum of costs and impacts. This may encompass:

Compensation calculation takes into account the severity of health issues, the degree of exposure to the firefighting foam, and the specifics of the cancer diagnosis. Potential damages for loss of consortium, referring to lost companionship, affection, or other personal relationship benefits due to the illness, are also considered.

Filing an Idaho Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawsuit

Several key steps are involved in filing an Idaho firefighting foam cancer lawsuit. Initially, you need to collect evidence, including employment history and medical records, substantiating your exposure to AFFF and a consequent cancer diagnosis. Subsequently, it’s vital to comply with the statute of limitations, setting a deadline for lawsuit filing.

Working with AFFF attorneys can help ensure that you follow the correct steps and increase your chances of a successful outcome.

Types of Evidence To Present

Presenting compelling evidence is crucial when filing an Idaho firefighting foam cancer lawsuit. This evidence should encompass your work history, medical records, and confirmation of your exposure to AFFF. Employment records indicating frequent AFFF use in your workplace can be particularly advantageous.

Medical records also play a fundamental role in your case. These records should detail your cancer diagnosis and any treatments administered. Finally, any documents or evidence connecting your cancer to AFFF exposure can fortify your case.

Idaho Statute of Limitation

Idaho’s statute of limitations establishes a two-year window from the incident date to file a personal injury claim, encompassing those related to firefighting foam exposure. Nevertheless, cancer-related lawsuits may present exceptions to this rule, potentially extending this timeframe.

Non-compliance with the statute of limitations can lead to grave consequences, including your case’s dismissal. Hence, it’s essential to act swiftly and consult an informed attorney to ensure timely lawsuit filing within the prescribed timeframe.

Related Articles:

See all related toxic tort lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

Choose our lawyers

Have you or a loved one been injured or exposed to a toxic chemical at work or in the home that has caused a severe life-threatening side effect, illness, disease, or death?

Get Your Free Consultation From Idaho Firefighting Foam Cancer Lawyers

At Schmidt & Clark, LLP we stand by your side during these pivotal moments. If you or a loved one has suffered due to firefighting foam exposure, reach out to us without delay. Our proficient team excels in handling such cases and will support you at every step along the way.

It’s crucial to grasp your legal entitlements and determine your eligibility for a firefighting foam lawsuit. We offer complimentary consultations, and our commitment is such that you incur no fees unless we secure a favorable resolution for your case.

For a comprehensive case review regarding firefighting foam exposure, connect with Schmidt & Clark. Allow us to be your steadfast partner through this complex ordeal.

Reference:

  1. https://dec.alaska.gov/spar/csp/pfas/firefighting-foam/
  2. https://dceg.cancer.gov/research/what-we-study/pfas
  3. https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/topic/PFAS/AFFF.html

Free Confidential Case Evaluation

Verified 100% Secure SiteTo contact us for a free review of your potential case, please fill out the form below or call us toll free 24 hrs/day by dialing: (866) 588-0600.