Published by The G2 X IVC Filter by Bard is a device engineered for implantation in the inferior vena cava, the vein responsible for transporting oxygen-poor (blue) blood back to the heart from the body. This wire cage device is aimed at intercepting blood clots which, if not caught, could progress to the lungs and result in a life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Regrettably, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has been notified of almost 1,000 instances where IVC filters have led to serious, and occasionally critical, health issues.
Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has had an IVC filter implanted, you should contact our law firm immediately. Our lawyers are evaluating every individual case regardless of whether you have been injured or not. So, if you have received an IVC filter implant, we would like to speak with you. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit against the manufacturer and our lawyers can help.
Table Of Contents
- Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuit Overview
- Latest Bard G2X IVC Filter Lawsuit Updates
- Bard G2 X IVC Filter Injuries & Side Effects
- Do You Qualify for a Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuit?
- Statute of Limitations for Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuits
- FAQs
- 1. What is the role of the FDA in the Bard G2 X IVC Filter lawsuit?
- 2. What happens if the Bard G2 X IVC filter case settles out of court?
- 3. How do recalls affect Bard G2 X IVC filter lawsuits?
- 4. What is the Bard G2 X?
- 5. How is the G2 X different from other IVC filters?
- 6. Why are retrievable IVC filters potentially problematic?
- 7. Are you filing a class action lawsuit for Bard G2 X IVC Filter injuries?
- Take Action Now: Time-Sensitive Legal Claims
Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuit Overview
The Bard G2 X IVC Filter lawsuits involve allegations against manufacturers regarding device failure. The FDA has been notified of almost 1,000 instances where IVC filters have led to serious, and occasionally critical, health issues. The lawsuits center on complications including filter fracture, migration, and perforation of the inferior vena cava.
Latest Bard G2X IVC Filter Lawsuit Updates
December 10, 2024 – FDA received an adverse event report (MDR Report #2020394-2024-01785) concerning a Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. G2X Vena Cava Filter system. The patient injury documented includes alleged filter fracture and perforation of adjacent organs [1].
May 2019 – Bard reached a confidential settlement agreement with about 8,000 plaintiffs in their IVC MDL [2].
2010 – FDA issued a safety communication after having received 921 device adverse event reports since 2005 involving IVC filters, of which, 328 involved device migration, 146 involved embolizations (detachment of device components), 70 involved perforation of the IVC, and 56 involved filter fracture. Some of these events led to adverse clinical outcomes in patients [3].
Bard G2 X IVC Filter Injuries & Side Effects
The Bard G2 X IVC Filter has been associated with several serious complications, particularly when the device fractures or migrates from the implant site.
- Fracture: Device components may break apart
- Migration: Filter can move from its implanted position, potentially to the heart
- Bleeding: Internal bleeding can occur as a complication
- Perforation of vena cava: The device may puncture the blood vessel wall
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT): Blood clots may form in the deep veins
- Leg swelling: A symptom that may indicate complications
- Infection (bacteremia): Bacterial infection in the bloodstream
- Retrieval complications: Difficulties during removal procedures, especially if the device has fractured or migrated
Do You Qualify for a Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuit?
You may qualify for a Bard G2 X IVC Filter lawsuit if:
- You had a Bard G2 X IVC Filter implanted
- You experienced serious side effects including fracture, migration, perforation, or other complications
- The injuries required medical treatment or hospitalization
Evidence Required for a Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuit
Medical documentation linking your injuries to the Bard G2 X IVC Filter will be required to support your case.
Damages You Can Recover
While specific damages information was not provided in the original article, the lawsuit evaluation mentions potential compensation for those who have received an IVC filter implant.
Statute of Limitations for Bard G2 X IVC Filter Lawsuits
It’s important to note that statute of limitations generally vary by state. Personal injury claims typically have a statute of limitations ranging from 1-6 years, depending on the state where you file, and the time limit usually begins from the date of injury or from when you discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) the injury related to the Bard G2 X IVC Filter.
Because statutes of limitations can significantly impact your legal rights, you should consult with an attorney as soon as possible if you believe you have a claim.
Related Articles:
- Bard G2 Express IVC Filter Lawsuit
- Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit Florida
- Bard Meridian IVC Filter Class Action
See all related medical device lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.
FAQs
1. What is the role of the FDA in the Bard G2 X IVC Filter lawsuit?
The FDA monitors and regulates medical devices, and any findings or recalls related to Bard G2 X IVC filters can impact lawsuits.
2. What happens if the Bard G2 X IVC filter case settles out of court?
If the case settles out of court, you will receive an agreed-upon amount of compensation without going through a trial.
3. How do recalls affect Bard G2 X IVC filter lawsuits?
Recalls can provide strong evidence of a product defect and support claims in lawsuits. Information about recalls can be used to bolster your case.
4. What is the Bard G2 X?
Bard Medical makes the G2 X, a vena cava filter designed to be used for short-term protection against pulmonary embolism. The device was intended to be an improved version of the G2, which is a nitinol filter with 6 arms and legs with elastic hooks for easier implantation and retrieval.
5. How is the G2 X different from other IVC filters?
The G2 X is a G2 filter modified with an apical hook which enables snare retrieval.
6. Why are retrievable IVC filters potentially problematic?
Unlike permanent filters, retrievable ones should be removed as soon as the risk of pulmonary embolism has subsided. If they are not taken out in a timely manner, recipients are more likely to experience adverse health consequences.
7. Are you filing a class action lawsuit for Bard G2 X IVC Filter injuries?
No. Although we are a nationally recognized class action firm, the Products Liability Litigation Group at our law firm has decided against the filing of a Bard G2 X IVC Filter Class Action Suit and is currently filing individual claims on behalf of individuals and/or their family members who suffered serious injuries after receiving an IVC Filter. We believe individual claims better serve our clients with Bard G2 X IVC Filter injuries, as each person’s medical situation, injuries, and damages are unique and may require personalized legal attention.
Take Action Now: Time-Sensitive Legal Claims
Time is limited to pursue legal action regarding Bard G2 X IVC Filter complications. The Medical Device Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP is currently accepting new cases in all 50 states.
Our services include:
- Free, confidential consultations
- Evaluation of every individual case regardless of whether you have been injured
- No upfront costs or fees
- Payment only if we win your case
Start Your Free Case Review Now
References: