Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuit | 2025 Latest Updates

Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuit Overview

The Kariño baby pacifiers lawsuits involve products that failed to meet federal safety standards. The primary allegations against distributor Antonio Flores include design defects that create choking and aspiration hazards for infants. Approximately 44,900 pacifiers were recalled after it was found that the nipple could separate from the base easily, the handle was too long, the mouth guard was too small, and there were no ventilation holes on the mouth guard.

Latest Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuit Updates

June 28, 2023 – NUK Orthodontic Pacifiers are facing a class action lawsuit over claims that their products do not support children’s dental development as advertised [1].

July 28, 2010 – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a voluntary recall of about 44,900 Kariño baby pacifiers distributed by Antonio Flores of San Ysidro, California, due to multiple safety hazards including choking risks.

CPSC Reports and Statistics

The recalled Kariño baby pacifiers failed multiple federal safety standards, creating significant risks for infants. Product safety concerns include:

• Easily detachable nipples, which could separate from the base and pose a choking hazard.
• Handles exceeding federal length requirements, potentially creating safety concerns.
• Undersized mouth guards, which lacked the required ventilation holes and increased the risk of suffocation.
• Nipples filled with corn syrup, which posed an ingestion hazard.

These pacifiers were distributed in California and Texas from October 2009 through March 2010 through independent grocery stores.

Kariño Baby Pacifiers Injuries & Side Effects

The recalled Kariño baby pacifiers posed several serious health and safety risks to infants:

• Choking Hazards: Detachable nipples and small parts that can be swallowed or aspirated
• Aspiration Injuries: Corn syrup-filled nipples that could cause respiratory complications if contents are aspirated
• Suffocation Risks: Inadequate mouth guard design without proper ventilation
• Oral Development Issues: Improperly sized pacifiers can impact dental and oral development

Do You Qualify for a Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuit?

You may qualify for a Kariño baby pacifiers lawsuit if:

• Your child used a Kariño pacifier purchased between October 2009 and March 2010
• Your child experienced choking, aspiration, or other injuries related to pacifier defects
• The injuries required medical treatment or hospitalization
• You can provide medical documentation linking your child’s injuries to the Kariño pacifier

Evidence Required for a Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuit

To successfully pursue a Kariño baby pacifiers lawsuit, you’ll need to provide:

• Medical records documenting injuries and treatment
• Proof of purchase or possession of the recalled pacifier
• Testimony from healthcare providers linking injuries to the product
• Product packaging or the actual pacifier (if available)

Damages You Can Recover

In a successful Kariño baby pacifiers lawsuit, you may be entitled to compensation for:

• Medical expenses for emergency care and ongoing treatment
• Pain and suffering experienced by your child
• Emotional distress experienced by parents and family
• Punitive damages against the manufacturer for negligence
• Future medical costs for any long-term complications

Kariño Baby Pacifiers Recall Information

Approximate Units Affected: 44,900

Recall Date: July 20, 2010

Models Affected: All Kariño pacifiers distributed by Antonio Flores

Identifying Features: Ring-shaped handle, round-shaped mouth guard, “Kariño” printed on the handle, “Mygra” printed on one side of the handle

CPSC Information: The recall was announced and supervised by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)

Hazards Identified:

• Easily detachable nipples filled with corn syrup, creating ingestion hazards
• Handles exceeding federal length requirements
• Undersized mouth guards increasing suffocation risk
• Absence of required ventilation holes on mouth guards

Distribution: Distributed in California and Texas from October 2009 through March 2010 through independent grocery stores.

Statute of Limitations for Kariño Baby Pacifiers Lawsuits

Product liability claims involving baby products typically must be filed within 2-3 years from the date of injury or discovery of injury, depending on your state’s laws. Some states also have specific provisions for injuries to minors that may extend this timeframe.

Related Articles:

• Baby Spoons Lawsuit
• Orbeez Water Beads Lawsuit
• Jelly Cups Recall Lawsuit

See all related product liability lawsuits our attorneys covered so far.

FAQs

1. What specifically makes the Kariño pacifiers dangerous?

The pacifiers fail multiple federal safety standards – the nipple can separate from the base easily, the handle is too long, the mouth guard is too small, and there are no ventilation holes on the mouth guard. Additionally, the nipples are filled with corn syrup which poses additional health risks if ingested.

2. How do I know if my child’s pacifier is part of the recall?

Recalled pacifiers have a ring-shaped handle and a round-shaped mouth guard with “Kariño” printed on the mouth guard and “Mygra” printed on one side of the handle. They were sold at independent grocery stores in California and Texas from October 2009 through March 2010.

3. What should I do if my child has been injured by a Kariño pacifier?

Seek immediate medical attention and document all injuries. Keep the pacifier and packaging if possible, and contact an experienced product liability attorney to discuss your legal options for compensation.

4. What compensation can be obtained in a baby pacifier recall lawsuit?

Compensation can include medical expenses, costs for long-term care, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and potentially punitive damages if negligence is proven.

5. How long does a baby pacifier lawsuit typically take to resolve?

The timeline varies depending on case complexity, but most product liability cases take 1-3 years to resolve through settlement or trial.

6. Is there a cost to have my case evaluated?

Schmidt&Clark offers free, no-obligation consultations for Kariño baby pacifier cases, and we only collect fees if we secure compensation for you.

7. Can I join a class action lawsuit for the Kariño pacifier recall?

Currently, cases are being handled as individual lawsuits rather than class actions, allowing for compensation based on your child’s specific injuries and circumstances.

8. What evidence is needed to support my lawsuit?

Evidence includes medical records showing the injury, proof of purchase or use of the recalled pacifier, expert testimony linking the injury to the product defect, and documentation of related expenses.

9. Are all pacifier injuries eligible for compensation?

Only injuries that can be directly linked to the specific defects in the recalled Kariño pacifiers would qualify for legal claims.

10. What makes Schmidt&Clark qualified to handle my case?

Our Product Liability Litigation Group focuses exclusively on representing plaintiffs in defective product cases nationwide, with specific experience in children’s product recalls and injuries.

Take Action Now: Time-Sensitive Legal Claims

Time is limited to pursue legal action for injuries caused by recalled Kariño baby pacifiers. Most states only allow 2-3 years from the date of injury to file a claim, and this timeframe may be affected by when the recall was announced.

 Schmidt Clark, LLP firm offers:

• Free, confidential consultations to evaluate your case
• No upfront costs or fees to begin your claim
• Payment only if we win your case and secure compensation

Don’t delay seeking justice for your child’s injuries from these dangerous products.

[START YOUR FREE CASE REVIEW NOW]

Reference:

[1] https://www.classaction.org/news/nuk-orthodontic-pacifiers-do-not-support-childrens-dental-development-as-advertised-class-action-says