Archive for category: Product Liability

Fireworks Injury Lawsuit

Fireworks 1

Thousands of people in the U.S. each year are injured while using fireworks. In most cases, these injuries occur because individuals do not understand the risks involved with fireworks, which include devastating burns, household fires, and even death.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by a firework, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

Update: TNT Fireworks Recalled for Exploding Prematurely

July 11, 2017 – American Promotional Events is recalling more than 36,000 units of TNT Red, White, & Blue Smoke fireworks amid reports that some of the devices exploded when lit. The recalled fireworks were sold at Walmart and Kroger stores in Illinois, Ohio, Vermont, and Wisconsin, according to the CPSC.

What’s the Problem?

When individual consumers purchase fireworks and use them in uncontrolled settings, there is a greater risk of danger compared to large-scale public fireworks shows, where all in attendance are typically safe from injury. There are also cases where injuries occur because of a firework defect.

NFPA Fireworks Report

The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) fireworks report provides estimates of fires and associated losses caused by fireworks through 2013. According to the NFPA, in 2013 alone U.S. hospital emergency rooms treated 11,400 people for firework-related injuries.

It was estimated that 55% of those injuries were to the extremities (arms, hands and legs), while 38% were to the head. On the 4th of July, 2 out of 5 fires that are started are due to fireworks – more than any other single cause of fire in the U.S.

These statistics clearly illustrate the severe risks of using fireworks. When these risks are exacerbated by irresponsible use or excess alcohol consumption, serious injuries may occur.

Negligence Cause of Most Injuries

In most cases, large-scale public fireworks shows are safe and entertaining for all in attendance. However, when individuals purchase these devices, there is a much higher potential for danger. Potential risks include misuse by the user and failure to follow safe procedures. However, there is also a risk of potential defect of the fireworks.

Defective Fireworks

In cases where defective fireworks are found to be the cause of an injury, the path to compensation may be complicated. This is especially true because most fireworks are manufactured outside the U.S. However, it is not only the manufacturer that may be liable for the injury. A product liability lawsuit may also target the local distributor, regional distributor or importer.

Fireworks Accident Statistics

  • Fireworks cause an average of nearly 18,500 reported fires per
    year.
  • Sparklers account for more than one-quarter of emergency room
    fireworks injuries.
  • Most injured body parts include hands and fingers (36%), eyes (19%), head, face and ears (19%), trunks (11%), and arms (5%).

Do I Have a Fireworks Injury Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in fireworks injury lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new injury cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you or a loved one has been injured in a fireworks accident, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

Fidget Spinner Lawsuit

Fidget Spinner

Bluetooth fidget spinners are being investigated by the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) after being linked to reports of catching fire while charging and children accidentally swallowing the toys.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by a fidget spinner or had property damage from a fidget spinner fire, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

Update: CPSC Issues New Warning on Fidget Spinner Risks

August 15, 2017 – The U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) has updated its guidance on burn injuries and choking hazards associated with fidget spinners. The commission recommends that consumers stay in the room when their fidget spinner is charging at all times, always to use the cable that came with the device, and keep the toys out of the hands of children 3-years-old or younger.

What’s the problem?

June 30, 2017 – At least two families reported that their bluetooth-enabled fidget spinners caught fire while charging, according to Time. In both cases the fire was caused by the toys’ batteries overheating.

Kimberly Allums said she heard her son screaming when he noticed his Chinese-made fidget spinner had burst into flames after it had been charging for about 45 minutes. The boy quickly put the toy in the sink to douse the fire, but Allums says the damage would have been much worse if they had been out of the house.

“[My son] noticed that it burst into flames and he just started screaming,” Allums said. “I was downstairs and all I heard was ‘fire, fire’ and the fidget spinner had literally — it wasn’t smoking, it was in flames.”

A similar case was reported in Michigan after a woman used a baby monitor charger to charge her spinner.

Fidget spinners are 3-pronged plastic toys with a spinning disc in the middle that were initially marketed as a treatment for children with autism and ADHD, but have since become the latest craze, leading them to be banned in many schools.

Some hi-tech spinners can play music streamed from a mobile phone, and include a lithium-ion battery to power the Bluetooth radio and speakers. However, several have found to be defective or unsafe, according to the CPSC.

Factory production lines in China have rapidly switched to making the toys cheaply and quickly, often sacrificing quality and safety checks in the process.

CPSC is warning owners not to charge devices without the cable they came with. It also issued a warning about leaving young children with fidget spinners because of the potential choking hazard.

Fidget Spinner Overheats, Nearly Burns 12-Year-Old California Girl

July 18, 2017 – A special needs child from Fair Oaks, California, was frightened and nearly injured when her bluetooth fidget spinner overheated and began hissing while being charged. Luckily, the 12-year-old wasn’t seriously hurt, but the incident scared her enough to stay away from the toys permanently. “I don’t want to see it again or nothing – it makes me want to throw up,” she said.

Do I Have a Fidget Spinner Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in fidget spinner lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new injury cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you were injured by a fidget spinner, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

E-Cigarette Explosion Lawsuit Filed in Illinois

Vape

An Illinois couple is suing two vape shops alleging that e-cigarette batteries purchased there caught fire and exploded in the husband’s pants, leaving him with third-degree burns.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was injured by an e-cigarette explosion, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

What’s the Problem?

June 29, 2017 – According to the lawsuit, Plaintiff Scott Schroeck was checking on a load of lumber in his truck when he felt a burning sensation in his front pocket, according to the Chicago Tribune. He said he had put a spare lithium-ion battery in each pocket for his e-cigarette.

Schroeck’s wife, Denise, alleges that she lost her husband’s companionship after the incident. The complaint alleges the batteries were defective and that no warnings were provided on the risk of explosion.

Defendants in the case include Rockin Vape, Tobacco Zone and battery manufacturer LG. Plaintiffs are alleging damages of negligence and product liability. The complaint was filed earlier this week in Cook County circuit court.

Do I Have an E-Cigarette Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in e-cig lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new vape explosion and popcorn lung cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you were burned by an exploding e-cig or vape, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

Dicamba FAQ

dicamba

Dicamba, a weed killer considered by many to be more toxic than Roundup, has been the subject of class action lawsuits filed by farmers who claim the herbicide ruined their crops.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was injured by dicamba, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

What’s the problem?

When sprayed, dicamba has a propensity to drift onto off-site locations, damaging other farmers’ crops. This phenomenon has been described as ‘dicamba drift.’ Farmers in at least 10 U.S. states have filed lawsuits seeking compensation for losses caused by dicamba drift.

How Much Crop Damage has Dicamba Caused?

In 2016, over 200,000 acres of crops were damaged from illegal use of unapproved, volatile formulations of dicamba, according to AgWeb.

How Do I Know if My Crops Were Damaged by Dicamba?

It can take 1 to 3 weeks for dicamba crop damage to appear. Symptoms only appear on newly emerging vegetation, and hot conditions can slow plant growth.

Can I Expect Cosmetic or Yield Damaging Effects?

Whether the injury is cosmetic or yield damaging depends on the dose and what stage the crop is in when dicamba drift occurs. Late vegetative and early reproductive stages of the soybean, peaking around R-1, are typically most sensitive.

What are ‘Over-the-Top’ Formulations?

A variety of chemical formulations have been designed to be applied over dicamba to reduce its drift effect. Monsanto’s XtendiMax uses VaporGrip technology to reduce volatility and help minimize drift. DuPont’s FeXapan also uses VaporGrip technology to reduce drift and volatility risks. BASF’s Engenia uses a new salt, BAPMA, to reduce volatility.

What is the Legal Status of Dicamba?

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state registrations allow use of dicamba on dicamba-resistant soybeans throughout the end of the year. This registration is scheduled to expire on November 9, 2018.

What Does Monsanto Say?

Monsanto has defended the safety of dicamba, saying that most cases of drift have been caused by improper application and not following label requirements.

Has Dicamba Been Linked to Health Risks in Humans?

Dicamba is toxic by ingestion, inhalation and dermal exposure. Signs and symptoms of dicamba toxicity include:

  • Loss of appetite (anorexia)
  • Vomiting
  • Muscle weakness
  • Slowed heart rate
  • Shortness of breath
  • Central nervous system effects (victim may become excited or depressed)
  • Benzoic acid in the urine
  • Incontinence
  • Cyanosis (bluing of the skin and gums)
  • Exhaustion following repeated muscle spasms

Are Dicamba Injury Suits Being Filed?

Our lawyers are currently only investigating injury reports associated with Dicamba. We are not filing claims related to crop damage from Dicamba.

Do I Have a Dicamba Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is investigating injury reports associated with the use of Dicamba herbicide. If you or a loved one was injured, you should contact our law firm immediately.

Dicamba Class Action Lawsuit

dicamba

Our lawyers are investigating injuries potentially related to the use of Dicamba, a herbicide designed by Monsanto to work with its next generation of biotech crops.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was injured by Dicamba, you should contact our law firm immediately.

How Does Dicamba Work?

Dicamba works by mimicking natural plant hormones called auxins. These hormones help to control plant growth. When plants are treated with dicamba, they grow in abnormal ways, typically dying as a result. Dicamba is used on many broadleaf weeds and woody plants.

What’s the Problem?

At issue is the Monsanto Company’s decision in 2016 to let growers plant Dicamba-tolerant Xtend cotton and soybeans without the availability of a corresponding herbicide to use over-the-top. Some growers illegally applied existing dicamba formulations such as Banvel and Clarity to their crops, which drifted and damaged neighboring sensitive crops. Lawsuits allege that Monsanto is responsible for this off-label dicamba use and damage.

Arkansas Approves Dicamba Ban

The Arkansas Plant Board in June 2017 voted to ban the sale and use of Dicamba in the state. At least 242 complaints in 19 Arkansas counties have been linked to potential dicamba misuse so far in 2017, according to NPR. Most complaints have come from farmers in East Arkansas.

The proposed emergency 120-day dicamba ban would apply to all agricultural fields except for pastureland. To take effect, the rule still requires approval from the Governor or Arkansas and the Arkansas Legislative Council.

Dicamba Class Action Lawsuits

  • Feb. 2017 – Class action lawsuit (Case No. 1:17-CV-00020) filed in U.S. District Court in Missouri over the off-label dicamba drift damage that allegedly occurred in 10 states over the previous year. The complaint is spearheaded by a pair of farmers from Missouri as lead plaintiffs. Class action is open to any farmers who experienced damage from illegal dicamba drift in 2016 in the following 10 states: Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee and Texas.
  • June 2017 – Arkansas farmers file a class action lawsuit against Monsanto and German chemical company BASF, alleging that the companies’ dicamba-based herbicides caused damage to their properties. Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages for damage to crops, fruits and trees that weren’t dicamba-resistant.

Can I Participate in a Class Action?

Although we are a nationally recognized class action firm, the Products Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is not filing a Dicamba class action suit, and is currently only investigating injury reports associated with the herbicide. We are not filing claims related to crop damage from Dicamba.

Need More Info?

Please visit our Dicamba FAQ page if you’d like more information about these issues.

Do I Have a Dicamba Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is investigating injury reports associated with the use of Dicamba herbicide. If you or a loved one was injured, you should contact our law firm immediately.

Dicamba Lawsuit

dicamba

Dicamba, a herbicide designed for use with Monsanto’s next generation of biotech crops, has come under scrutiny for harming crops in other fields which are not resistant to the weed killer.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was injured by dicamba, you should contact our law firm immediately.

What is Dicamba?

Dicamba is a herbicide that selectively kills broad-leafed weeds (as opposed to grass family plants). It is commonly used together with other herbicides such as glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer. Dicamba is currently used in approximately 1,100 herbicide products, according to the National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC).

Dicamba Drift

Spraying dicamba is problematic as the herbicide is known to drift from fields and damage surrounding crops. Monsanto sold its dicamba-resistant seed prior to approval of the weed killer, and farmers in Arkansas have been using dicamba to kill pesticide-resistant pigweed (Palmer amaranth) this growing season.

Arkansas Plant Board Approves Dicamba Ban

As a result of these problems, Arkansas has seen a record number of complaints of dicamba drift-damaged crops. The Arkansas Plant Board voted in June 2017 for a ban on using Dicamba outside of pastureland, pending the governor’s signature.

Dicamba Toxicity

Dicamba is moderately toxic by ingestion, inhalation or dermal exposure, according to the Pesticide Management Education Program (PMEP) at Cornell University. Signs and symptoms of dicamba poisoning include:

  • Loss of appetite (anorexia)
  • Vomiting
  • Muscle weakness
  • Slowed heart rate
  • Shortness of breath
  • Central nervous system effects (victim may become excited or depressed)
  • Benzoic acid in the urine
  • Incontinence
  • Cyanosis (bluing of the skin and gums)
  • Exhaustion following repeated muscle spasms

Inhaling dicamba can cause:

  • Irritation of the linings of the nasal passages
  • Lung damage
  • Loss of voice

Dicamba is also extremely irritating and corrosive, and can cause permanent damage to the eyes. The eyelids may swell and the cornea may be cloudy for a week after dicamba is splashed into the eyes. The chemical may also cause severe burns.

Dicamba Vs. Glyphosate

Dicamba is considered to be even more toxic than glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, which has been linked to the following serious side effects:

Has a Dicamba Class Action Been Filed?

At least 2 class action lawsuits have been filed over crop damage alleged from off-label dicamba use. In February 2017, a class action was filed in Missouri federal court on behalf of farmers in 10 states who claim their crops were damaged by dicamba drift. A similar complaint was filed in June 2017 by farmers in Arkansas who allege that dicamba-based herbicides caused damage to their properties. Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified damages for damage to crops, fruits and trees that weren’t dicamba-resistant.

Need More Info?

Please visit our Dicamba FAQ page if you’d like more information about these issues.

Do I Have a Dicamba Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is investigating injury reports associated with the use of Dicamba herbicide. If you or a loved one was injured, you should contact our law firm immediately.

Roundup Labels to Carry Cancer Warning in California

roundup

Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Monsanto Roundup weed killer, will be added to California’s list of known human carcinogens (cancer-causing substances) effective July 7, 2017.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after using or being exposed to Roundup, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit against Monsanto and our lawyers can help.

What’s the Problem?

June 27, 2017 – Roundup will henceforth be designated as a potential carcinogen under a California state law known as Proposition 65, according to the Huffington Post.

Monsanto vowed to fight the designation, which it said was “unwarranted on the basis of science and the law.”

The prop 65 designation is just the latest setback for Monsanto, which has faced a groundswell of litigation over Roundup since the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on cancer stated that glyphosate was “probably carcinogenic” in March 2015.

Dicamba, a weed killer designed to be used with Monsanto’s next generation of biotech crops, has come under fire in Arkansas after the state’s plant board voted last week to ban the herbicide.

California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) said the designation of glyphosate under Proposition 65 will proceed following an unsuccessful attempt by Monsanto to block the listing in trial court and after requests for stay were denied by a state appellate court and California’s Supreme Court.

Monsanto’s appeal of the trial court’s ruling is pending.

Do I Have a Roundup Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Roundup lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new injury and death cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you or a loved one got cancer from Roundup, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

Kansas Corn Farmers Awarded $218 Million in Syngenta Lawsuit

Syngenta Corn

Corn producers in the state of Kansas have won the first of 8 class action lawsuits alleging that they incurred economic harm due to actions Syngenta AG took with its genetically modified (GM) corn that led to the loss of an important export market for U.S. corn when shipments were suspended.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you are a corn farmer, grain elevator operator or corn exporter that has been harmed by Syngenta, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

What’s the Problem?

June 26, 2017 – The jury found Syngenta negligent and awarded $217,700,000 in compensatory damages in a class action including more than 7,000 Kansas corn growers, who were represented in the suit by 4 Kansas corn producer plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs alleged that they suffered economic damages when Syngenta sold 2 GM strains of its corn seed – Agrisure Viptera and Agrisure Duracade – to the U.S. market prior to China approving the strains.

China, a major importer of American corn, began refusing all shipments of corn from the U.S. in 2013 after a genetic trait found in Viptera – MIR162 – was detected in certain batches. The genetic trait was not approved in China at the time, according to The New York Times.

The Kansas class action lawsuit (Five Star Farms et al. vs. Syngenta AG et al., No. 2:14-cv-02571) was heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. It is the first of 8 state class action lawsuits certified in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) to date.

The other certified class actions involve Arkansas, Missouri, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Ohio and South Dakota corn producers. Numerous other complaints are pending certification.

Do I Have a Syngenta Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Syngenta lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you are a corn farmer, grain elevator, distributor or exporter who has sustained economic losses related to corn farming, distribution, domestic sales or export, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

Monsanto Sued for Mislabeling Roundup Weed Killer

roundup

A lawsuit has been filed against the Monsanto Company in Wisconsin federal court by a group of plaintiffs who claim that Roundup herbicide is mislabeled with the statement that its active ingredient targets an enzyme not found in humans or pets.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one was diagnosed with any form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma after using or being exposed to Roundup, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit against Monsanto and our lawyers can help.

What’s the Problem?

June 22, 2017 – The complaint (PDF), filed Tuesday by 6 consumers from states across the U.S., focuses on the promotion, marketing and sale of Roundup, rather than physical injuries alleged from the weed killer. Scotts Miracle-Gro Co, which also markets Roundup products, is named as a co-defendant in the case.

The lawsuit claims that Monsanto and Scotts label, market, and promote Roundup products with the “false statement that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, targets an enzyme that is not found ‘in people or pets.’”

Plaintiffs contend that this is a false and deceptive claim, as the enzyme has been identified in the gut bacteria of humans and pets, and glyphosate can adversely affect their immune system.

Monsanto aggressively markets Roundup as safe for humans and animals, despite recent studies which have found that glyphosate may be carcinogenic (cancer-causing) and affect human and animal cardiovascular, endocrine, nervous, and reproductive systems.

No reasonable consumer seeing these representations would expect that Roundup actually targets a bacterial enzyme that is found in humans and animals, and that affects their immune system health.

Plaintiffs are seeking equitable relief on behalf of the general public, with all profits earned by Monsanto for sales of Roundup in D.C. to be deposited into a charitable fund for the raising of consumer awareness regarding the effects of glyphosate.

Do I Have a Roundup Lawsuit?

The Product Liability & Defective Drug Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Roundup cancer lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new injury and death cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you got cancer from Roundup herbicide, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

Britax Recalls 200,000 Toddler Car Seats Over Choking Hazard

Britax Car Seat Recall

Britax Child Safety is recalling several models of its B-Safe infant car seats for a potential defect with the chest clip that keeps a child restrained.

Free Confidential Lawsuit Evaluation: If your child or a loved one was injured by a defective car seat, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a suit and our lawyers can help.

What’s the Problem?

June 22, 2017 – The recall was issued because the center tab on the car seats’ chest clip can break, potentially causing a choking hazard to the child using it. The following model numbers are affected:

B-Safe 35 & Travel Systems
E1A183F, E1A185M, E1A185P, E1A186R, E1A203F, E1A205M, E1A205P, E1A206X, E1A206Z, E1A207E, E9LU65V, E9LU66X, E9LU66Z, E9LU67D, E9LU67E, EXA185M, S02063600, S02063700, S03803400, S03803500, S03803700, S03803800, S03803900, S04144400, S04144500, S04144600, S04145000, S04402800, S04884200, S04884300, S04975600, S04978900, S05260200, S06020300, S06020400, S06020500, S06020600, S06020700, S06020800, S06020900, S06147100, S921800, E1A193F, E1A195M, E1A195P, E1A196X, E1A196Z, E9LV16R, E9LV17D, S04144700, S04144800, S04144900, S04183700, S04183800, S04437700, S04884400, S04884500, S06051400, S06051500, S06051600, S06051700, S06051800, E1A233F, E1A235M, E1A235P, E1A236X

Warranty Replacement Part: S03421600

B-Safe 35 Elite & Travel Systems
E1A215T, E1A215U, E1A216P, E1A221Q, E1A225C, E1A225U, E1A226L, E9LS51Q, E9LS56C, E9LS56L, E9LS57F, E9LS57G, E9LS57H, EXA216L, S01298600, S02063800, S02063900, S02064000, S04281200, S04281300, S04628500, S06018800, S06020000, S06020200, S92370, E9LV21Q, E9LV26C, E9LV26L, E9LV27F, E9LV27G, E9LV2Q8, S01298700, S04184000, S06051300, E9LT15U, E9LT16C, E9LT16L

BOB B-Safe 35 by Britax
E9LT34A, E9LT34C, E9LT35X, EXLT34A, E9LT54A, E9LT54C, E9LT55X

These products were manufactured between November 1, 2015, and May 31, 2017. To date, Britax has received no reports of injuries associated with the recall.

Recalled car seats can be fixed using a free kit that can be provided by Britax. Check the company’s website to see if your car seat is affected.

Do I Have a Britax Car Seat Recall Lawsuit?

The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of trial lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in Britax car seat lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting new injury and death cases in all 50 states.

Free Case Evaluation: Again, if your baby was injured by a defective car seat, you should contact our law firm immediately. You may be entitled to a settlement by filing a suit and we can help.

Schmidt & Clark, LLP
1455 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20004

Copyright © 2017 Schmidt & Clark, LLP
All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Site Map | Google