Update: Florida Jury Awards Soldier $1.7 Million Settlement Compensation in 3M Earplug Lawsuit
A jury in Pensacola, Florida, has awarded $1.7 million to former soldier Lloyd Baker in the latest 3M Earplug hearing damage lawsuit to reach the mass tort settlement phase, according to the Star Tribune .
The jury ruled in favor of Baker, of Wyoming, on his "failure to warn" claim about the hearing protection earplugs' risks, holding 3M 62% liable for Baker's hearing damage and Baker himself 38% liable, meaning he will receive closer to $1.1 million.
Baker is just one of more than 230,000 military active duty and civilian government employees who have sued 3M over partial hearing loss and tinnitus claims from defective protective earplugs.
In the first trial in April, a jury awarded $7.1 million — mostly in punitive damages — to three veterans, including Army veteran Brandon Adkins. In the third trial in May, 3M prevailed when the jury rejected the plaintiff's claims.
The average individual settlement per bellwether plaintiff — including the one who lost his case — is well over $1 million. Multiply that times the number of cases pending and 3M could be liable for damages in the hundreds of billions of dollars, according to individual plaintiffs' attorneys.
At least 2 more earplug bellwether trials are already scheduled in Federal Court in Pensacola, 1 each in September and October 2022. The mass tort litigation involves Combat Arms Earplugs Version 2 (CAEv2), which were sold to the military from 1999 to 2015.
The Combat Arms earplugs cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is used in the federal court system for complex product liability litigation with many separate disability claims. MDLs commonly feature upcoming trials, which set a tone for resolving all claims.
The less variance in the fourth bellwether trial outcome, the more likely an individual settlement.
3M became a giant in the military earplug market when it bought Aearo Technologies in 2008. The company maintains that Combat Arms plugs were designed properly and were safe to use as directed.
Plaintiffs allege that 3M manufactured defective military earplugs that caused hearing loss and tinnitus to the wearer's ear.
What’s the problem?
3M sold its Combat Arms Earplugs (CAEv2) to the Defense Logistics Agency without warning about defects that decreased the products’ actual effectiveness, according to allegations brought through the False Claims Act Case.
Manufactured by Aearo Technologies, 3M Combat Arms Earplugs were standard issue to U.S. active duty military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003 to 2015, according to Stripes.
The earplugs, which were designed to offer 2 levels of ear protection depending on the user’s needs, were manufactured too short at the stem, which didn’t allow the plugs to go deep enough into the ear, according to the suit. The complaint further alleged that 3M earplugs allowed ''damaging sounds to enter the ear canal.''
In July 2018, 3M agreed to pay a settlement of $9.1 million to the U.S. government for selling the defective earplugs to the military.
“Government contractors who seek to profit at the expense of our military will face appropriate consequences," said Chad Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Division.
Although the earplug lawsuit has been resolved, all claims within the settlement will end as allegations only, as 3M has admitted no liability in the case.
Military Veterans Affairs Report Hearing Loss: CBS Report
According to a CBS News report , military veterans across the U.S. who used 3M Combat Arms Earplugs have complained of problems including tinnitus, permanent hearing loss and the need for a hearing aid.
These hearing impairment problems can be debilitating and may prevent a person from being able to earn a living and enjoy life as he or she did before, the report found. As a result, these problems can lead to anxiety and emotional distress.
CBS News spoke with military service members who deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq, where they were in close proximity to small arms, heavy artillery and rockets. Until the 3M settlement, the service members believed their hearing loss and tinnitus was a normal consequence of their service.
Joseph Junk and David Hendersen served in the U.S. military for 3 and 6 years, respectively. Junk said he became a military veteran as part of family tradition and Hendersen felt a duty to military service after 9/11. They both relied on 3M earplugs to protect them from hearing loss in training and combat.
"We were told these devices are gonna save our hearing and that's what we did. We used them," Hendersen said. So did Junk. "I mean, the basic expectation is that you can rely on your training and your equipment … Everybody was just under the impression that these particular earplugs were doing their job."
"We've just been told that, 'This is the equipment you get and it's the best out there. It's gonna save you from hearing loss and tinnitus,' Junk said. "Later on, we found out that it didn't really protect our hearing that much at all."
Junk and Hendersen have filed a civil earplug lawsuit against 3M, claiming the company "did not adequately warn of the defects or adequately warn how to wear the earplugs."
"From what I remember, guys would put them in and, like, they had bigger ear canals so it would go all the way in and sort of get stuck in there or you had guys that would put them in and still be able to hear everything," Hendersen recalled. "But you have so many other things to worry about you know, particular to safety or your … physical well-being."
With their lives on the line on a daily basis, hearing was close to the bottom of the list in terms of things for service members to worry about. Both Junk and Hendersen claim to suffer significant hearing loss and tinnitus. Junk said the second he stops hearing sounds, when it's quiet, is when the ringing gets loudest.
"What is quiet? What's peace? I know for me personally, I don't have it. All I hear is ringing if there's no loud noise around me," he said. "If I do not have loud noise around me, it's maddening. It is torture."
What is Tinnitus?
Tinnitus is characterized as intermittent or continuous ringing in the ears, according to the Mayo Clinic . This is a common disability among veterans because of their exposure to extreme levels of sound including gunfire, aircraft, machinery and explosions.
3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms earplugs were supposed to provide protection to service members from these loud noises but were subsequently found to be ineffective, leaving military personnel vulnerable to tinnitus and hearing injury.
Many veterans who developed tinnitus have found that the condition may lead to other adverse complications such as difficulty concentrating and sleeping. Sadly, in most cases, tinnitus is permanent.
Tinnitus can cause loud noises in quiet surroundings that only the sufferer can hear which include:
3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms have also caused severe hearing impairment and hearing loss related hearing injuries among U.S. armed forces. This condition is the third most prevalent health problem for people in the U.S. and a top medical records issue for military armed forces.
Hearing loss can be a devastating long-term or even permanent condition. Since hearing loss is often untreatable without the use of hearing aids, it is essential to follow the right prevention techniques for hearing loss.
Symptoms of Permanent Hearing Loss
It can be hard to tell if you're losing your hearing. Other people may notice it before you do. Early signs of hearing loss include:
- Difficulty hearing other people clearly and misunderstanding what they say, especially in noisy places
- Asking people to repeat themselves
- Listening to music or watching TV with the volume higher than other people need
- Difficulty hearing on the phone
- Finding it hard to keep up with a conversation
- Feeling tired or stressed from having to concentrate while listening
These problems are often caused by hearing loss that can happen as you get older. This is permanent, but treatments such as hearing aids can help.
3M Earplug Bellwether Trial Results
There are more than 200,000 pending cases against 3M Company involving alleged defects in the company’s Combat Arms earplugs. Around 20 of these cases has been selected for bellwether trials. Each side (plaintiffs & defendants) take turns selecting individual cases for bellwether cases. If a bellwether case is a “plaintiff pick” it is going to be a very strong case that the plaintiffs are more likely to win. By contrast, “defense pick” cases are going to be weak claims that the defense is more likely to win.
Some of the bellwether cases are selected by the federal judge M. Casey Rogers. The cases picked by the federal judge are middle-of-the-road claims that are not overly favorable to either side. To date, there have been 5 bellwether trial rounds. The plaintiffs have won 3 rounds and 3M has one 2.
Looking at the results by round is somewhat misleading, however, because the first trial included 3 plaintiffs (one defense pick, one plaintiff pick, and one Northern district court judge pick). Looking at the bellwether “scorecard” by individual plaintiff gives a more accurate picture of where we stand. As shown in the chart below, 4 of 6 bellwether plaintiffs have won verdicts in their case against 3M. The only 2 losses have been in “defense pick” cases. 2 other defense pick cases have resulted in a defense verdict.
PLAINTIFF selection bias result:
- Luke Estes Pro-Plaintiff $2,450,000
- Lewis Keefer Neutral $2,420,000
- Stephen Hacker Pro-Defendant $2,260,000
- Dustin McCombs Pro-Defendant LOST
- Llyod Baker Pro-Plaintiff $1,100,000
- Brandon Atkins Pro-Defendant $8,200,000
- Michelle Blum Pro-Defendant LOST
3M Hearing Protection Whistleblower Lawsuit
The wave of veterans' claims against 3M came after the company settled a whistleblower suit in 2018. The suit was filed by rival earplug maker Moldex-Metric on the U.S. government's behalf, after an inquiry by the Army Criminal Investigation Command.
The suit claimed Aearo knew about "dangerous design defects" in its earplugs in 2000.
In a 2018 report, the Army concluded that had the government known about tests Aearo conducted in 2000, it might not have purchased Combat Arms earplugs. In the whistleblower settlement,3M paid $9.1 million but denied all claims and did not admit liability.
Ohio Army Vet Sues 3M For Defective Earplugs
A retired U.S. Army sergeant from Toledo, Ohio, has filed a products liability lawsuit against the 3M Company for providing the military with defective earplugs for at least 12 years, according to NBC 24 . Since using the product, Plaintiff Tim LeDoux has suffered hearing damage for more than a decade, according to the suit.
"It's a light ringing," LeDoux said. "As we're talking right now, users ears ring. It'll never go away. I'll never know what it's like to have true peace or silence."
Ex-Marine Sues 3M for Selling Defective Earplugs to Military
Plaintiff Kevin Doyle was issued 3M Combat Arms Earplugs while he was deployed overseas in the Army, according to NationofChange . In 2014, Doyle was diagnosed with bilateral tinnitus and hearing loss in his right ear. Prior to his joining the military, Doyle had no history of ear problems or hearing loss.
“Based on the supposed technological design and qualities of the Combat Arms Earplugs, (Defendants won) a series of Indefinite-Quantity Contracts (ICQs) to be the exclusive supplier of selective attenuation earplugs to the U.S. military between 2003 and 2012,” the complaint states. “To win these ICQs Defendants represented that the Combat Arms Earplugs would meet specific performance criteria established by the U.S. Government as a prerequisite for bidding on the IQC for earplugs.”
The lawsuit alleges that 3M and Aearo knew the earplugs were defective and falsified test results in order to acquire the contract with the U.S. military.
Internal Documents Build a Case for Negligence by 3M
A presiding judge in one of the 3M earplug lawsuits has unsealed documents and depositions that call into question the company’s safety efforts and sales tactics.
In a set of deposition records reviewed by Bloomberg Government, a 3M sales manager was asked if soldiers had a right to know that the earplugs were tested and rated for safety while they were being worn in a different configuration than the one service members were instructed to use.
The sales manager said that he “didn’t believe so.” The sales manager also admitted that he had never personally instructed any service member on the proper way to use the earplugs.
The depositions also undercut 3M’s claim that the U.S. military knew about the problem with the earplugs from the start. In the depositions, 3M could not point to any document or call transcript which would indicate that any representative of the military had been informed.
In a deposition record seen by ABC 3 WEAR-TV, an executive from Aero is recorded as answering “yes” to the question: “Is that okay, to sell a product and conceal information where it will have a negative effect on our soldiers?”
Plaintiff Seeks Consolidation of Federal 3M Earplug Lawsuits
After a group of law firms reached a $9.1 million settlement with the 3M Company to resolve allegations that it knowingly sold defective earplugs to the U.S. military, onefiled a motion seeking consolidation of all such claims into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) for pretrial handling before one judge.
In the motion, which was filed Jan. 25, Plaintiff requests the Northern District of Minnesota as the venue for the proposed MDL because 3M is headquartered there, and thus the relevant documents and witnesses are located nearby.
In the motion, Plaintiff requests the Northern District of Minnesota as the venue for the proposed MDL because 3M is headquartered there, and thus the relevant documents and witnesses are located nearby.
Consolidation in the Northern District is intended to streamline the litigation process, and to “promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions,” according to the motion.
The plaintiff who filed the motion requesting the MDL filed his personal suit on Jan. 24, alleging that:
- 3M and Aearo Technologies (which 3M purchased in 2008) manufactured and sold defective dual-ended Combat Arms earplugs;
- Defendants knew about these defects prior to selling the earplugs to the military;
- Defendants falsified test results to meet military standards and qualify for the lucrative government contract.
Moldex-Metric Inc., a firm that manufactures earplugs that compete with 3M Combat Arms Earplugs, filed a whistleblower lawsuit on behalf of the U.S. Government in May 2016, alleging that 3M made false statements regarding its dual-ended version 2 earplugs.
The company noted in the suit that the earplugs had likely caused thousands of soldiers to suffer major hearing loss and/or tinnitus, and that the indirect cost to the public has been huge.
At the time the motion to consolidate was filed, at least 8 other 3M earplug lawsuits were pending in 4 districts. The complaints were filed on behalf of military personnel who allegedly suffered hearing loss and/or tinnitus as a result of wearing the earplugs.
What are 3M Earplug Lawsuits Alleging?
The claims against 3M state that their Combat Arms Earplugs did not function as intended, and were not long enough to be properly inserted into military veterans ears. Over time, the earplugs will loosen and be completely useless to the user, according to the lawsuits.
The complaints also allege that 3M and Aearo Technologies manipulated the test results of the earplugs to meet the U.S. government’s required product standards. These fraudulent activities and claims resulted in damages that 3M has to pay to the government in this settlement.
Damages include the monetary damages directly associated with the cost of the earplugs, as well as a substantial amount for ongoing medical expenses to help veterans who suffered hearing problems or tinnitus from the allegedly defective earplugs.
Can I File a Class Action Lawsuit?
Although Schmidt & Clark, LLP, is a nationally recognized class action firm, we have decided against this type of litigation when it comes to 3M Combat Earplugs. Our product liability lawyers feel that if there is a successful resolution to these cases, individual suits, not class actions will be the best way to get maximum payouts to our clients.
If you’ve been injured by 3M ear plugs, our contingency fee personal injury lawyers know you’ve suffered emotionally and economically, and want to work with you personally to obtain the maximum settlement compensation payouts for medical bills and other damages caused by your injuries. Contact us today to learn more about your legal rights.
3 Myths About 3M Earplug Lawsuits
Having the potential to be one of the biggest litigations in recent history, social media has exploded with information and misinformation about the case. Here are 3 of the most common misconceptions:
- The $9.1 Million will be Distributed Among the Injured Military Members – FALSE
The $9.1 million settlement noted above was a False Claims Act settlement between 3M and the United States Government to resolve allegations that it knowingly sold the dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs to the U.S. Military without disclosing the defects.
The government filed suit against 3M alleging that as a government contractor, the company sold them defective combat earplugs and that the defect was not disclosed to the military.
The settlement from that lawsuit will go to the government and the whistleblower, but will not be distributed between the servicemen and women who were injured by the earplugs.
In the current litigation against 3M, veterans and active-duty members who used the combat earplugs and who were harmed as a result are suing 3M to recover for those injuries.
This lawsuit will not involve dividing up the $9.1 million, but rather each service member affected due to the earplugs has their own individual case against 3M.
- The Lawsuit Against 3M is Classified as a Class Action – FALSE
The current litigation is a multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is when individual mass tort matters are consolidated to speed up the processing and information gathering. Class action lawsuits are different from MDLs in several ways.
The most important difference is that in an MDL each plaintiff (here, the service members) will have their own individual lawsuit against 3M. In a class action, every plaintiff is involved in a single lawsuit.
As a plaintiff in an MDL case, you have more control over what happens. MDLs exist and are designed to consolidate hundreds, sometimes thousands, of similar cases in front of one federal court for efficiency’s sake.
- If I Win a Settlement in this Case I will Lose my VA Disability Benefits – FALSE
If you are a veteran receiving benefits, personal injury cases will not affect those benefits. Benefits are given based on injury to the veteran and are not based on income or financial need.
Because it is not based on income, this will not stop or decrease your benefits, regardless of whether it is a lump sum or structured payout. However, needs-based or income-based benefits could be affected.
Taking all three of the above things into account, it is very important that you speak with an attorney who is knowledgeable regarding MDLs and the 3M earplugs litigation.
You may only have a limited time to file your claim against 3M. Please call the law offices of Schmidt & Clark, LLP, with any questions about the earplugs lawsuit you may have or to start your free consultation by filling out the form at the bottom of this page.
Get a Free 3M Earplug Lawsuit Evaluation With Our Plaintiffs Lawyers
The Product Liability Litigation Group at our law firm is an experienced team of plaintiffs lawyers that focus on the representation of plaintiffs in 3M Combat Ear Plug lawsuits. We are handling individual litigation nationwide and currently accepting personal injury legal action in all 50 states.
Free Case Evaluation: Again, if you suffered hearing damage, ear damage or other side effects after using 3M earplugs, you should contact our law firm immediately using the contact form below. You may be entitled to financial compensation by filing a mass tort claim and our mass tort law firm can help.