On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of VITALITY® 2 defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant VITALITY® 2 Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant VITALITY® 2 defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant VITALITY® 2 Recall Lawsuit

On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of VITALITY® defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant VITALITY® Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant VITALITY® defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant VITALITY® Recall Lawsuit

On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of VENTAK PRIZM® 2 defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant VENTAK PRIZM® 2 Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant VENTAK PRIZM® 2 defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant VENTAK PRIZM® 2 Recall Lawsuit

On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of CONTAK RENEWAL® TR/TR2 pacemakers.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® TR/TR2 Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® TR/TR2 pacemaker, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® TR/TR2 Recall Lawsuit

On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of NEXUS® pacemakers.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant NEXUS® Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant NEXUS® pacemaker, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant NEXUS® Recall Lawsuit

On June 23, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of INSIGNIA® pacemakers.

Guidant Corporation Comments: a limited number of these devices contain a part (component) that on rare occasion may prevent the device from delivering therapy, or cause the device’s battery to run down before it should.

Do I Have a Guidant INSIGNIA® Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant INSIGNIA® pacemaker, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant INSIGNIA® Recall Lawsuit

On May 12, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds).  The recall affected the popular CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: The most common way to implant an ICD or CRT-D is subcutaneously (just under the skin). But sometimes, a doctor may instead choose to implant a device subpectorally (under the chest muscle). A doctor may also choose to implant the device facing either toward or away from the ribs. There are good reasons for each of these options, and you can be assured that your doctor has chosen the best option for your individual needs.

The safety information in this letter applies only to those VITALITY HE and CONTAK RENEWAL 3 and 4 devices that are implanted subpectorally and facing toward the ribs—a very rare position. In some cases, devices implanted in this way may malfunction. That is, the device may be unable to deliver appropriate therapy or unable to communicate with the programmer. In addition, your doctor may see a warning on the programmer screen when he or she checks your device. Keep in mind that the large majority of patients who have VITALITYHE or CONTAK RENEWAL 3 or 4 devices are not at risk for this problem.

Do I Have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 Recall Lawsuit

On May 12, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds).  The recall affected the popular VITALITY® HE defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: The most common way to implant an ICD or CRT-D is subcutaneously (just under the skin). But sometimes, a doctor may instead choose to implant a device subpectorally (under the chest muscle). A doctor may also choose to implant the device facing either toward or away from the ribs. There are good reasons for each of these options, and you can be assured that your doctor has chosen the best option for your individual needs.

The safety information in this letter applies only to those VITALITY HE and CONTAK RENEWAL 3 and 4 devices that are implanted subpectorally and facing toward the ribs—a very rare position. In some cases, devices implanted in this way may malfunction. That is, the device may be unable to deliver appropriate therapy or unable to communicate with the programmer. In addition, your doctor may see a warning on the programmer screen when he or she checks your device. Keep in mind that the large majority of patients who have VITALITYHE or CONTAK RENEWAL 3 or 4 devices are not at risk for this problem.

Do I Have a Guidant VITALITY® HE Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant VITALITY® HE defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant VITALITY® HE Recall Lawsuit

On May 12, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of defibrillators, including the popular CONTAK RENEWAL 4 AVT defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: Some of these ICDs and CRT-Ds that were manufactured around the March 2005 timeframe have been found to contain a flawed component that causes the device battery to run out before it should. These components are from a single batch from a single supplier, so not all devices are affected. If your device is affected, it will continue to function normally, but may need to be replaced sooner than expected.

Do I Have a Guidant CONTAK CONTAK RENEWAL 4 AVT Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL 4 AVT defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL 4 AVT Recall Lawsuit

On May 12, 2006 Guidant Corporation in association with the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a recall of a large number of defibrillators, including the popular CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 defibrillators.

Guidant Corporation Comments: Some of these ICDs and CRT-Ds that were manufactured around the March 2005 timeframe have been found to contain a flawed component that causes the device battery to run out before it should. These components are from a single batch from a single supplier, so not all devices are affected. If your device is affected, it will continue to function normally, but may need to be replaced sooner than expected.

Do I Have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 Recall Lawsuit?

If you or a loved one have a Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 defibrillator, regardless of whether or not you have experienced device malfunctions or failure, you should contact us immediately. You may be entitled to compensation and we can help.

Get Legal Help Now >>> Guidant CONTAK RENEWAL® 3 and 4 Recall Lawsuit